Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol treatment for parotid mixed infantile hemangiomas.

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol for parotid infantile hemangiomas. Between October 2012 and April 2014, propranolol was administered orally at a dose of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day to 22 infants with proliferating hemangiomas in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China). A small amount of 0.5% timolol maleate eye drop solution was topically applied with medical cotton swabs to the area of the lesion twice a day, every 12 h. The study group consisted of 9 males and 13 females, aged 2-9 months, with a median age of 4.7 months. The lesions were all located in the parotid region, and measured between 3.5×4×0.5 and 7×8×3 cm in volume. The planned duration of therapy was 6-8 months, or the two drugs were stopped when complete regression of the lesions was obtained. The therapeutic outcomes and safety were assessed by the change in the size and color of the tumor, and the presence of adverse effects throughout the course of treatment. The mean duration of therapy was 21.1 weeks and ranged from 3 to 8 months. Of the 22 patients, 16 demonstrated an excellent response, 6 showed a good response and 2 displayed a moderate response. No major collateral effects were observed. Overall, oral propranolol combined with topical timolol maleate may be used as the first-line therapeutic choice in the treatment of infantile parotid mixed hemangioma.

Introduction

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common tumors of infancy and childhood, with an incidence of 2–3% in the neonate, 10% in the baby after 1 year and up to 23% in premature infants, with a slight female predominance (1). Hemangiomas are characterized pathologically by endothelial cell hyperproliferation and may be divided into the following three types, according to the depth of their locations: Superficial hemangioma located in the papillary dermis, deep hemangioma located in the reticular dermis and subcutaneous tissue, and mixed hemangioma, which is a mixture of superficial and deep components (2). Deep hemangiomas present as blue or colorless masses, whereas superficial hemangiomas often present as bright red lesions (2). Blood flow in hemangiomas can be observed by ultrasonography. The disease is self-limiting, which often occurs in the neonatal period, and then enters the proliferative phase, stops development around the age of 1 and begins to regress (3,4). Parotid hemangioma is the most common type of salivary gland hemangioma in children. Complications of this condition may include ulceration, life-threatening airway obstruction and the risk of delayed language acquisition due to ear involvement. Patients should therefore be treated as soon a possible (5). A number of clinical studies have shown that propranolol is usually highly effective for deep hemangiomas and that timolol maleate is usually highly effective for superficial lesions (6). The present study reports the application of topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol for parotid IHs in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China), resulting in a clear curative effect.

Patients and methods

Patients

In total, 22 patients with mixed-type parotid gland proliferating hemangioma were treated with topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol between October 2012 and April 2014 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Hospital of Stomatology (Table I). The group consisted of 9 boys and 13 girls, with a mean age of 4.7 months (range, 2–9 months). The volume of these tumors varied between 3.5×4×0.5 and 7×8×3 cm, as measured by Doppler ultrasonography (Philips iU22 Cart F 4D ultrasound system; Philips Electronics Japan, Ltd., Tokyo Japan). The diagnosis of hemangioma was made based on the medical history (age of onset), clinical presentations and Doppler ultrasonography: A mixture of superficial and deep components were observed and blood flow in the hemangiomas was identified by ultrasonography. Data was collected from patient files, including clinical characteristics, efficacy of treatment and adverse reactions. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: i) No infants were administered any treatment prior to propranolol and timolol maleate.; ii) any other vascular malformations were excluded, according to the classification and nomenclature of vascular anomalies proposed by Waner and Suen (7); and iii) normal chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, blood coagulation, liver function, renal function and blood routine examination results. The Ethical Review Board of China Medical University approved the study and the parents of all infants provided written informed consent for publication.

Table I.

Summary of treatment of IHs with topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol.

Patient no.	Gender	Age at treatment onset, months	Treatment duration, weeks	Size of IH prior to treatment, cm[a]	Size of IH after treatment, cm[a]	Side effects	Follow-up, months	Response
1	F	3	20	2.5/2/0.5	0/0/0	None	6	Excellent
2	M	3	24	8/7/3	0/0/0	None	6	Excellent
3	M	2	24	4/3.5/1	0/0/0	None	10	Excellent
4	F	3	16	3.5/3/0.5	1/1.5/0	None	9	Good
5	M	7	16	3/4/1.5	1/0.5/0	Diarrhea	8	Good
6	F	6	28	7/6.5/2	0/0/0.5	None	10	Excellent
7	F	2.5	12	1.5/1/0.5	0.5/0/0	None	12	Excellent
8	F	8	20	3.5/2/1	2/1/0.5	None	6	Good
9	M	5	24	4.5/3.5/1.5	3/2/0.5	None	10	Moderate
10	F	6	16	5/3.5/2.5	1/1.5/1	None	8	Excellent
11	F	2.5	32	8/7/3	2/1.5/1	None	10	Excellent
12	M	3	12	2/3/0.5	1/0.5/0	None	9	Excellent
13	M	2	32	7/6.5/2	0/0/0	None	8	Excellent
14	F	4	28	5/4/1	1/0.5/0.5	None	6	Excellent
15	M	6	20	3/3/0.5	1/1.5/0	None	6	Good
16	F	9	24	4/4/2	1/0.5/1	None	8	Excellent
17	F	7	24	5/5/2	2/2/0.5	None	12	Good
18	M	5	12	2.5/2.5/0.5	1/0.5/0	None	12	Excellent
19	M	3	16	2/2/0.5	0/0/0	None	9	Excellent
20	F	4.5	20	2.5/1.5/1	0/0/0	None	8	Excellent
21	F	3.5	16	2/1.5/0.5	0.5/0.5/0	None	6	Good
22	F	9	28	4/4.5/2	2/2/0.5	None	7	Moderate

