Literature DB >> 27596489

Sample, testing and analysis variables affecting liver mechanical properties: A review.

Giorgio Mattei1, Arti Ahluwalia2.   

Abstract

Given the critical role of liver mechanics in regulating cell response and directing the development of tissue fibrosis, accurately characterising its mechanical behaviour is of relevance for both diagnostic purposes as well as for tissue engineering and for the development of in-vitro models. Determining and quantifying the mechanical behaviour of soft biological tissues is, however, highly challenging due to their intrinsic labile nature. Indeed, a unique set of values of liver mechanical properties is still lacking to date; testing conditions can significantly affect sample status and hence the measured behaviour and reported results are strongly dependent on the adopted testing method and configuration as well as sample type and status. This review aims at summarising the bulk mechanical properties of liver described in the literature, discussing the possible sources of variation and their implications on the reported results. We distinguish between the intrinsic mechanical behaviour of hepatic tissue, which depends on sample variables, and the measured mechanical properties which also depend on the testing and analysis methods. Finally, the review provides guidelines on tissue preparation and testing conditions for generating reproducible data which can be meaningfully compared across laboratories. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Soft tissue mechanics is widely investigated, but poorly understood. This review identifies and discusses sample and testing variables which can influence the mechanical behaviour of hepatic tissue and consequently the measured mechanical properties. To encourage the biomaterial community towards more standardized testing of soft tissues and enable comparisons between data from different laboratories, we have established new testing methods and experimental recommendations for sample preparation and testing. The review could be of wide interest to scientists involved in biomaterials research because it addresses and proposes guidelines for several issues related to the mechanical testing of soft tissues whose implications have not been considered together before.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constitutive models; In-vitro models; Liver; Mechanical properties; Sources of variation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27596489     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  16 in total

1.  Deformation modeling based on mechanical properties of liver tissue for virtuanormal vectors of trianglesl surgical simulation.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Ming Hu; Xinge Shi; Deming Zhao; Lingtao Yu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Bioinspired liver scaffold design criteria.

Authors:  Giorgio Mattei; Chiara Magliaro; Andrea Pirone; Arti Ahluwalia
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Characterizing Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues Using Non-contact Displacement Measurements: How Should We Assess the Uncertainty?

Authors:  Ami Kling; Sean J Kirkpatrick; Jingfen Jiang
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-03-05

4.  Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.

Authors:  Sedigheh S Poul; Juvenal Ormachea; Gary R Ge; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 10.633

5.  Comparison of polyglycolic acid, polycaprolactone, and collagen as scaffolds for the production of tissue engineered intestine.

Authors:  Yanchun Liu; Tyler Nelson; Jason Chakroff; Barrett Cromeens; Jed Johnson; John Lannutti; Gail E Besner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Stiffness analysis of 3D spheroids using microtweezers.

Authors:  Devina Jaiswal; Norah Cowley; Zichao Bian; Guoan Zheng; Kevin P Claffey; Kazunori Hoshino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Allometric scaling of skin thickness, elasticity, viscoelasticity to mass for micro-medical device translation: from mice, rats, rabbits, pigs to humans.

Authors:  Jonathan C J Wei; Grant A Edwards; Darren J Martin; Han Huang; Michael L Crichton; Mark A F Kendall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Torsional Ultrasound Sensor Optimization for Soft Tissue Characterization.

Authors:  Juan Melchor; Rafael Muñoz; Guillermo Rus
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Micro-Mechanical Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Hydrogels Using the Nano-Epsilon Dot Method.

Authors:  Giorgio Mattei; Ludovica Cacopardo; Arti Ahluwalia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Investigation of human iPSC-derived cardiac myocyte functional maturation by single cell traction force microscopy.

Authors:  Matthew Wheelwright; Zaw Win; Jennifer L Mikkila; Kamilah Y Amen; Patrick W Alford; Joseph M Metzger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.