| Literature DB >> 27594852 |
Wesley J Mair1, Weiwei Deng1, Jonathan G L Mullins2, Samuel West2, Penghao Wang3, Naghmeh Besharat1, Simon R Ellwood1, Richard P Oliver1, Francisco J Lopez-Ruiz1.
Abstract
Pyrenophora teres f. sp. teres is the cause of net form of net blotch (NFNB), an economically important foliar disease in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Net and spot forms of net blotch are widely controlled using site-specific systemic fungicides. Although resistance to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors and quinone outside inhibitors has been addressed before in net blotches, mechanisms controlling demethylation inhibitor resistance have not yet been reported at the molecular level. Here we report the isolation of strains of NFNB in Australia since 2013 resistant to a range of demethylase inhibitor fungicides. Cyp51A:KO103-A1, an allele with the mutation F489L, corresponding to the archetype F495I in Aspergillus fumigatus, was only present in resistant strains and was correlated with resistance factors to various demethylase inhibitors ranging from 1.1 for epoxiconazole to 31.7 for prochloraz. Structural in silico modeling of the sensitive and resistant CYP51A proteins docked with different demethylase inhibitor fungicides showed how the interaction of F489L within the heme cavity produced a localized constriction of the region adjacent to the docking site that is predicted to result in lower binding affinities. Resistant strains also displayed enhanced induced expression of the two Cyp51A paralogs and of Cyp51B genes. While Cyp51B was found to be constitutively expressed in the absence of fungicide, Cyp51A was only detected at extremely low levels. Under fungicide induction, expression of Cyp51B, Cyp51A2, and Cyp51A1 was shown to be 1.6-, 3,- and 5.3-fold higher, respectively in the resistant isolate compared to the wild type. These increased levels of expression were not supported by changes in the promoters of any of the three genes. The implications of these findings on demethylase inhibitor activity will require current net blotch management strategies to be reconsidered in order to avoid the development of further resistance and preserve the lifespan of fungicides in use.Entities:
Keywords: Cyp51; DMI; Pyrenophora teres; azole; mutation; net blotch; overexpression; resistance
Year: 2016 PMID: 27594852 PMCID: PMC4990540 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Details and fungicide sensitivity phenotype of isolates used in this study.
| 1996 | Kalannie, WA | TEB− | 9179 |
| 1996 | Merredin, WA | TEB− | 9193 |
| 1996 | Badgingarra, WA | TEB− | 9238 |
| 1996 | Pithara, WA | TEB− | 9241 |
| 1996 | Esperance, WA | TEB− | 9254 |
| 1996 | Jerramungup, WA | TEB− | 9264 |
| 2003 | Wongan Hills, WA | TEB− | 10914 |
| 2009 | Wongan Hills, WA | TEB− | W1 |
| 2012 | Amelup, WA | TEB− | U9 |
| 2013 | TEB+ | Ko103, Ko309 | |
| 2013 | TEB− | Ko310, Ko603 | |
| 2014 | TEB+ | 14P9FG30, 14P9FG32, 14P9FG34, 14P9FG40, 14P9FG43 | |
| 2014 | Kendenup, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG430, 14P9FG435 |
| 2014 | Woogenellup, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG431, 14P9FG433, 14P9FG436 |
| 2014 | Porongurup, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG432 |
| 2014 | Tenterden, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG434, 14P9FG437 |
| 2014 | Mt Barker, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG438 |
| 2014 | Arthur River, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG439 |
| 2014 | Takaralup, WA | TEB− | 14P9FG440 |
| 2015 | 0631546E 6186387N | TEB− | 15FRG002, 15FRG003 |
| 2015 | South Stirling, WA | TEB− | 15FRG094, 15FRG095, 15FRG096, 15FRG097, 15FRG098 |
| 2015 | Esperance, WA | TEB− | 15FRG133, 15FRG134, 15FRG135, 15FRG136 |
| 2015 | Bakers Hill, WA | TEB+ | 15FRG146 |
| 2015 | Kojonup, WA | TEB− | 15FRG153, 15FRG154, 15FRG155, 15FRG156, 15FRG162, 15FRG164, 15FRG167, 15FRG168 |
| 2015 | Kendenup, WA | TEB− | 15FRG161, 15FRG172, 15FRG182, 15FRG183, 15FRG184, 15FRG185, 15FRG186, 15FRG197, 15FRG198, 15FRG199, 15FRG212 |
| 2015 | West Arthur, WA | TEB+ | 15FRG219 |
| 2015 | Dandaragan, WA | TEB+ | 15FRG220 |
| 2015 | Wickepin, WA | TEB− | 15FRG222 |
| 2015 | Tenterden, WA | TEB− | 15FRG223 |
| 2015 | TEB− | 15FRG252, 15FRG253, 15FRG254, 15FRG255, 15FRG256 | |
| 2015 | TEB− | 15FRG275, 15FRG276 |
Location: WA, Western Australia; SA, South Australia. Phenotype: TEB, tebuconazole-sensitive; TEB, tebuconazole-resistant.
