Literature DB >> 27592412

Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.

Jessica B Hamrick1, Peter W Battaglia2, Thomas L Griffiths3, Joshua B Tenenbaum4.   

Abstract

After observing a collision between two boxes, you can immediately tell which is empty and which is full of books based on how the boxes moved. People form rich perceptions about the physical properties of objects from their interactions, an ability that plays a crucial role in learning about the physical world through our experiences. Here, we present three experiments that demonstrate people's capacity to reason about the relative masses of objects in naturalistic 3D scenes. We find that people make accurate inferences, and that they continue to fine-tune their beliefs over time. To explain our results, we propose a cognitive model that combines Bayesian inference with approximate knowledge of Newtonian physics by estimating probabilities from noisy physical simulations. We find that this model accurately predicts judgments from our experiments, suggesting that the same simulation mechanism underlies both peoples' predictions and inferences about the physical world around them.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inference; Learning; Mental simulation; Physical reasoning; Probabilistic simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592412     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  Dissociating intuitive physics from intuitive psychology: Evidence from Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Joshua B Julian; Peter Battaglia; Barbara Landau; Nancy Kanwisher; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-07-03

2.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; Jason Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-19

4.  Modeling human intuitions about liquid flow with particle-based simulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bates; Ilker Yildirim; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Peter Battaglia
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Rolling Motion Along an Incline: Visual Sensitivity to the Relation Between Acceleration and Slope.

Authors:  Francesca Ceccarelli; Barbara La Scaleia; Marta Russo; Benedetta Cesqui; Silvio Gravano; Maura Mezzetti; Alessandro Moscatelli; Andrea d'Avella; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The statistical shape of geometric reasoning.

Authors:  Yuval Hart; Moira R Dillon; Andrew Marantan; Anna L Cardenas; Elizabeth Spelke; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The visual geometry of a tool modulates generalization during adaptation.

Authors:  Mohsen Sadeghi; Hannah R Sheahan; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Invariant representations of mass in the human brain.

Authors:  Sarah Schwettmann; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.

Authors:  Nils Neupärtl; Fabian Tatai; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Inferring an Observer's Prediction Strategy in Sequence Learning Experiments.

Authors:  Abhinuv Uppal; Vanessa Ferdinand; Sarah Marzen
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.524

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.