Literature DB >> 27593437

Measurement of complex DNA damage induction and repair in human cellular systems after exposure to ionizing radiations of varying linear energy transfer (LET).

Zacharenia Nikitaki1, Vladimir Nikolov2, Ifigeneia V Mavragani1, Emil Mladenov2, Anastasios Mangelis1, Danae A Laskaratou1, Georgios I Fragkoulis1, Christine E Hellweg3, Olga A Martin4,5,6, Dimitris Emfietzoglou7, Vasiliki I Hatzi8, Georgia I Terzoudi8, George Iliakis2, Alexandros G Georgakilas1.   

Abstract

Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are correlated to the varying efficiency of IR to induce complex DNA damage. A double strand break (DSB) can be considered the simpler form of complex DNA damage. These types of damage can consist of DSBs, single strand breaks (SSBs) and/or non-DSB lesions such as base damages and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP; abasic) sites in different combinations. Enthralling theoretical (Monte Carlo simulations) and experimental evidence suggests an increase in the complexity of DNA damage and therefore repair resistance with linear energy transfer (LET). In this study, we have measured the induction and processing of DSB and non-DSB oxidative clusters using adaptations of immunofluorescence. Specifically, we applied foci colocalization approaches as the most current methodologies for the in situ detection of clustered DNA lesions in a variety of human normal (FEP18-11-T1) and cancerous cell lines of varying repair efficiency (MCF7, HepG2, A549, MO59K/J) and radiation qualities of increasing LET, that is γ-, X-rays 0.3-1 keV/μm, α-particles 116 keV/μm and 36Ar ions 270 keV/μm. Using γ-H2AX or 53BP1 foci staining as DSB probes, we calculated a DSB apparent rate of 5-16 DSBs/cell/Gy decreasing with LET. A similar trend was measured for non-DSB oxidized base lesions detected using antibodies against the human repair enzymes 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) or AP endonuclease (APE1), that is damage foci as probes for oxidized purines or abasic sites, respectively. In addition, using colocalization parameters previously introduced by our groups, we detected an increasing clustering of damage for DSBs and non-DSBs. We also make correlations of damage complexity with the repair efficiency of each cell line and we discuss the biological importance of these new findings with regard to the severity of IR due to the complex nature of its DNA damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex DNA damage; DNA repair; Monte Carlo simulation; foci colocalization; high LET ionizing radiations; non-DSB clusters

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27593437     DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2016.1232484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Res        ISSN: 1029-2470


  32 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Photon and Charged Particle Therapy Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shayoni Ray; Egle Cekanaviciute; Ivan Paulino Lima; Brita Singers Sørensen; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Christine E Hellweg; Arif Ali Chishti; Sebastian Diegeler; Luis F Spitta; Bernd Henschenmacher; Christa Baumstark-Khan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Investigation on the correlation between energy deposition and clustered DNA damage induced by low-energy electrons.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Zhenyu Tan; Liming Zhang; Christophe Champion
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sébastien Penninckx; Eloise Pariset; Egle Cekanaviciute; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-12-22

5.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neoplastic-Like Cell Transformation in Vitro Is Reduced with a Protective Amorphous Silica Coating.

Authors:  Tiffany G Kornberg; Todd A Stueckle; Jayme Coyle; Raymond Derk; Philip Demokritou; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying W Rojanasakul
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Fluorescence anisotropy study of radiation-induced DNA damage clustering based on FRET.

Authors:  Ken Akamatsu; Naoya Shikazono; Takeshi Saito
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Accounting for overdispersion of lethal lesions in the linear quadratic model improves performance at both high and low radiation doses.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  α-Particle-induced DNA damage tracks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of [223Ra]RaCl2-treated prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S Schumann; U Eberlein; C Lapa; J Müller; S Serfling; M Lassmann; H Scherthan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Complex DNA Damage: A Route to Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Maria P Souli; Asef Aziz; Somaira Nowsheen; Khaled Aziz; Emmy Rogakou; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Dose enhancement effects of gold nanoparticles specifically targeting RNA in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Georg Hildenbrand; Philipp Metzler; Götz Pilarczyk; Vladimir Bobu; Wilhelm Kriz; Hiltraud Hosser; Jens Fleckenstein; Matthias Krufczik; Felix Bestvater; Frederik Wenz; Michael Hausmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.