Matthew N Abourezk1, Matthew P Ithurburn2,3, Michael P McNally2, Louise M Thoma4, Matthew S Briggs3,5,6, Timothy E Hewett5,7, Kurt P Spindler8, Christopher C Kaeding3,5,6, Laura C Schmitt2,3,9. 1. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. OSU Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA. 5. Sports Medicine Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 6. Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 7. Biomechanics Laboratories and Sports Medicine Center, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 8. Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland Clinic Sports Health Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 9. Division of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon autograft often results in hamstring muscle strength asymmetry. However, the effect of hamstring muscle strength asymmetry on knee mechanics has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS: Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry would demonstrate altered involved limb knee mechanics during walking and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength at least 2 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: There were a total of 45 participants at least 2 years after ACLR (22 male, 23 female; mean time after ACLR, 34.6 months). A limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for isometric hamstring strength to subdivide the sample into symmetric hamstring (SH) (LSI ≥90%; n = 18) and asymmetric hamstring (AH) (LSI <85%; n = 18) groups. Involved knee kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3-dimensional motion analysis during gait and jogging. Peak sagittal-, frontal-, and transverse-plane knee angles and sagittal-plane knee moments and knee powers were calculated. Independent-samples t tests and analyses of covariance were used to compare involved knee kinematic and kinetic variables between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in sagittal- and frontal-plane knee angles between the groups ( P > .05 for all). The AH group demonstrated decreased tibial internal rotation during weight acceptance during gait ( P = .01) and increased tibial external rotation during jogging at initial contact ( P = .03) and during weight acceptance ( P = .02) compared with the SH group. In addition, the AH group demonstrated decreased peak negative knee power during midstance ( P = .01) during gait compared with the SH group, after controlling for gait speed, which differed between groups. CONCLUSION: Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry showed altered involved knee mechanics in the sagittal plane during gait and in the transverse plane during gait and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hamstring strength asymmetry is common at 3 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft and affects involved knee mechanics during gait and jogging. Additional research is warranted to further investigate the longitudinal effect of these alterations on knee function and joint health after ACLR.
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon autograft often results in hamstring muscle strength asymmetry. However, the effect of hamstring muscle strength asymmetry on knee mechanics has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS: Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry would demonstrate altered involved limb knee mechanics during walking and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength at least 2 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: There were a total of 45 participants at least 2 years after ACLR (22 male, 23 female; mean time after ACLR, 34.6 months). A limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated for isometric hamstring strength to subdivide the sample into symmetric hamstring (SH) (LSI ≥90%; n = 18) and asymmetric hamstring (AH) (LSI <85%; n = 18) groups. Involved knee kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3-dimensional motion analysis during gait and jogging. Peak sagittal-, frontal-, and transverse-plane knee angles and sagittal-plane knee moments and knee powers were calculated. Independent-samples t tests and analyses of covariance were used to compare involved knee kinematic and kinetic variables between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in sagittal- and frontal-plane knee angles between the groups ( P > .05 for all). The AH group demonstrated decreased tibial internal rotation during weight acceptance during gait ( P = .01) and increased tibial external rotation during jogging at initial contact ( P = .03) and during weight acceptance ( P = .02) compared with the SH group. In addition, the AH group demonstrated decreased peak negative knee power during midstance ( P = .01) during gait compared with the SH group, after controlling for gait speed, which differed between groups. CONCLUSION:Participants with hamstring strength asymmetry showed altered involved knee mechanics in the sagittal plane during gait and in the transverse plane during gait and jogging compared with those with more symmetric hamstring strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hamstring strength asymmetry is common at 3 years after ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft and affects involved knee mechanics during gait and jogging. Additional research is warranted to further investigate the longitudinal effect of these alterations on knee function and joint health after ACLR.
Authors: Daniel J Messer; Anthony J Shield; Morgan D Williams; Ryan G Timmins; Matthew N Bourne Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Amelia J H Arundale; Melissa L Ziegler; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: David Sherman; Thomas Birchmeier; Christopher M Kuenze; Craig Garrison; Joseph Hannon; James Bothwell; Curtis Bush; Grant E Norte Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Benoit Pairot-de-Fontenay; Richard W Willy; Audrey R C Elias; Ryan L Mizner; Marc-Olivier Dubé; Jean-Sébastien Roy Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 11.136