Nora Brychta1, Thomas Krahn1, Oliver von Ahsen2. 1. Bayer Pharma AG, Biomarker Research, Berlin, Germany. 2. Bayer Pharma AG, Biomarker Research, Berlin, Germany. oliver.vonahsen@bayer.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since surgical removal remains the only cure for pancreatic cancer, early detection is of utmost importance. Circulating biomarkers have potential as diagnostic tool for pancreatic cancer, which typically causes clinical symptoms only in advanced stage. Because of their high prevalence in pancreatic cancer, KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase [KRAS (previous name: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog)] mutations may be used to identify tumor-derived circulating plasma DNA. Here we tested the diagnostic sensitivity of chip based digital PCR for the detection of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in early stage pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We analyzed matched plasma (2 mL) and tumor samples from 50 patients with pancreatic cancer. Early stages (I and II) were predominant (41/50) in this cohort. DNA was extracted from tumor and plasma samples and tested for the common codon 12 mutations G12D, G12V, and G12C by chip-based digital PCR. RESULTS: We identified KRAS mutations in 72% of the tumors. 44% of the tumors were positive for G12D, 20% for G12V, and 10% for G12C. One tumor was positive for G12D and G12V. Analysis of the mutations in matched plasma samples revealed detection rates of 36% for G12D, 50% for G12V, and 0% for G12C. The detection appeared to be correlated with total number of tumor cells in the primary tumor. No KRAS mutations were detected in 20 samples of healthy control plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support further evaluation of tumor specific mutations as early diagnostic biomarkers using plasma samples as liquid biopsy.
BACKGROUND: Since surgical removal remains the only cure for pancreatic cancer, early detection is of utmost importance. Circulating biomarkers have potential as diagnostic tool for pancreatic cancer, which typically causes clinical symptoms only in advanced stage. Because of their high prevalence in pancreatic cancer, KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase [KRAS (previous name: Kirsten ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog)] mutations may be used to identify tumor-derived circulating plasma DNA. Here we tested the diagnostic sensitivity of chip based digital PCR for the detection of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in early stage pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We analyzed matched plasma (2 mL) and tumor samples from 50 patients with pancreatic cancer. Early stages (I and II) were predominant (41/50) in this cohort. DNA was extracted from tumor and plasma samples and tested for the common codon 12 mutations G12D, G12V, and G12C by chip-based digital PCR. RESULTS: We identified KRAS mutations in 72% of the tumors. 44% of the tumors were positive for G12D, 20% for G12V, and 10% for G12C. One tumor was positive for G12D and G12V. Analysis of the mutations in matched plasma samples revealed detection rates of 36% for G12D, 50% for G12V, and 0% for G12C. The detection appeared to be correlated with total number of tumor cells in the primary tumor. No KRAS mutations were detected in 20 samples of healthy control plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support further evaluation of tumor specific mutations as early diagnostic biomarkers using plasma samples as liquid biopsy.
Authors: Sujuan Yang; Sara P Y Che; Paul Kurywchak; Jena L Tavormina; Liv B Gansmo; Pedro Correa de Sampaio; Michael Tachezy; Maximilian Bockhorn; Florian Gebauer; Amanda R Haltom; Sonia A Melo; Valerie S LeBleu; Raghu Kalluri Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Álvaro Gómez-Tomás; José Pumarega; Juan Alguacil; André F S Amaral; Núria Malats; Natàlia Pallarès; Magda Gasull; Miquel Porta Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Anne Macgregor-Das; Jun Yu; Koji Tamura; Toshiya Abe; Masaya Suenaga; Koji Shindo; Michael Borges; Chiho Koi; Shiro Kohi; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Marco Dal Molin; Jose A Almario; Madeline Ford; Miguel Chuidian; Richard Burkhart; Jin He; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Alison P Klein; Christopher L Wolfgang; Marcia I Canto; Michael Goggins Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Inna Chen; Victoria M Raymond; Jennifer A Geis; Eric A Collisson; Benny V Jensen; Kirstine L Hermann; Mark G Erlander; Margaret Tempero; Julia S Johansen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-10-26
Authors: Miquel Porta; José Pumarega; André F S Amaral; Jeanine M Genkinger; Judit Camargo; Lorelei Mucci; Juan Alguacil; Magda Gasull; Xuehong Zhang; Eva Morales; Mar Iglesias; Shuji Ogino; Lawrence S Engel Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: David E Gaddes; Pei-Wei Lee; Alexander Y Trick; Pornpat Athamanolap; Christine M O'Keefe; Chris Puleo; Kuangwen Hsieh; Tza-Huei Wang Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 8.008