Bait trial.
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study and their relevant characteristics.
| PttCyp51A_1F | ATGCTCTCCCTCCTCTTCCTC | Forward primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_2F | TACGACTGATTGAGCAAGAGGT | Primer for sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_1R | GAGATCGTGGTACAGGCTTG | Primer for sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_3F | GCATTCCAACGTCGTCAAAG | Primer for sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_2R | TTCGCTGTTGGCTGAGATAC | Primer for sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_3R | TTACCGCCTCTCCCAGC | Reverse primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_F1 | AGTCGTCCACGCCTGTCG | Forward primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_R1 | TCTTGTGTGATGAGGGTGACG | Primer for sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_F2 | CATCACACAAGAATGCGAAGAC | Primer for sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_F3 | AGGAAACCCTCCGTATCCAC | Primer for sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_R2 | GAGTGTGTGGGAAGTGGGAAC | Primer for sequencing |
| PyrCyp51B_R3 | CACTCAACTATGCCAGGTGCT | Reverse primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_Pro_F | GGCTCATAAATGGCGGAAC | Forward primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_Pro_R | AGGAAGAGGAGGGAGAGCAT | Reverse primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51B_Pro_F | CGTCAAGGGCAGCCGGATTA | Forward primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51B_Pro_R | AGGCGTGGACGACTTGGATGTA | Reverse primer for amplifying and sequencing |
| PttCyp51A_qPCR_F2 | CGTGTACGACTGTCCCAATT | Forward primer for RT-qPCR of |
| PttCyp51A_qPCR_R2 | TGCTCAATCAGTCGTACGTG | Reverse primer for RT-qPCR of |
| PttCyp51B_qPCR_F2 | GGAGCAAACGTCCATCCTAG | Forward primer for RT-qPCR of |
| PttCyp51B_qPCR_R2 | TGGATACGGAGGGTTTCCTT | Reverse primer for RT-qPCR of |
| PttActin_qPCR_F2 | AATCGTCCGTGACATCAAGG | Forward primer for qPCR of |
| PttActin_qPCR_R2 | GTACGACTTCTCCAAGCTGG | Reverse primer for qPCR of |
| WD001 | TACTGTTCTACGCCCATCTCTC | Forward primer for copy number qPCR of |
| WD002 | AATGCAGAGGGCGAGAAG | Reverse primer for copy number qPCR of |
EC.
| Ko103 | 3.9 (±0.9) | 16.4 | 0.23 (±0.02) | 2.0 | 0.18 (±0.04) | 2.7 |
| Ko309 | 2.4 (±0.2) | 10.1 | 0.16 (±0.03) | 1.4 | 0.12 (±0.01) | 1.6 |
| 14P9FG30 | 4.1 (±0.5) | 17.1 | 0.15 (±0.03) | 1.3 | 0.25 (±0.04) | 3.5 |
| 14P9FG32 | 3.8 (±0.5) | 15.8 | 0.12 (±0.02) | 1.1 | 0.38 (±0.08) | 5.3 |
| 14P9FG34 | 4.8 (±0.6) | 19.9 | 0.21 (±0.02) | 1.8 | 0.17 (±0.02) | 2.3 |
| 14P9FG40 | 4.2 (±0.3) | 17.4 | 0.13 (±0.02) | 1.1 | 0.11 (±0.01) | 1.5 |
| 14P9FG43 | 3.3 (±0.8) | 14.0 | 0.13 (±0.02) | 1.1 | 0.12 (±0.02) | 1.6 |
| 15FRG146 | 2.9 (±0.9) | 12.0 | 0.23 (±0.06) | 2.1 | 0.17 (±0.04) | 2.3 |
| 15FRG219 | 5.3 (±0.7) | 22.3 | 0.25 (±0.01) | 2.2 | 0.18 (±0.03) | 2.4 |
| 15FRG220 | 3.3 (±0.4) | 13.8 | 0.16 (±0.02) | 1.5 | 0.16 (±0.03) | 2.2 |
| 9179 | 0.32 (±0.04) | 0.21 (±0.04) | 0.04 (±0.002) | |||
| 9238 | 0.15 (±0.03) | 0.05 (±0.01) | 0.03 (±0.004) | |||
| 9241 | 0.34 (±0.02) | 0.17 (±0.01) | 0.07 (±0.01) | |||
| 9264 | 0.11 (±0.03) | 0.04 (±0.01) | 0.03 (±0.003) | |||
| 10914 | 0.33 (±0.10) | 0.23 (±0.04) | 0.21 (±0.04) | |||
| U9 | 0.06 (±0.01) | 0.02 (±0.01) | 0.05 (±0.02) | |||
| Ko310 | 0.70 (±0.33) | 0.17 (±0.04) | 0.10 (±0.02) | |||
| Ko603 | 0.44 (±0.08) | 0.08 (±0.01) | 0.10 (±0.03) | |||
| 9193 | 0.26 (±0.05) | 0.12 (±0.02) | 0.06 (±0.01) | |||
| 9254 | 0.28 (±0.05) | 0.06 (±0.004) | 0.03 (±0.01) | |||
| W1 | 0.31 (±0.08) | ND | ND | |||
EC50 values are the mean of at least two independent experiments.
