Literature DB >> 27589578

Optimal slice timing correction and its interaction with fMRI parameters and artifacts.

David Parker1, Xueqing Liu2, Qolamreza R Razlighi3.   

Abstract

Due to the nature of fMRI acquisition protocols, slices in the plane of acquisition are not acquired simultaneously or sequentially, and therefore are temporally misaligned with each other. Slice timing correction (STC) is a critical preprocessing step that corrects for this temporal misalignment. Interpolation-based STC is implemented in all major fMRI processing software packages. To date, little effort has gone towards assessing the optimal method of STC. Delineating the benefits of STC can be challenging because of its slice-dependent gain as well as its interaction with other fMRI artifacts. In this study, we propose a new optimal method (Filter-Shift) based on the fundamental properties of sampling theory in digital signal processing. We then evaluate our method by comparing it to two other methods of STC from the most popular statistical software packages, SPM and FSL. STC methods were evaluated using 338 simulated and 30 real fMRI data and demonstrate the effectiveness of STC in general as well as the superiority of the proposed method in comparison to existing ones. All methods were evaluated under various scan conditions such as motion level, interleave sequence, scanner sampling rate, and the duration of the scan itself.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPI; Interleaved acquisition; Interpolation; Slice timing correction; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27589578      PMCID: PMC5274797          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  16 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Comparison of interpolating methods for image resampling.

Authors:  J Parker; R V Kenyon; D E Troxel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second.

Authors:  M K Stehling; R Turner; P Mansfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Kelly A Barnes; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Integration of motion correction and physiological noise regression in fMRI.

Authors:  Tyler B Jones; Peter A Bandettini; Rasmus M Birn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A four-dimensional registration algorithm with application to joint correction of motion and slice timing in fMRI.

Authors:  Alexis Roche
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  10 in total

1.  Brain atrophy can introduce age-related differences in BOLD response.

Authors:  Xueqing Liu; Raphael T Gerraty; Jack Grinband; David Parker; Qolamreza R Razlighi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Evidence suggesting common mechanisms underlie contralateral and ipsilateral negative BOLD responses in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hengda He; Nabil Ettehadi; Amir Shmuel; Qolamreza R Razlighi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 3.  Graph Theoretic Analysis of Resting State Functional MR Imaging.

Authors:  John D Medaglia
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Test-retest reliability of functional MRI food receipt, anticipated receipt, and picture tasks.

Authors:  Sonja Yokum; Cara Bohon; Elliot Berkman; Eric Stice
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Landmark-guided region-based spatial normalization for functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hengda He; Qolamreza R Razlighi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 6.  3D Deep Learning on Medical Images: A Review.

Authors:  Satya P Singh; Lipo Wang; Sukrit Gupta; Haveesh Goli; Parasuraman Padmanabhan; Balázs Gulyás
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Multimodal investigation of the association between shift work and the brain in a population-based sample of older adults.

Authors:  Nora Bittner; Horst-Werner Korf; Johanna Stumme; Christiane Jockwitz; Susanne Moebus; Börge Schmidt; Nico Dragano; Svenja Caspers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 8.  Functional Neuroimaging in Traumatic Brain Injury: From Nodes to Networks.

Authors:  John D Medaglia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  The YOUth cohort study: MRI protocol and test-retest reliability in adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth E L Buimer; Pascal Pas; Rachel M Brouwer; Martijn Froeling; Hans Hoogduin; Alexander Leemans; Peter Luijten; Bastiaan J van Nierop; Mathijs Raemaekers; Hugo G Schnack; Jalmar Teeuw; Matthijs Vink; Fredy Visser; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René C W Mandl
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  SLIMM: Slice localization integrated MRI monitoring.

Authors:  Yao Sui; Onur Afacan; Ali Gholipour; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.