Literature DB >> 27594976

Draft genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii strain NCTC 13423, a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate.

Joran E Michiels1, Bram Van den Bergh1, Maarten Fauvart2, Jan Michiels1.   

Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii is a pathogen that is becoming increasingly important and causes serious hospital-acquired infections. We sequenced the genome of A. baumannii NCTC 13423, a multidrug-resistant strain belonging to the international clone II group, isolated from a human infection in the United Kingdom in 2003. The 3,937,944 bp draft genome has a GC-content of 39.0 % and a total of 3672 predicted protein-coding sequences. The availability of genome sequences of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii isolates will fuel comparative genomic studies to help understand the worrying spread of multidrug resistance in this pathogen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter baumannii; Draft genome; Human isolate; Multidrug resistance; Nosocomial pathogen

Year:  2016        PMID: 27594976      PMCID: PMC5009669          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0181-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

recently emerged as an increasingly important pathogen causing healthcare-associated bloodstream, urinary tract, pulmonary, and device-related infections [1]. strains are often resistant against multiple antibiotics, owing to their high intrinsic resistance and a variety of acquired resistance mechanisms [2]. Carbapenem is usually an effective treatment choice, but carbapenem-resistant strains are globally on the rise, and alternative treatment options are limited [3]. Here, we present the draft genome sequence of NCTC 13423, a strain belonging to international clone lineage II isolated from a patient in a UK hospital in December 2003 [4]. NCTC 13423 shows resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and sulbactam [4]. Although originally reported as carbapenem-sensitive, a later report classified it to be also carbapenem-resistant [5]. Additionally, this strain is highly virulent and a strong biofilm producer [6].

Organism information

Classification and features

Bacteria in the genus are Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, nonfermenting, nonmotile, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative coccobacilli [7] (Table 1). The genus has gone through many taxonomic changes over the years, and the species has only been officially recognized since 1986 [8, 9]. belongs to the family , order , class , and phylum . species are ubiquitous organisms, widely distributed in nature, and can be recovered from virtually any soil or water sample. However, seems to be an exception to this rule, as it currently has no known habitats except the hospital [10]. Microscopically, they are often observed as pairs of cells (Fig. 1). can withstand prolonged desiccation, allowing it to survive on dry surfaces and probably contributing to its persistent residence in hospital settings [11]. A phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequences showed strong clustering with other strains (Fig. 2).
Table 1

Classification and general features of Acinetobacter baumannii strain NCTC 13423 according to the MIGS recommendations [12]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [29]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [30]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [31, 32]
Order Pseudomonadales TAS [33, 34]
Family Moraxellaceae TAS [35]
Genus Acinetobacter TAS [34, 36]
Species Acinetobacter baumannii TAS [8]
Strain NCTC 13423NAS
Gram stainNegativeTAS [8]
Cell shapeCoccobacillusTAS [8]
MotilityNon-motileTAS [37]
SporulationNon-sporulatingTAS [8]
Temperature rangeMesophilicTAS [38]
Optimum temperature37 °CTAS [38]
pH range; OptimumUnknownNAS
Carbon sourceChemoorganoheterotrophic; citrate, lactate, ethanol, glutarate, malate, aspartate, tyrosine, 2,3-butanediol, 4-aminobutyrateTAS [8]
MIGS-6HabitatHospitalNAS
MIGS-6.3SalinityUnknownNAS
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementStrictly aerobicTAS [8]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingTAS [8]
MIGS-14PathogenicityPathogenicTAS [4]
MIGS-4Geographic locationUnited KingdomTAS [4]
MIGS-5Sample collection12/2003TAS [4]
MIGS-4.1LatitudeUnknownNAS
MIGS-4.2LongitudeUnknownNAS
MIGS-4.4AltitudeUnknownNAS

aEvidence codes, IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39]

Fig. 1

Phase-contrast micrograph of A. baumannii NCTC 13423

Fig. 2

16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis showing the evolutionary relationship between A. baumannii NCTC 13423 and related type (T) and non-type A. baumannii strains and Acinetobacter species. Moraxella catarrhalis was used as an outgroup. Genbank accession numbers of the aligned sequences are indicated between brackets. Sequence alignment was performed using MUSCLE [27], and a neighbour-joining algorithm using the Kimura 2-parameter distance model was used to construct a phylogenetic tree in MEGA (version 7) [28]. The rate variation among sites was modelled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The optimal tree with the sum of branch lengths = 0.1583 is shown, and bootstrap support values above 60 % (1000 replicates) are indicated next to the branches