± Standard error of the mean.
Resistance Factor (EC50/mean EC50 of isolates 1996–2012).
ND, Not determined.
EC.
| Ko103 | 1.8 (±0.5) | 11.4 | 0.65 (±0.13) | 7.1 |
| Ko309 | 2.7 (±0.5) | 16.7 | 0.51 (±0.08) | 5.7 |
| 14P9FG30 | 2.4 (±0.6) | 15.3 | 0.77 (±0.11) | 8.5 |
| 14P9FG32 | 2.3 (±0.2) | 14.8 | 0.74 (±0.12) | 8.2 |
| 14P9FG34 | 1.4 (±0.2) | 8.9 | 0.61 (±0.13) | 6.7 |
| 14P9FG40 | 1.6 (±0.2) | 10.0 | 0.70 (±0.08) | 7.7 |
| 14P9FG43 | 1.7 (±0.3) | 10.6 | 0.58 (±0.05) | 6.4 |
| 15FRG146 | 1.9 (±0.4) | 11.7 | 0.75 (±0.06) | 8.2 |
| 15FRG219 | 4.0 (±0.5) | 25.3 | 0.78 (±0.08) | 8.5 |
| 15FRG220 | 2.2 (±0.3) | 13.7 | 0.89 (±0.05) | 9.7 |
| 9193 | 0.11 (±0.02) | 0.12 (±0.03) | ||
| 9254 | 0.21 (±0.05) | 0.06 (±0.02) | ||
EC50 values are the mean of at least two independent experiments.
± Standard error of the mean.
Resistance Factor (EC50/mean EC50 of isolates 1996–2012).
EC.
| Ko103 | 56.5 (±7.8) | 4.2 | 26.3 (±6.0) | 19.1 | 0.15 (±0.05) | 15.2 | 0.29 (±0.03) | 31.2 |
| Ko309 | 51.7 (±7.1) | 3.8 | 22.1 (±4.2) | 16.0 | 0.10 (±0.05) | 10.2 | 0.24 (±0.07) | 25.7 |
| 14P9FG40 | 43.3 (±1.9) | 3.2 | 18.3 (±2.7) | 13.2 | 0.10 (±0.01) | 10.5 | 0.28 (±0.04) | 30.0 |
| 14P9FG43 | 41.1 (±6.6) | 3.1 | 14.9 (±1.8) | 10.8 | 0.10 (±0.03) | 10.5 | 0.17 (±0.02) | 17.8 |
| 15FRG146 | 41.1 (±7.0) | 3.1 | 24.5 (±1.7) | 17.7 | 0.14 (±0.03) | 14.4 | 0.28 (±0.06) | 30.0 |
| 15FRG220 | 43.2 (±3.6) | 3.2 | 23.2 (±4.1) | 16.8 | 0.14 (±0.02) | 13.6 | 0.30 (±0.08) | 31.7 |
| 9193 | 21.1 (±2.1) | 2.22 (±0.41) | 0.011(±0.002) | 0.008 (±0.001) | ||||
| 9254 | 5.8 (±1.5) | 0.54 (±0.02) | 0.009 (±0.002) | 0.011 (±0.002) | ||||
EC50 values are the mean of at least two independent experiments.
± Standard error of the mean.
Resistance Factor (EC50/mean EC50 of isolates 1996–2012).
Translated amino acid sequences of .
| H | H | G | G | N | I | K | K | F | W1 | |
| H | H | G | G | N | V | E | E | F | 9193 | |
| H | H | G | G | N | V | E | E | L | Ko103 | |
| H | H | G | R | N | I | K | K | F | W1, 9254 | |
| Y | Y | R | G | S | V | E | E | F | 9193, Ko103, Ko309, 14P9FG30, 14P9FG32, 14P9FG34, 14P9FG40, 14P9FG43, 15FRG146, 15FRG219, 15FRG220 | |
Tebuconazole-sensitive isolate.
