Literature DB >> 33735217

Optimal treatment strategies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in veterans with pulmonary and cardiac comorbidities.

Keith Sigel1, Chung Yin Kong1, Sadiq Rehmani1, Susan Bates2,3, Michael Gould4, Kimberly Stone1, Minal Kale1, Yeun-Hee Park2,3, Kristina Crothers5,6, Faiz Bhora7, Juan Wisnivesky1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Veterans are at increased risk of lung cancer and many have comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary artery disease (CAD). We used simulation modeling to assess projected outcomes associated with different management strategies of Veterans with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with COPD and/or CAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from a cohort of 14,029 Veterans (years 2000-2015) with NSCLC we extended a well-validated mathematical model of lung cancer to represent the management and outcomes of Veterans with stage I NSCLC with COPD, with or without comorbid CAD. We simulated multiple randomized trials to compare treatment with lobectomy, limited resection, or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Model output estimated expected quality adjusted life years (QALY) of Veterans with stage I NSCLC according to age, tumor size, histologic subtype, COPD severity and CAD diagnosis.
RESULTS: For Veterans <70 years old lobectomy was associated with greater projected quality-adjusted life expectancy regardless of comorbidity status. For most combinations of tumors and comorbidity profiles there was no dominant treatment for Veterans ≥80 years of age, but less invasive treatments were often superior to lobectomy. Dominant treatment choices differed by CAD status for older patients in a third of scenarios, but not for patients <70 years old.
CONCLUSIONS: The harm/benefit ratio of treatments for stage I NSCLC among Veterans may vary according to COPD severity and the presence of CAD. This information can be used to direct future research study design for Veterans with stage I lung cancer and COPD and/or CAD.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33735217      PMCID: PMC7971489          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  37 in total

1.  Predictors of enrollment in lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Wei Du; Shirish M Gadgeel; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Comparing the smoking behavior of veterans and nonveterans.

Authors:  W P McKinney; D D McIntire; T J Carmody; A Joseph
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Balancing the benefits and harms of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: Medicare's options for coverage.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: Raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes.

Authors:  Lee M Ellis; David S Bernstein; Emile E Voest; Jordan D Berlin; Daniel Sargent; Patricia Cortazar; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Roy S Herbst; Rogerio C Lilenbaum; Camelia Sima; Alan P Venook; Mithat Gonen; Richard L Schilsky; Neal J Meropol; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Landreneau; D J Sugarbaker; M J Mack; S R Hazelrigg; J D Luketich; L Fetterman; M J Liptay; S Bartley; T M Boley; R J Keenan; P F Ferson; R J Weyant; K S Naunheim
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Survival After Sublobar Resection versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: An Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Onkar V Khullar; Yuan Liu; Theresa Gillespie; Kristin A Higgins; Suresh Ramalingam; Joseph Lipscomb; Felix G Fernandez
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Are we treating enough elderly patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  A G Pallis; M Scarci
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Anthony W Kim; Kenneth I Berger; Doreen J Addrizzo-Harris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  COPD prevalence is increased in lung cancer, independent of age, sex and smoking history.

Authors:  R P Young; R J Hopkins; T Christmas; P N Black; P Metcalf; G D Gamble
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Limited resection for the treatment of patients with stage IA lung cancer.

Authors:  Juan P Wisnivesky; Claudia I Henschke; Scott Swanson; David F Yankelevitz; Javier Zulueta; Sue Marcus; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of treatment strategies for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with comorbidities.

Authors:  Keith Sigel; Chung Yin Kong; Amanda Leiter; Minal Kale; Grace Mhango; Brian Huang; Michael K Gould; Juan Wisnivesky
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.081

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.