Carmen Aceijas1, Sabrina Waldhäusl2, Nicky Lambert3, Simon Cassar4, Rafael Bello-Corassa5. 1. Department of Natural Sciences, School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs Hendon, Town Hall Extension Building, UK. 2. Department of Natural Sciences, School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, London, UK. 3. Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine, Middlesex University, London, UK. 4. Wellbeing Service, Middlesex University, London, UK. 5. Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate students' health-related lifestyles and to identify barriers and social determinants of healthier lifestyles. METHODS: An online survey, two focus groups and three in-depth interviews across 2014/2015. A stratified by school size and random sample ( n = 468) of university students answered a 67-item questionnaire comprising six scales: Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity, Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients-Short Version, CAGE, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale short version, and ad hoc scale for drug use/misuse. Stratified by gender, χ2 tests were run to test associations/estimate risks and three multivariate Logistic Regression models were adjusted. A thematic approach guided the analysis of qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 60% of the respondents were insufficiently physically active, 47% had an unbalanced diet and 30% had low mental wellbeing. Alcohol drinkers versus abstinent were almost equally distributed. A total of 42% of alcohol drinkers reported getting drunk at least once a month. Smokers accounted for 16% of the respondents. Identified risk factors for suboptimal physical activity were as follows: being a woman, not using the university gym and smoking. Risk factors for unbalanced diet were low mental wellbeing and drug use. Poor mental wellbeing was predicted by unbalanced diet, not feeling like shopping and cooking frequently, and a lack of help-seeking behaviour in cases of distress. Qualitative analysis revealed seven thematic categories: transition to new life, university environment and systems, finances, academic pressure, health promotion on campus and recommendations. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that the health-related lifestyles of the student population are worrying and suggests that the trend in chronic diseases associated with unhealthy lifestyles sustained over years might be unlikely to change in future generations. University students' health-related lifestyle is a concern. Nine out of the identified 10 predictors of problematic physical activity, nutrition and mental wellbeing, were environmental/societal or institutional barriers. Universities must expand corporate responsibilities to include the promotion of health as part of their core values.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate students' health-related lifestyles and to identify barriers and social determinants of healthier lifestyles. METHODS: An online survey, two focus groups and three in-depth interviews across 2014/2015. A stratified by school size and random sample ( n = 468) of university students answered a 67-item questionnaire comprising six scales: Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity, Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients-Short Version, CAGE, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale short version, and ad hoc scale for drug use/misuse. Stratified by gender, χ2 tests were run to test associations/estimate risks and three multivariate Logistic Regression models were adjusted. A thematic approach guided the analysis of qualitative data. RESULTS: A total of 60% of the respondents were insufficiently physically active, 47% had an unbalanced diet and 30% had low mental wellbeing. Alcohol drinkers versus abstinent were almost equally distributed. A total of 42% of alcohol drinkers reported getting drunk at least once a month. Smokers accounted for 16% of the respondents. Identified risk factors for suboptimal physical activity were as follows: being a woman, not using the university gym and smoking. Risk factors for unbalanced diet were low mental wellbeing and drug use. Poor mental wellbeing was predicted by unbalanced diet, not feeling like shopping and cooking frequently, and a lack of help-seeking behaviour in cases of distress. Qualitative analysis revealed seven thematic categories: transition to new life, university environment and systems, finances, academic pressure, health promotion on campus and recommendations. CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence that the health-related lifestyles of the student population are worrying and suggests that the trend in chronic diseases associated with unhealthy lifestyles sustained over years might be unlikely to change in future generations. University students' health-related lifestyle is a concern. Nine out of the identified 10 predictors of problematic physical activity, nutrition and mental wellbeing, were environmental/societal or institutional barriers. Universities must expand corporate responsibilities to include the promotion of health as part of their core values.
Entities:
Keywords:
healthy lifestyles; public health; students; surveys
Authors: Dawid Majcherek; Arkadiusz Michał Kowalski; Małgorzata Stefania Lewandowska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Sami H Alzahrani; Ahmad Azam Malik; Jamil Bashawri; Saleh Ageel Shaheen; Musab Mamdouh Shaheen; Abdullah Abdulaziz Alsaib; Mubarak Abdullah Mubarak; Youssouf Souleymane Adam; Hassan Khaled Abdulwassi Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2019-03-25
Authors: Melissa D Olfert; Makenzie L Barr; Camille C Charlier; Geoffrey W Greene; Wenjun Zhou; Sarah E Colby Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Félix Zurita-Ortega; Georgian Badicu; Ramón Chacón-Cuberos; Manuel Castro-Sánchez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annika Molenaar; Tammie St Choi; Linda Brennan; Mike Reid; Megan Sc Lim; Helen Truby; Tracy A McCaffrey Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 5.717