Literature DB >> 27595849

Flight mechanics and control of escape manoeuvres in hummingbirds. II. Aerodynamic force production, flight control and performance limitations.

Bo Cheng1, Bret W Tobalske2, Donald R Powers3, Tyson L Hedrick4, Yi Wang5, Susan M Wethington6, George T-C Chiu5, Xinyan Deng5.   

Abstract

The superior manoeuvrability of hummingbirds emerges from complex interactions of specialized neural and physiological processes with the unique flight dynamics of flapping wings. Escape manoeuvring is an ecologically relevant, natural behaviour of hummingbirds, from which we can gain understanding into the functional limits of vertebrate locomotor capacity. Here, we extend our kinematic analysis of escape manoeuvres from a companion paper to assess two potential limiting factors of the manoeuvring performance of hummingbirds: (1) muscle mechanical power output and (2) delays in the neural sensing and control system. We focused on the magnificent hummingbird (Eugenes fulgens, 7.8 g) and the black-chinned hummingbird (Archilochus alexandri, 3.1 g), which represent large and small species, respectively. We first estimated the aerodynamic forces, moments and the mechanical power of escape manoeuvres using measured wing kinematics. Comparing active-manoeuvring and passive-damping aerodynamic moments, we found that pitch dynamics were lightly damped and dominated by the effect of inertia, while roll dynamics were highly damped. To achieve observed closed-loop performance, pitch manoeuvres required faster sensorimotor transduction, as hummingbirds can only tolerate half the delay allowed in roll manoeuvres. Accordingly, our results suggested that pitch control may require a more sophisticated control strategy, such as those based on prediction. For the magnificent hummingbird, we estimated that escape manoeuvres required muscle mass-specific power 4.5 times that during hovering. Therefore, in addition to the limitation imposed by sensorimotor delays, muscle power could also limit the performance of escape manoeuvres.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerodynamics; Dynamics; Muscle; Neural delay; Power; Scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595849     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.137570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Birds both avoid and control collisions by harnessing visually guided force vectoring.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.293

4.  Flies land upside down on a ceiling using rapid visually mediated rotational maneuvers.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Sanjay P Sane; Jean-Michel Mongeau; Jianguo Zhao; Bo Cheng
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Wing Kinematics and Unsteady Aerodynamics of a Hummingbird Pure Yawing Maneuver.

Authors:  Alec Menzer; Yan Ren; Jiacheng Guo; Bret W Tobalske; Haibo Dong
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Quantifying the dynamic wing morphing of hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Masateru Maeda; Toshiyuki Nakata; Ikuo Kitamura; Hiroto Tanaka; Hao Liu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.