Literature DB >> 21118345

Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen.

Zhaohui Liu1, Simon R Ellwood, Richard P Oliver, Timothy L Friesen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Pyrenophora teres, causal agent of net blotch of barley, exists in two forms, designated P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata, which induce net form net blotch (NFNB) and spot form net blotch (SFNB), respectively. Significantly more work has been performed on the net form than on the spot form although recent activity in spot form research has increased because of epidemics of SFNB in barley-producing regions. Genetic studies have demonstrated that NFNB resistance in barley is present in both dominant and recessive forms, and that resistance/susceptibility to both forms can be conferred by major genes, although minor quantitative trait loci have also been identified. Early work on the virulence of the pathogen showed toxin effector production to be important in disease induction by both forms of pathogen. Since then, several laboratories have investigated effectors of virulence and avirulence, and both forms are complex in their interaction with the host. Here, we assemble recent information from the literature that describes both forms of this important pathogen and includes reports describing the host-pathogen interaction with barley. We also include preliminary findings from a genome sequence survey. TAXONOMY: Pyrenophora teres Drechs. Kingdom Fungi; Phylum Ascomycota; Subphylum Pezizomycotina; Class Dothideomycete; Order Pleosporales; Family Pleosporaceae; Genus Pyrenophora, form teres and form maculata. IDENTIFICATION: To date, no clear morphological or life cycle differences between the two forms of P. teres have been identified, and therefore they are described collectively. Towards the end of the growing season, the fungus produces dark, globosely shaped pseudothecia, about 1-2mm in diameter, on barley. Ascospores measuring 18-28µm × 43-61µm are light brown and ellipsoidal and often have three to four transverse septa and one or two longitudinal septa in the median cells. Conidiophores usually arise singly or in groups of two or three and are lightly swollen at the base. Conidia measuring 30-174µm × 15-23µm are smoothly cylindrical and straight, round at both ends, subhyaline to yellowish brown, often with four to six pseudosepta. Morphologically, P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata are indistinguishable. HOST RANGE: Comprehensive work on the host range of P. teres f. teres has been performed; however, little information on the host range of P. teres f. maculata is available. Hordeum vulgare and H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum are considered to be the primary hosts for P. teres. However, natural infection by P. teres has been observed in other wild Hordeum species and related species from the genera Bromus, Avena and Triticum, including H. marinum, H. murinum, H. brachyantherum, H. distichon, H. hystrix, B. diandrus, A. fatua, A. sativa and T. aestivum (Shipton et al., 1973, Rev. Plant Pathol. 52:269-290). In artificial inoculation experiments under field conditions, P. teres f. teres has been shown to infect a wide range of gramineous species in the genera Agropyron, Brachypodium, Elymus, Cynodon, Deschampsia, Hordelymus and Stipa (Brown et al., 1993, Plant Dis. 77:942-947). Additionally, 43 gramineous species were used in a growth chamber study and at least one of the P. teres f. teres isolates used was able to infect 28 of the 43 species tested. However, of these 28 species, 14 exhibited weak type 1 or 2 reactions on the NFNB 1-10 scale (Tekauz, 1985). These reaction types are small pin-point lesions and could possibly be interpreted as nonhost reactions. In addition, the P. teres f. teres host range was investigated under field conditions by artificially inoculating 95 gramineous species with naturally infected barley straw. Pyrenophora teres f. teres was re-isolated from 65 of the species when infected leaves of adult plants were incubated on nutrient agar plates; however, other than Hordeum species, only two of the 65 host species exhibited moderately susceptible or susceptible field reaction types, with most species showing small dark necrotic lesions indicative of a highly resistant response to P. teres f. teres. Although these wild species have the potential to be alternative hosts, the high level of resistance identified for most of the species makes their role as a source of primary inoculum questionable. DISEASE SYMPTOMS: Two types of symptom are caused by P. teres. These are net-type lesions caused by P. teres f. teres and spot-type lesions caused by P. teres f. maculata. The net-like symptom, for which the disease was originally named, has characteristic narrow, dark-brown, longitudinal and transverse striations on infected leaves. The spot form symptom consists of dark-brown, circular to elliptical lesions surrounded by a chlorotic or necrotic halo of varying width. Molecular Plant Pathology
© 2010 BSPP and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. No claim to original US Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21118345      PMCID: PMC6640222          DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol        ISSN: 1364-3703            Impact factor:   5.663


  43 in total

Review 1.  Interplay of signaling pathways in plant disease resistance.

Authors:  B J Feys; J E Parker
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Application of BARE-1 retrotransposon markers to the mapping of a major resistance gene for net blotch in barley.