Classification and general features of Acinetobacter baumannii strain NCTC 13423 according to the MIGS recommendations [12] aEvidence codes, IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [39] Phase-contrast micrograph of A. baumannii NCTC 13423 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis showing the evolutionary relationship between A. baumannii NCTC 13423 and related type (T) and non-type A. baumannii strains and Acinetobacter species. Moraxella catarrhalis was used as an outgroup. Genbank accession numbers of the aligned sequences are indicated between brackets. Sequence alignment was performed using MUSCLE [27], and a neighbour-joining algorithm using the Kimura 2-parameter distance model was used to construct a phylogenetic tree in MEGA (version 7) [28]. The rate variation among sites was modelled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The optimal tree with the sum of branch lengths = 0.1583 is shown, and bootstrap support values above 60 % (1000 replicates) are indicated next to the branches

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The strain NCTC 13423 was isolated in 2003 in the United Kingdom from a repatriated casualty of the Iraq conflict [4], and was selected for sequencing because of its multidrug-resistant and virulence characteristics. Sequencing was carried out at the EMBL GeneCore facility (Heidelberg, Germany). Sequences were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench (version 7.5.1) and annotated using NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). This draft whole-genome sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession LOHD00000000. The project information, and its association with MIGS version 2.0 [12], is summarised in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityHigh-quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedOne paired-end Illumina library (Nextera)
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq 2000
MIGS-31.2Fold coverage203
MIGS-30AssemblersCLC NGS Cell 7.5.1
MIGS-32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS+
Locus TagAUC58
Genbank IDLOHD00000000
GenBank Date of Release2016/02/26
GOLD ID-
BIOPROJECTPRJNA305394
MIGS-13Source Material IdentifierNCTC 13423
Project relevanceMedical
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Cultures for DNA isolation were inoculated from a single colony on LB agar in 5 ml lysogeny broth and grown overnight at 37 °C with orbital shaking (200 rpm). DNA was isolated using the DNeasy Blood&Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions and pre-treatment protocol for Gram-negative bacteria. DNA concentration and purity were assessed using the Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and Qubit fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Genome sequencing and assembly

Sequencing was performed using the Nextera DNA Library Preparation Kit with the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (100 bp, paired-end) at the EMBL GeneCore facility (Heidelberg, Germany). The read library contained a total of 8,765,016 sequences in pairs. Sequence data was analysed using Qiagen’s CLC Genomics Workbench (version 7.5.1). First, reads were trimmed for quality (score limit 0.05) and ambiguous nucleotides (maximum 2 ambiguities). Next, de novo assembly was performed (mismatch cost: 2, deletion cost: 3, insertion cost: 3, length fraction: 0.5, similarity fraction: 0.8), yielding 196 contigs (minimum length 200 bp) with an average coverage of 203x. Contigs averaged 20,092 bp in length (N50 of 111,328 bp). The total length of the draft genome is 3,937,944 bp with a GC-content of 39.0 %.

Genome annotation

All contigs were annotated using NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). The Batch Web CD-Search Tool from NCBI [13] was used to identify Pfam domains [14] in the predicted protein sequences. Classification of predicted proteins in Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) functional categories [15] was done with the WebMGA web server for metagenomic analysis [16]. Signal peptides, transmembrane domains, and CRISPR repeats were predicted using the SignalP 4.1 server [17], the TMHMM server [18], and the CRISPRFinder tool [19], respectively. Only confirmed and not questionable CRISPR hits were taken into account.

