Manuel Sánchez-Luna1, Noelia González-Pacheco2, Martín Santos3, Ángel Blanco4, Cristina Orden3, Jaques Belik5, Francisco J Tendillo3. 1. Neonatology Division, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. msluna@salud.madrid.org. 2. Neonatology Division, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 3. Medical and Surgical Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitatia Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. 4. Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitatia Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. 5. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of I/E ratio on carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) combined with volume guarantee (VG). Five 2-day-old piglets were studied before and after a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The effect of an I/E ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 with (VG-ON) and without VG (VG-OFF) on PaCO2, as well as delta and mean airway pressures at the airway opening (∆Phf-ao, mPaw-ao) and at the tracheal level (∆Phf-t, mPaw-t) were evaluated at frequencies of 5, 8, 11, and 14 Hz. With the VG-ON, PaCO2 was significant lower with the I/E ratio of 1:2 at 5 Hz compared with the 1:1. mPaw-t was higher than mPaw-ao, with 1:1 I/E ratio, and on VG-ON, this difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: "In this animal study and with this ventilator, the I/E ratio of 1:1 compared to 1:2 in HFOV and VG-ON did not produce a higher CO2 lavage as when HFOV was used without the VG modality. Even more, a lower PaCO2 was found when using the lower frequency and 1:2 ratio compared to 1:1. So in contrast to non-VG HFOV mode, using a fixed tidal volume, no significant changes on CO2 elimination are observed during HFOV when the I/E ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 are compared at different frequencies." WHAT IS KNOWN: •The tidal volume on HFOV is determinant in CO 2 removal, and this is generated by delta pressure and the length of the inspiratory time. What is New: •HFOV combined with VG, an I/E ratio of 1:2 is more effective to remove CO 2 , and this is not related to the tidal volume.
UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of I/E ratio on carbon dioxide (CO2) elimination during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) combined with volume guarantee (VG). Five 2-day-old piglets were studied before and after a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The effect of an I/E ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 with (VG-ON) and without VG (VG-OFF) on PaCO2, as well as delta and mean airway pressures at the airway opening (∆Phf-ao, mPaw-ao) and at the tracheal level (∆Phf-t, mPaw-t) were evaluated at frequencies of 5, 8, 11, and 14 Hz. With the VG-ON, PaCO2 was significant lower with the I/E ratio of 1:2 at 5 Hz compared with the 1:1. mPaw-t was higher than mPaw-ao, with 1:1 I/E ratio, and on VG-ON, this difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: "In this animal study and with this ventilator, the I/E ratio of 1:1 compared to 1:2 in HFOV and VG-ON did not produce a higher CO2 lavage as when HFOV was used without the VG modality. Even more, a lower PaCO2 was found when using the lower frequency and 1:2 ratio compared to 1:1. So in contrast to non-VG HFOV mode, using a fixed tidal volume, no significant changes on CO2 elimination are observed during HFOV when the I/E ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 are compared at different frequencies." WHAT IS KNOWN: •The tidal volume on HFOV is determinant in CO 2 removal, and this is generated by delta pressure and the length of the inspiratory time. What is New: •HFOV combined with VG, an I/E ratio of 1:2 is more effective to remove CO 2 , and this is not related to the tidal volume.
Authors: Benjamin W Ackermann; Daniel Klotz; Roland Hentschel; Ulrich H Thome; Anton H van Kaam Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 3.756