Phillip J Gray1, Chun Chieh Lin2, Matthew R Cooperberg3, Ahmedin Jemal2, Jason A Efstathiou4. 1. The CHEM Center for Radiation Oncology, Hallmark Health Cancer Center, Stoneham, MA, USA. Electronic address: pjgraymd@gmail.com. 2. Surveillance & Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous management options exist for patients with prostate cancer; however, recent trends and their influencing factors are not well described. OBJECTIVE: To describe modern patterns of care and factors associated with management choice using the National Cancer Database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 were included and grouped according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines into low, intermediate, or high risk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Trend analyses and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 598 640 patients who met the study criteria; 36.3% were classified as low risk, 43.8% intermediate risk, and 20.0% high risk. Over the study period, among low-risk patients, observation increased from 9.2% to 21.3%, while radical prostatectomy (RP) increased from 29.5% to 51.1% (p<0.001 for both). In contrast, external beam radiotherapy decreased from 24.3% to 14.5%, while brachytherapy decreased from 31.7% to 11.1%. A similar pattern was seen for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease. Among high-risk patients, RP increased from 25.1% to 43.4% replacing external beam radiotherapy as the dominant therapy. On multivariate analysis, racial minorities, the uninsured, and low-income patients were less likely to receive RP. Low-risk patients in similar subgroups were significantly more likely to be observed. Limitations include potential miscoding or misclassification of variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of care in localized prostate cancer are changing rapidly. While use of observation is increasing in low-risk groups, the use of RP is increasing across all risk groups with a concomitant decline in use of radiotherapy. Socioeconomic factors appear to influence management choice. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we identify a recent significant increase in the use of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients. Socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance type, and income may affect treatments offered to and received by patients.
BACKGROUND: Numerous management options exist for patients with prostate cancer; however, recent trends and their influencing factors are not well described. OBJECTIVE: To describe modern patterns of care and factors associated with management choice using the National Cancer Database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 were included and grouped according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines into low, intermediate, or high risk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Trend analyses and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were 598 640 patients who met the study criteria; 36.3% were classified as low risk, 43.8% intermediate risk, and 20.0% high risk. Over the study period, among low-risk patients, observation increased from 9.2% to 21.3%, while radical prostatectomy (RP) increased from 29.5% to 51.1% (p<0.001 for both). In contrast, external beam radiotherapy decreased from 24.3% to 14.5%, while brachytherapy decreased from 31.7% to 11.1%. A similar pattern was seen for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk disease. Among high-risk patients, RP increased from 25.1% to 43.4% replacing external beam radiotherapy as the dominant therapy. On multivariate analysis, racial minorities, the uninsured, and low-income patients were less likely to receive RP. Low-risk patients in similar subgroups were significantly more likely to be observed. Limitations include potential miscoding or misclassification of variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of care in localized prostate cancer are changing rapidly. While use of observation is increasing in low-risk groups, the use of RP is increasing across all risk groups with a concomitant decline in use of radiotherapy. Socioeconomic factors appear to influence management choice. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we identify a recent significant increase in the use of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancerpatients. Socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance type, and income may affect treatments offered to and received by patients.
Authors: Walter Rayford; Alp Tuna Beksac; Jordan Alger; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mohsen Ahmed; Irtaza Khan; Ugo G Falagario; Yang Liu; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Edward M Schaeffer; Felix Y Feng; Brandon Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Robert B Den; Mark D Greenberger; Randy Bradley; Justin M Watson; Matthew Beamer; Lambros Stamatakis; Darrell J Carmen; Shivanshu Awasthi; Jonathan Hwang; Rachel Weil; Harri Merisaari; Nihal Mohamed; Leslie A Deane; Dimple Chakravarty; Kamlesh K Yadav; Kosj Yamoah; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-06-03
Authors: Wei Liu; Yue Zhang; Shi Wei; Sejong Bae; Wei-Hsiung Yang; Gary J Smith; James L Mohler; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Jeannette T Bensen; Guru P Sonpavde; Guo-Yun Chen; Runhua Liu; Lizhong Wang Journal: Prostate Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Guillermo Lorenzo; Víctor M Pérez-García; Alfonso Mariño; Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Robert T Dess; Todd M Morgan; Paul L Nguyen; Rohit Mehra; Howard M Sandler; Felix Y Feng; Daniel E Spratt Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.092