Genome properties

Table 3 summarises the properties of the draft genome. Reads were assembled into 196 contigs, totalling 3,937,944 bp with a 39.0 % GC-content. PGAP predicted a total number of 3875 genes, including 3672 protein coding genes (totalling 3,384,768 base pairs), 135 pseudo genes, and 68 RNA genes (64 tRNA, 3 rRNA, and 1 ncRNA). 75.17 % of the protein-coding genes had a putative function assigned, the remainder was annotated as a hypothetical protein. Additional characteristics of the predicted genes are given in Table 3, and Table 4 shows their distribution amongst the different functional COG categories.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)3,937,944100
DNA coding (bp)3,384,76885.95
DNA G + C (bp)1,537,66439.05
DNA scaffolds196100
Total genes3875100
Protein coding genes367294.76
RNA genes681.75
Pseudo genes1353.48
Genes in internal clusters--
Genes with function prediction291375.17
Genes assigned to COGs317481.91
Genes with Pfam domains3,00277.47
Genes with signal peptides3138.08
Genes with transmembrane helices88222.76
CRISPR repeats0-
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J1774.82Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.03RNA processing and modification
K2727.41Transcription
L1253.40Replication, recombination and repair
B00.00Chromatin structure and dynamics
D320.87Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V401.09Defense mechanisms
T972.64Signal transduction mechanisms
M1935.26Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N421.14Cell motility
U882.40Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1123.05Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2025.50Energy production and conversion
G1383.76Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2887.84Amino acid transport and metabolism
F812.21Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1313.57Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1824.96Lipid transport and metabolism
P1855.04Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q972.64Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R40611.06General function prediction only
S2857.76Function unknown
-49813.56Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Functional analysis of the genome sequence by RAST annotation [20] revealed ACICU as the closest related sequenced neighbor. ACICU is an epidemic, multidrug-resistant strain isolated from a hospital outbreak in Rome [21]. The high genetic relatedness between ACICU and NCTC 13423 was confirmed by calculating their two-way average amino acid identity (AAI), which was 99.30 % based on 3360 protein sequences [22]. Indicative for the multidrug-resistant phenotype, annotations by RAST included six different β-lactamase enzymes, among which two AmpC-type β-lactamases (class C), a metallo-β-lactamase (class B), two class A β-lactamases (of which one TEM-type broad-spectrum β-lactamase) and an oxa-51 like carbapenemase (class D). Using TAfinder, a web-based tool to identify type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) loci in bacterial genomes [23], we predicted the presence of 12 type II TA modules in the NCTC 13423 draft genome. Considering only TAfinder hits with normalized homology scores (H-value) > 0.5, five putative TA modules remain, three of which are also present in the genome of ACICU. Interestingly, has been reported to form antibiotic-tolerant persister cells [24, 25], and these TA modules might play a role in their formation [26].

Conclusions

We determined the draft genome sequence of the highly virulent, multidrug-resistant NCTC 13423 clinical isolate. The availability of genomic sequences of clinical isolates from a variety of locations and sources will benefit comparative genomic studies to better understand the worrying spread of multidrug resistance in this pathogen.
  32 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Acinetobacter infection--an emerging threat to human health.

Authors:  Paolo Visca; Harald Seifert; Kevin J Towner
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.885

3.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  The Main Lines of the Natural Bacterial System.

Authors:  S Orla-Jensen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1921-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database.

Authors:  Aron Marchler-Bauer; Myra K Derbyshire; Noreen R Gonzales; Shennan Lu; Farideh Chitsaz; Lewis Y Geer; Renata C Geer; Jane He; Marc Gwadz; David I Hurwitz; Christopher J Lanczycki; Fu Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Zhouxi Wang; Roxanne A Yamashita; Dachuan Zhang; Chanjuan Zheng; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of a global pathogen.

Authors:  Luísa C S Antunes; Paolo Visca; Kevin J Towner
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Characterization of newly isolated lytic bacteriophages active against Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Maia Merabishvili; Dieter Vandenheuvel; Andrew M Kropinski; Jan Mast; Daniel De Vos; Gilbert Verbeken; Jean-Paul Noben; Rob Lavigne; Mario Vaneechoutte; Jean-Paul Pirnay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST).

Authors:  Ross Overbeek; Robert Olson; Gordon D Pusch; Gary J Olsen; James J Davis; Terry Disz; Robert A Edwards; Svetlana Gerdes; Bruce Parrello; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Alice R Wattam; Fangfang Xia; Rick Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Penelope Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Sean R Eddy; Jaina Mistry; Alex L Mitchell; Simon C Potter; Marco Punta; Matloob Qureshi; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Gustavo A Salazar; John Tate; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Fingolimod Derivatives as Antibacterial Agents.

Authors:  Matej Zore; Shella Gilbert-Girard; Inés Reigada; Jayendra Z Patel; Kirsi Savijoki; Adyary Fallarero; Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-07-09

2.  TADB 2.0: an updated database of bacterial type II toxin-antitoxin loci.

Authors:  Yingzhou Xie; Yiqing Wei; Yue Shen; Xiaobin Li; Hao Zhou; Cui Tai; Zixin Deng; Hong-Yu Ou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.