Literature DB >> 35525481

Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues.

Sedigheh S Poul1, Juvenal Ormachea2, Gary R Ge3, Kevin J Parker4.   

Abstract

Elastography researchers have utilized several rheological models to characterize soft tissue viscoelasticity over the past thirty years. Due to the frequency-dependent behavior of viscoelastic parameters as well as the different techniques and frequencies employed in various studies of soft tissues, rheological models have value in standardizing disparate techniques via explicit mathematical representations. However, the important question remains: which of the several available models should be considered for widespread adoption within a theoretical framework? We address this by evaluating the performance of three well established rheological models to characterize ex vivo bovine liver tissues: the Kelvin-Voigt (KV) model as a 2-parameter model, and the standard linear solid (SLS) and Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) models as 3-parameter models. The assessments were based on the analysis of time domain behavior (using stress relaxation tests) and frequency domain behavior (by measuring shear wave speed (SWS) dispersion). SWS was measured over a wide range of frequency from 1 Hz to 1 kHz using three different tests: (i) harmonic shear tests using a rheometer, (ii) reverberant shear wave (RSW) ultrasound elastography scans, and (iii) RSW optical coherence elastography scans, with each test targeting a distinct frequency range. Our results demonstrated that the KVFD model produces the only mutually consistent rendering of time and frequency domain data for liver. Furthermore, it reduces to a 2-parameter model for liver (correspondingly to a 2-parameter "spring-pot" or power-law model for SWS dispersion) and provides the most accurate predictions of the material viscoelastic behavior in time (>98% accuracy) and frequency (>96% accuracy) domains. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Rheological models are applied in quantifying tissues viscoelastic properties. This study is unique in presenting comprehensive assessments of rheological models.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elastography; Rheological model; Shear wave speed dispersion; Stress relaxation; Viscoelastic soft tissues

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35525481      PMCID: PMC9335515          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   10.633


  48 in total

1.  Preservation of tissue RNA in normal saline.

Authors:  Vladimir Vincek; Mehdi Nassiri; Jennean Knowles; Mehrdad Nadji; Azorides R Morales
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  Congruence of imaging estimators and mechanical measurements of viscoelastic properties of soft tissues.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Zhe Wu; Priya Nigwekar; Jean V Joseph; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Wave simulation in biologic media based on the Kelvin-Voigt fractional-derivative stress-strain relation.

Authors:  Michele Caputo; José M Carcione; Fabio Cavallini
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  An initial study of complete 2D shear wave dispersion images using a reverberant shear wave field.

Authors:  Juvenal Ormachea; Kevin J Parker; Richard G Barr
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Multifrequency time-harmonic elastography for the measurement of liver viscoelasticity in large tissue windows.

Authors:  Heiko Tzschätzsch; Selcan Ipek-Ugay; Manh Nguyen Trong; Jing Guo; Jonathan Eggers; Enno Gentz; Thomas Fischer; Michael Schultz; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  A microchannel flow model for soft tissue elasticity.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) on swine kidney.

Authors:  Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: Initial human study results.

Authors:  Viksit Kumar; Max Denis; Adriana Gregory; Mahdi Bayat; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Robert Fazzio; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Wave Propagation in a Fractional Viscoelastic Tissue Model: Application to Transluminal Procedures.

Authors:  Antonio Gomez; Guillermo Rus; Nader Saffari
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.