Frederick Thurston Drake1, Neli E Mottey2, Anthony A Castelli2, Michael G Florence3, Morris G Johnson4, Scott R Steele5, Richard C Thirlby6, David R Flum7. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: Frederick.Drake@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Surgery, Skagit Valley Hospital, Mt. Vernon, WA. 5. Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. 6. Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observational research has shown that delayed presentation is associated with perforation in appendicitis. Many factors that affect the ability to present for evaluation are influenced by time of day (eg, child care, work, transportation, and office hours of primary care settings). Our objective was to evaluate for an association between care processes or clinical outcomes and presentation time of day. METHODS: The study evaluated a prospective cohort of 7,548 adults undergoing appendectomy at 56 hospitals across Washington State. Relative to presentation time, patient characteristics, time to operation, imaging use, negative appendectomy, and perforation were compared using univariate and multivariate methodologies. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of patients presented between noon and midnight. More men presented in the morning; however, race, insurance status, comorbid conditions, and white blood cell count did not differ by presentation time. Daytime presenters (6 am to 6 pm) were less likely to undergo imaging (94% vs 98%, P < .05) and had a nearly 50% decrease in median preoperative time (6.0 h vs 8.7 h, P < .001). Perforation significantly differed by time-of-day. Patients who presented during the workday (9 am to 3 pm) had a 30% increase in odds of perforation compared with patients presenting in the early morning/late night (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.59). Negative appendectomy did not vary by time-of-day. CONCLUSION: Most patients with appendicitis presented in the afternoon/evening. Socioeconomic characteristics did not vary with time-of-presentation. Patients who presented during the workday more often had perforated appendicitis compared with those who presented early morning or late night. Processes of care differed (both time-to-operation and imaging use). Time-of-day is associated with patient outcomes, process of care, and decisions to present for evaluation; this association has implications for the planning of the surgical workforce and efforts directed at quality improvement.
BACKGROUND: Observational research has shown that delayed presentation is associated with perforation in appendicitis. Many factors that affect the ability to present for evaluation are influenced by time of day (eg, child care, work, transportation, and office hours of primary care settings). Our objective was to evaluate for an association between care processes or clinical outcomes and presentation time of day. METHODS: The study evaluated a prospective cohort of 7,548 adults undergoing appendectomy at 56 hospitals across Washington State. Relative to presentation time, patient characteristics, time to operation, imaging use, negative appendectomy, and perforation were compared using univariate and multivariate methodologies. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of patients presented between noon and midnight. More men presented in the morning; however, race, insurance status, comorbid conditions, and white blood cell count did not differ by presentation time. Daytime presenters (6 am to 6 pm) were less likely to undergo imaging (94% vs 98%, P < .05) and had a nearly 50% decrease in median preoperative time (6.0 h vs 8.7 h, P < .001). Perforation significantly differed by time-of-day. Patients who presented during the workday (9 am to 3 pm) had a 30% increase in odds of perforation compared with patients presenting in the early morning/late night (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.59). Negative appendectomy did not vary by time-of-day. CONCLUSION: Most patients with appendicitis presented in the afternoon/evening. Socioeconomic characteristics did not vary with time-of-presentation. Patients who presented during the workday more often had perforated appendicitis compared with those who presented early morning or late night. Processes of care differed (both time-to-operation and imaging use). Time-of-day is associated with patient outcomes, process of care, and decisions to present for evaluation; this association has implications for the planning of the surgical workforce and efforts directed at quality improvement.
Authors: Angela S Earley; John P Pryor; Patrick K Kim; Joseph H Hedrick; Jibby E Kurichi; Amy C Minogue; Seema S Sonnad; Patrick M Reilly; C W Schwab Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Dani Yardeni; Ronald B Hirschl; Robert A Drongowski; Daniel H Teitelbaum; James D Geiger; Arnold G Coran Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Morteza Noshad; Christian C Rose; Robert Thombley; Jonathan Chiang; Conor K Corbin; Minh Nguyen; Vincent X Liu; Julia Adler-Milstein; Jonathan H Chen Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2021-01-25
Authors: Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Preet Kaur Sahota; Yanjun Chen; Maria Nguyen; Christine Louis; Jonathan Pena; Andrew Wong; Maxwell Jen Journal: World J Emerg Med Date: 2019
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Camille G Dessaigne; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Janeen R Jordan Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Wouter J Bom; Joske de Jonge; Jochem C G Scheijmans; Anna A W van Geloven; Sarah L Gans; Marja A Boermeester; Willem A Bemelman; Charles C van Rossem Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-23