Data presented a length/width/depth. IH, infantile hemangioma; M, male; F, female.

Treatment protocol

All patients were admitted to the hospital when the hemangiomas were in the rapidly proliferating phase. Propranolol (10 mg/tablet; Tianjin Lisheng Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tianjin, China) was prepared from a tablet into a suitable solution at a single oral dose of 1.0–1.5 mg/kg/day (1.0 mg/kg for patients <3 months old and 1.5 mg/kg for patients >3 months old). A small amount of 0.5% timolol maleate eye drop solution (25 mg/5 ml; Wuhan Five King Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China) was also topically applied with medical cotton swabs to the area of the lesion twice a day, every 12 h. For the first 3–5 days of management, heart rate, blood pressure and blood glucose levels were monitored in the inpatient ward. The patients who experienced no adverse reactions were topically administered the drug by their parents or guardians following discharge from the hospital. Close observation was paid to the heart rate, blood pressure and other vital signs during the treatment, and the parents were informed to look for local redness and symptoms such as a loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, wheezing, shortness of breath or lethargy. Once any symptom appeared, the drugs were stopped immediately and the patient observed carefully. The patients were reexamined periodically in order to observe the size and color of the hemangiomas for assessment of the curative effect. The dose of the drug was altered according to the change in the weight of the patient and the degree of adverse reaction at the period of follow-up. Treatment was continued until 1 year old, unless complete resolution occurred (8). The follow-up timeline ranged from 1–10 months (median, 6.4 months).

Evaluation of efficacy

The therapeutic outcome was evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography. The results were measured by the hemisphere measurement and visual changes on photography (9). The clinical effect of treatment was graded on a 4-point scale proposed by Achauer et al (10), based on improvements in tumor volume, color and texture after treatment, as follows: I (poor), tumor volume decreased by <25%; II (moderate), tumor volume decreased by 26–50%; III (good), tumor volume decreased by 51–75%; and IV (excellent), tumor volume decreased by 76–100%.

With regard to safety, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and blood glucose level were close monitored in the course of the 3-day hospitalization period and were recorded 1 h after each dose. Local side effects, including rashes, red spots, erosion and ulceration, were also closely observed.

Statistical analysis

All data was entered into a database and processed using SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the differences in the average heart rate, SBP and DBP prior to and following drug administration. P<0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

All the hemangiomas decreased in size following treatment and in the majority of cases, the tumor color changed from bright red to dull red. Efficacy scores was evaluated as follows: IV (excellent), 14 cases (64%); III (good), 6 cases (27%); II (moderate), 2 cases (9%); and I (poor), 0 cases (0%). The parents were quite satisfied with the results. At 24 h post-medication, the tension of the tumor surface of the majority of children decreased and the texture became softer. In total, the drug was administered for 12 weeks in 3 patients, for 16 weeks in 5 patients, for 20 weeks in 4 patients, for 24 weeks in 5 patients, for 28 weeks in 3 patients and for 32 weeks in 2 patients, with a mean time of 21.1 weeks. The tumor of 1 patient regressed completely following 16 weeks of treatment. However, the tumor had relapsed when the infant was followed up 6 weeks later and the proliferation was subsequently effectively controlled by the continuation of medication for ~10 weeks after treatment, until it decreased in size. Typical cases are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.

Figure 1.

A pediatric patient (patient no. 6) with an infantile hemangioma in the left parotid area at (A) 6 months of age, prior to treatment, and (B) at 4 years of age, 28 weeks after topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol treatment. The coloration of the tumor was markedly decreased.

Figure 2.

An 8-month-old girl with a infantile hemangioma in the right parotid area (A) prior to treatment and (B) at 4 years of age, 20 weeks after topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol treatment. The tumor completely disappeared.

No infants were withdrawn from the treatment study due to side effects. In total, 22 infants exhibited a decreased heart rate, blood pressure and rate of breathing after starting the treatment. However, all these signs returned to normal after propranolol had been administered for >12 h (P>0.05; Table II), and no patients required additional treatment. No severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions occurred.

Table II.

Heart rate and blood pressure at baseline and during the propranolol and timolol maleate treatment initiation period (mean ± standard deviation).

