Background: Invasion and angiogenesis are major hallmarks of glioblastoma (GBM) growth. While invasive tumor cells grow adjacent to blood vessels in normal brain tissue, tumor cells within neovascularized regions exhibit hypoxic stress and promote angiogenesis. The distinct microenvironments likely differentially affect metabolic processes within the tumor cells. Methods: In the present study, we analyzed gene expression and metabolic changes in a human GBM xenograft model that displayed invasive and angiogenic phenotypes. In addition, we used glioma patient biopsies to confirm the results from the xenograft model. Results: We demonstrate that the angiogenic switch in our xenograft model is linked to a proneural-to-mesenchymal transition that is associated with upregulation of the transcription factors BHLHE40, CEBPB, and STAT3. Metabolic analyses revealed that angiogenic xenografts employed higher rates of glycolysis compared with invasive xenografts. Likewise, patient biopsies exhibited higher expression of the glycolytic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A and glucose transporter 1 in hypoxic areas compared with the invasive edge and lower-grade tumors. Analysis of the mitochondrial respiratory chain showed reduction of complex I in angiogenic xenografts and hypoxic regions of GBM samples compared with invasive xenografts, nonhypoxic GBM regions, and lower-grade tumors. In vitro hypoxia experiments additionally revealed metabolic adaptation of invasive tumor cells, which increased lactate production under long-term hypoxia. Conclusions: The use of glycolysis versus mitochondrial respiration for energy production within human GBM tumors is highly dependent on the specific microenvironment. The metabolic adaptability of GBM cells highlights the difficulty of targeting one specific metabolic pathway for effective therapeutic intervention.
Background: Invasion and angiogenesis are major hallmarks of glioblastoma (GBM) growth. While invasive tumor cells grow adjacent to blood vessels in normal brain tissue, tumor cells within neovascularized regions exhibit hypoxic stress and promote angiogenesis. The distinct microenvironments likely differentially affect metabolic processes within the tumor cells. Methods: In the present study, we analyzed gene expression and metabolic changes in a human GBM xenograft model that displayed invasive and angiogenic phenotypes. In addition, we used gliomapatient biopsies to confirm the results from the xenograft model. Results: We demonstrate that the angiogenic switch in our xenograft model is linked to a proneural-to-mesenchymal transition that is associated with upregulation of the transcription factors BHLHE40, CEBPB, and STAT3. Metabolic analyses revealed that angiogenic xenografts employed higher rates of glycolysis compared with invasive xenografts. Likewise, patient biopsies exhibited higher expression of the glycolytic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A and glucose transporter 1 in hypoxic areas compared with the invasive edge and lower-grade tumors. Analysis of the mitochondrial respiratory chain showed reduction of complex I in angiogenic xenografts and hypoxic regions of GBM samples compared with invasive xenografts, nonhypoxic GBM regions, and lower-grade tumors. In vitro hypoxia experiments additionally revealed metabolic adaptation of invasive tumor cells, which increased lactate production under long-term hypoxia. Conclusions: The use of glycolysis versus mitochondrial respiration for energy production within humanGBM tumors is highly dependent on the specific microenvironment. The metabolic adaptability of GBM cells highlights the difficulty of targeting one specific metabolic pathway for effective therapeutic intervention.
Authors: Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Lee A D Cooper; David A Gutman; Candace Chisolm; Christina Appin; Jun Kong; Yuan Rong; Tahsin Kurc; Erwin G Van Meir; Joel H Saltz; Carlos S Moreno; Daniel J Brat Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Krishna M Talasila; Anke Soentgerath; Philipp Euskirchen; Gro V Rosland; Jian Wang; Peter C Huszthy; Lars Prestegarden; Kai Ove Skaftnesmo; Per Øystein Sakariassen; Eskil Eskilsson; Daniel Stieber; Olivier Keunen; Narve Brekka; Ingrid Moen; Janice M Nigro; Olav K Vintermyr; Morten Lund-Johansen; Simone Niclou; Sverre J Mørk; Per Oyvind Enger; Rolf Bjerkvig; Hrvoje Miletic Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Vashendriya V V Hira; Jill R Wormer; Hala Kakar; Barbara Breznik; Britt van der Swaan; Renske Hulsbos; Wikky Tigchelaar; Zbynek Tonar; Mohammed Khurshed; Remco J Molenaar; Cornelis J F Van Noorden Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 2.479