Tebuconazole-resistant isolate.
Figure 1Alignment of amino acid sequences corresponding to the different . Translated amino acid sequences of the five P. teres f. sp. teres Cyp51A alleles detected in this study (KO103-A1, 9193-A1, 9193-A2, W1-A1, W1-A2), aligned with CYP51A from the reference isolate 0–1 (GenBank accession no. XP_003303644), Aspergillus fumigatus CYP51A (ASPEFU, GenBank accession no. AAK73659), and Penicillium digitatum CYP51B (PENIDI, GenBank accession no. ADO85402). Alignment is numbered according to A. fumigatus CYP51A. The positions of polymorphisms in the P. teres f. sp. teres CYP51A sequences are indicated by yellow boxes. The amino acid sequence of 9193-A1 is identical to the 0–1 reference sequence. KO103-A1 differs from 9193-A1 by the amino acid substitution F489L, orthologous to F495I in A. fumigatus and F506I in P. digitatum. Alignment generated in Geneious version 6.1 software (Biomatters) using ClustalW algorithm with Blosum scoring matrix, gap opening penalty 10, gap extension penalty 0.5, free end gaps.
Residues within 3 Å of the docked azoles and predicted binding affinities (kcal mol.
| 9193-A1 | E152, | Q166, I170, | L148, I170, N171, M288, |
| Binding affinity | −10.600 | −9.100 | −9.500 |
| KO103-A1 | F217, V218, L219, | F217, V218, P220, | F217, V218, I284, |
| Binding affinity | −9.100 | −7.500 | −8.200 |
Residues in bold are part of the M288-H292 helical region of the binding cavity that are found in close proximity to the azole-heme complex.
Predicted binding affinity based on alternative docking location.
Figure 2Structural modeling of 9193-A1 and KO103-A1 docked with difenoconazole, prochloraz, and tebuconazole. 9193-A1 (top row), KO103-A1 (bottom row). Fungicides in ball and stick, heme groups in cyan, showing the location of each azole and interacting residues shown in yellow and labeled. (A) Difenoconazole and (B) prochloraz occupy the binding cavities of 9193-1 and KO103-1 unhindered. (C) Tebuconazole binding is unhindered in 9193-1, but blocked by F217, M288, and L489 (in purple) in the KO103-1 mutant, as indicated by the spatial conflict. F217 is located away from the binding cavity in 9193-1.
Figure 3Effect of tebuconazole on . (A) qPCR confirmed constitutive expression of the Cyp51B gene in the ethanol control samples of both isolates. When grown under conditions that imposed a similar constraint on both isolates (EC50 tebuconazole), the expression of Cyp51B was found to be 1.6-fold higher in the resistant compared to the sensitive isolate. (B) qPCR showed Cyp51A (no distinction between alleles A1 and A2) to be expressed at extremely low levels in the control samples of either isolate. When grown under conditions that imposed a similar constraint on both isolates (EC50 tebuconazole), the expression of Cyp51A was 5.2-fold higher in the resistant compared to the sensitive isolate. Cyp51A expression appears to be induced by the presence of tebuconazole. Mean relative expression of genes of interest calculated by 2−ΔCT, normalized to Actin as the endogenous control (±Standard error of the mean, n = 3 biological replicates, three technical replicates per biological replicate). ***p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney U-test).
Figure 4RNAseq read counts of . (A) Mean RNAseq read counts of Cyp51B. Analysis of isolates Ko103 and 9193 showed the expression of Cyp51B to be 1.6-fold higher in the resistant compared to the sensitive isolate when grown under their corresponding EC50 tebuconazole. (B) Mean RNAseq read counts of Cyp51A1 and Cyp51A2. Expression of Cyp51A1 and Cyp51A2 was not detectable (zero reads) in the control samples of either isolate. Read density analysis of RNA sequencing data of the two isolates confirmed that both copies of Cyp51A were expressed in both isolates. The expression levels of the Cyp51A1 and Cyp51A2 alleles in Ko103 and 9193 cultures amended with their corresponding EC50 tebuconazole, were shown to be 5.3- and 3-fold higher in Ko103 than in 9193, respectively. Differential expression analysis and read count normalization achieved by edgeR (±Standard error of the mean, n = 3 biological replicates). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (Student's t-test).
Figure 5Map of Western Australia showing geographic origin of . Leaf samples were collected from 23 separate locations in Western Australia from a combination of field trips and bait trials. Locations 1, 2, and 14 were specially designed bait trials. Resistant strains of P. teres f. sp. teres were isolated from samples taken in locations 1–5. Adapted from “Outline map of Australia” (http://www.ga.gov.au/metadata-gateway/metadata/record/gcat_61754) by Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), used under CC BY 4.0.