Literature DB >> 28558990

Utilization of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Parth K Modi1, Megan Bock1, Sinae Kim2, Eric A Singer1, Rahul R Parikh3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is not recommended for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the rate of PLND in this population is unknown.
METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Data Base for PCa patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2010 to 2013 and stratified them by D'Amico risk classification. We identified the frequency of PLND in low-risk patients and identified factors associated with receipt of PLND. Further, we determined the number of lymph nodes evaluated (quality) and proportion of patients with detected nodal metastatic disease (utility) in each risk group.
RESULTS: Of 51,971 patients with low-risk PCa who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, 19,059 (36.7%) received PLND. Predictors of PLND in low-risk patients included rural residence (odds ratio [OR], 1.157; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.009-1.327), treatment at an academic center (OR, 1.492; 95% CI 1.188-1.874), and high-volume facility (OR, 1.327; 95% CI, 1.078-1.633). The mean number of lymph nodes obtained in low-risk patients was lower than in intermediate/high-risk patients (4.74 vs. 5.86, P < .0001). Lymph node positivity was identified in 0.4% of low-risk patients and 4.6% of intermediate/high-risk patients.
CONCLUSION: While PLND is not recommended for low-risk PCa by clinical practice guidelines, it was performed frequently (36.7%) in a large hospital-based data set. PLND in this population was of lower quality (nodal yield) and had less utility of detecting nodal metastatic disease than PLND in intermediate/high-risk PCa. Treatment at a high-volume or academic center was associated with increased use of PLND. Reasons for the variation in practice patterns should be investigated to improve the value of PCa care.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Lymphadenectomy; National Cancer Data Base; Overuse; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28558990      PMCID: PMC5812447          DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  18 in total

1.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cost per median overall survival month associated with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dominic Pilon; Marykay Queener; Patrick Lefebvre; Lorie A Ellis
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Does increasing the nodal yield improve outcomes in contemporary patients without nodal metastasis undergoing radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Luis A Kluth; Evanguelos Xylinas; Malte Rieken; Felix K-H Chun; Harun Fajkovic; Andreas Becker; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Niccolo Passoni; Michael Herman; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Paul Schramek; Mesut Remzi; Wolfgang Loidl; Bertrand Guillonneau; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Douglas S Scherr; Markus Graefen; Ashutosh K Tewari; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Florian Rudolf Schroeck; Bruce L Jacobs; Sam B Bhayani; Paul L Nguyen; David Penson; Jim Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Association between surgeon and hospital characteristics and lymph node counts from radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Elyn H Wang; James B Yu; Cary P Gross; Robert Abouassaly; Edward E Cherullo; Marc C Smaldone; Nilay D Shah; Jonathon Kiechle; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Differences in histopathological evaluation of standard lymph node dissections result in differences in nodal count but not in survival.

Authors:  L S Mertens; R P Meijer; E van Werkhoven; A Bex; H G van der Poel; B W van Rhijn; W Meinhardt; S Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Marco Roscigno; Giuseppe Zanni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Regional Cost Variations of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Parth K Modi; Neal Patel; Rutveej Patel; Amirali H Salmasi; Jaspreet S Parihar; Eric A Singer; Isaac Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Does the gross prosector impact pT3 subclassification or lymph node counts in bladder cancer?

Authors:  Eric M Tretter; Joshua J Ebel; Kamal S Pohar; Debra L Zynger
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Fernando J Bianco; Andrew J Vickers; Christopher J DiBlasio; Paul A Fearn; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kushan D Radadia; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Nicholas J Farber; Joshua Sterling; Marissa Falkiewicz; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 2.  Developing a personalized template for lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ram A Pathak; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.