Literature DB >> 27592602

A Risk Score to Assist Selecting Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Brian C Gulack1, Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang1, Paul J Speicher1, Babatunde A Yerokun1, Betty C Tong1, Mark W Onaitis1, Thomas A D'Amico1, David H Harpole1, Matthew G Hartwig1, Mark F Berry2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term survival benefit of lobectomy over sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer must be weighed against a potentially increased risk of perioperative mortality. The objective of the current study was to create a risk score to identify patients with favorable short-term outcomes following lobectomy.
METHODS: The 2005-2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing a lobectomy or sublobar resection (either segmentectomy or wedge resection) for lung cancer. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine factors associated with 30-day mortality among the lobectomy group and to develop an associated risk score to predict perioperative mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 5,749 patients who met study criteria, 4,424 (77%) underwent lobectomy, 1,098 (19%) underwent wedge resection, and 227 (4%) underwent segmentectomy. Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cerebrovascular event, functional status, recent smoking status, and surgical approach (minimally invasive versus open) were utilized to develop the risk score. Patients with a risk score of 5 or lower had no significant difference in perioperative mortality by surgical procedure. Patients with a risk score greater than 5 had significantly higher perioperative mortality after lobectomy (4.9%) as compared to segmentectomy (3.6%) or wedge resection (0.8%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have developed a risk model that predicts relative operative mortality from a sublobar resection as compared to a lobectomy. Among patients with a risk score of 5 or less, lobectomy confers no additional perioperative risk over sublobar resection.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592602      PMCID: PMC5140083          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

1.  Sublobar resection provides an equivalent survival after lobectomy in elderly patients with early lung cancer.

Authors:  Jiro Okami; Yuri Ito; Masahiko Higashiyama; Tomio Nakayama; Toshiteru Tokunaga; Jun Maeda; Ken Kodama
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Sublobar resection: a movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Justin D Blasberg; Harvey I Pass; Jessica S Donington
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R J Ginsberg; L V Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kozower; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Michael J Liptay; Christine L Lau; David R Jones; David M Shahian; Cameron D Wright
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Survival After Sublobar Resection versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: An Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Onkar V Khullar; Yuan Liu; Theresa Gillespie; Kristin A Higgins; Suresh Ramalingam; Joseph Lipscomb; Felix G Fernandez
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 6.2015.

Authors:  David S Ettinger; Douglas E Wood; Wallace Akerley; Lyudmila A Bazhenova; Hossein Borghaei; David Ross Camidge; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Thomas J Dilling; M Chris Dobelbower; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Ritsuko Komaki; Lee M Krug; Rudy P Lackner; Michael Lanuti; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Jules Lin; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; Steven E Schild; Theresa A Shapiro; Scott J Swanson; Kurt Tauer; Stephen C Yang; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Morihito Okada; Teruaki Koike; Masahiko Higashiyama; Yasushi Yamato; Ken Kodama; Noriaki Tsubota
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis.

Authors:  Amgad El-Sherif; William E Gooding; Ricardo Santos; Brian Pettiford; Peter F Ferson; Hiran C Fernando; Susan J Urda; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Quantifying the safety benefits of wedge resection: a society of thoracic surgery database propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Philip A Linden; Thomas A D'Amico; Yaron Perry; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Shubin Sheng; Sunghee Kim; Mark Onaitis
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Sublobar Resection for Clinical Stage IA Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Lin Gu; Brian C Gulack; Xiaofei Wang; Thomas A D'Amico; Matthew G Hartwig; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  7 in total

1.  A risk score to predict postoperative complications after lobectomy in elderly lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yo Kawaguchi; Jun Hanaoka; Yasuhiko Ohshio; Tomoyuki Igarashi; Yoko Kataoka; Keigo Okamoto; Ryosuke Kaku; Kazuki Hayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 2.  Surgical treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vignesh Raman; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; John Z Deng; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Optimal treatment strategies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in veterans with pulmonary and cardiac comorbidities.

Authors:  Keith Sigel; Chung Yin Kong; Sadiq Rehmani; Susan Bates; Michael Gould; Kimberly Stone; Minal Kale; Yeun-Hee Park; Kristina Crothers; Faiz Bhora; Juan Wisnivesky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cost-effectiveness of an autoantibody test (EarlyCDT-Lung) as an aid to early diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  John Edelsberg; Derek Weycker; Mark Atwood; Geoffrey Hamilton-Fairley; James R Jett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer is applicable to more tumors than sublobar resection.

Authors:  Andrew J Song; Nathaniel Evans; Scott Cowan; Jenny Guo; Tingting Zhan; Bo Lu; Maria Werner-Wasik
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  The Survival Advantage of Lobectomy over Wedge Resection Lessens as Health-Related Life Expectancy Decreases.

Authors:  Michelle C Salazar; Maureen E Canavan; Samantha L Walters; Sitaram Chilakamarry; Theresa Ermer; Justin D Blasberg; James B Yu; Cary P Gross; Daniel J Boffa
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Sarcopenia is a predictor of outcomes after lobectomy.

Authors:  James A Miller; Kassem Harris; Charles Roche; Samjot Dhillon; Athar Battoo; Todd Demmy; Chukwumere E Nwogu; Elisabeth U Dexter; Mark Hennon; Anthony Picone; Kristopher Attwood; Sai Yendamuri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.