Authors:  O Manninen; R Kalendar; J Robinson; A H Schulman
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Closing the ranks to attack by powdery mildew.

Authors:  P Schulze-Lefert; J Vogel
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Identification and quantitative expression analysis of genes that are differentially expressed during conidial germination in Pyrenophora teres.

Authors:  M Dilger; F G Felsenstein; G Schwarz
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-08-23       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 5.  Host-selective toxins and avirulence determinants: what's in a name?

Authors:  Thomas J Wolpert; Larry D Dunkle; Lynda M Ciuffetti
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 13.078

6.  PTK1, a mitogen-activated-protein kinase gene, is required for conidiation, appressorium formation, and pathogenicity of Pyrenophora teres on barley.

Authors:  M C Ruiz-Roldán; F J Maier; W Schäfer
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Inheritance and RAPD tagging of multiple genes for resistance to net blotch in barley.

Authors:  S J Molnar; L E James; K J Kasha
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.166

8.  A novel nucleus-targeted protein is expressed in barley leaves during senescence and pathogen infection.

Authors:  Karin Krupinska; Kirsten Haussühl; Anke Schäfer; Tom A W van der Kooij; Gunhild Leckband; Horst Lörz; Jon Falk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Population genetic structure of Pyrenophora teres Drechs. the causal agent of net blotch in Sardinian landraces of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  D Rau; A H D Brown; C L Brubaker; G Attene; V Balmas; E Saba; R Papa
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Role of reactive oxygen species in the response of barley to necrotrophic pathogens.

Authors:  Amanda J Able
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.356

View more
  41 in total

1.  Characterization of the Barley Net Blotch Pathosystem at the Center of Origin of Host and Pathogen.

Authors:  Moshe Ronen; Hanan Sela; Eyal Fridman; Rafael Perl-Treves; Doris Kopahnke; Alexandre Moreau; Roi Ben-David; Arye Harel
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 2.  Brachypodium as an emerging model for cereal-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  Timothy L Fitzgerald; Jonathan J Powell; Katharina Schneebeli; M Mandy Hsia; Donald M Gardiner; Jennifer N Bragg; C Lynne McIntyre; John M Manners; Mick Ayliffe; Michelle Watt; John P Vogel; Robert J Henry; Kemal Kazan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Spot form of net blotch resistance in barley is under complex genetic control.

Authors:  Xuemin Wang; Emma S Mace; Gregory J Platz; Colleen H Hunt; Lee T Hickey; Jerome D Franckowiak; David R Jordan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genetic analysis of a worldwide barley collection for resistance to net form of net blotch disease (Pyrenophora teres f. teres).

Authors:  Fluturë Novakazi; Olga Afanasenko; Anna Anisimova; Gregory J Platz; Rod Snowdon; Olga Kovaleva; Alexandr Zubkovich; Frank Ordon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to net form net blotch in a collection of Nordic barley germplasm.

Authors:  Ronja Wonneberger; Andrea Ficke; Morten Lillemo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic analysis of net form net blotch resistance in barley lines CIho 5791 and Tifang against a global collection of P. teres f. teres isolates.

Authors:  V M Koladia; J D Faris; J K Richards; R S Brueggeman; S Chao; T L Friesen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Identification of quantitative trait loci for net form net blotch resistance in contemporary barley breeding germplasm from the USA using genome-wide association mapping.

Authors:  Anil Adhikari; Brian J Steffenson; Kevin P Smith; Madeleine Smith; Ruth Dill-Macky
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Association mapping utilizing diverse barley lines reveals net form net blotch seedling resistance/susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Jonathan K Richards; Timothy L Friesen; Robert S Brueggeman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Comparative genomics of a plant-pathogenic fungus, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, reveals transduplication and the impact of repeat elements on pathogenicity and population divergence.

Authors:  Viola A Manning; Iovanna Pandelova; Braham Dhillon; Larry J Wilhelm; Stephen B Goodwin; Aaron M Berlin; Melania Figueroa; Michael Freitag; James K Hane; Bernard Henrissat; Wade H Holman; Chinnappa D Kodira; Joel Martin; Richard P Oliver; Barbara Robbertse; Wendy Schackwitz; David C Schwartz; Joseph W Spatafora; B Gillian Turgeon; Chandri Yandava; Sarah Young; Shiguo Zhou; Qiandong Zeng; Igor V Grigoriev; Li-Jun Ma; Lynda M Ciuffetti
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi.

Authors:  Zhongtao Zhao; Huiquan Liu; Chenfang Wang; Jin-Rong Xu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.