Parameter	Baseline	Day 1	Day 2	Day 3
Heart rate (beats per min)	127.1±11.5	124.0±15.6	124.3±13.4	125.3±14.8
SBP (mmHg)	85.4±13.3	84.6±17.1	85.5±16.6	85.0±18.2
DBP (mmHg)	57.5±10.2	58.3±12.6	57.1±11.2	56.9±9.7

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Discussion

Infantile parotid proliferating hemangiomas, which are the most common parotid tumors, occurred around 1 year after birth, accounting for >50% parotid gland tumors in infants (11). Hemorrhage, ulceration, infection and external auditory canal compression are the main complications of the tumor. Facial hemangiomas can cause serious psychological issues in the affected patients. Positive intervention rather than observation should be therefore be adopted, and appropriate treatment should be provided according to the different growth phases of the hemangiomas (12).

At present, the treatment methods for IH are conservative rather than surgical, and include as drug and laser therapies. Common drugs for the treatment of hemangioma are corticosteroids, and anticancer drugs, such as interferon and imiquimod (13–18), but these methods lead to different degrees of side effects. The only suitable treatment for early superficial hemangiomas is laser therapy (19). With regard to the surgical treatment of parotid region hemangiomas, there have been various proposals and the optimal surgical duration is uncertain. The surgical treatment must be selected carefully due to complications such as temporary paralysis, recurrence, salivary fistula, hematoma, auriculotemporal nerve syndrome, facial nerve injury and scarring (20).

Hemangiomas can be divided into three types according to the depth of their locations: Superficial hemangioma located in the papillary dermis, deep hemangioma located in the reticular dermis and subcutaneous tissue, and mixed hemangioma, which is a mixture of superficial and deep components (21). In the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Hospital of Stomatology, personalized treatment options are used based on the hemangioma site, size and depth, among other factors, in order to obtain the best treatment effect (22). Currently, drug treatment is the preferred treatment of IHs. In 2008, Léauté-Labrèze et al first reported the use propranolol for the treatment of IH, and achieved good results (22). This study soon attracted the attention of scholars from all over the world, which triggered a series of associated studies on propranolol in the treatment of IH (8,11,22,23). Propranolol is a non-selective β-adrenergic antagonist, whose treatment effect on IH is verified. Compared with the traditional corticosteroid therapy, it has better tolerability, less adverse reactions and greater efficiency (23–25). Timolol maleate is a non-selective potent β-adrenergic antagonist (β1 and β2) that has been mainly used for the clinical treatment of hypertension, angina pectoris, tachycardia and glaucoma (26). The predominant adverse effects include hypotension, hypoglycemia, bronchospasm and local pruritus. Timolol was first used for glaucoma in the United States in 1978. It is safe for the treatment of the pediatric population, and has been used for glaucoma as a first-line medicine by pediatric ophthalmologists for >30 years (27). Timolol, as a type of ophthalmic drug, causes little irritation to local tissues, and its effect can only be observed in certain regions, with little systemic reaction, so the application of timolol maleate as a topical medication is extremely safe (28). Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated that treatment with propranolol is effective for both deep and superficial hemangiomas. In addition, the treatment response to oral propranolol is better for deep IHs than superficial IHs. Generally, timolol meleate is a highly effective treatment for superficial lesions. Therefore, combined treatment with oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate has been developed for mixed and superficial lesions, and oral propranolol is used to treat deep lesions (29).

No uniform safe dosage standard exists for the treatment of hemangioma using propranolol, however, according to domestic studies (30–33) and our considerable clinical experience, we believe that 1.0 mg/kg propranolol for patients <3 months old and 1.5 mg/kg propranolol for patients >3 months old is a safe dosage. An infant should, however, undergo a detailed general examination prior to this prescription. Furthermore, all infants should be hospitalized as an inpatient under observation for 3–5 days after the initial treatment, and the blood pressure, heart rate and adverse reactions should be closely monitored.

In 2010, Guo and Ni (34) described the case of a 4-month-old infant with superficial capillary hemangioma of the eyelid, and became the first study to report a successful outcome subsequent to the use of timolol solution; this success was subsequently reinforced by a series of other studies. In 2011, Pope and Chakkittakandiyil reported 6 cases of IHs treated with timolol in which the symptoms improved significantly (35). Li et al reported 25 cases of children with hemangiomas who were administered 0.5% topical timolol maleate, resulting in a clear positive effect. According to the related literature, the pharmacological effects of timolol are 8 times higher than propranolol (36). Therefore, the oral dose of propranolol can be reduced while topically using timolol maleate, therefore ensuring drug safety and reducing complications.

Despite the strong effects of propranolol and timolol maleate for the treatment of IH, the mechanism of action remains unknown (37). Vasoconstriction may be responsible for the early effects on the color of the hemangioma due to the decreased release of nitric oxide. Growth arrest is attributable to the blocking of proangiogenic signals, including vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, matrix metalloproteinases and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (38).

In the present study, attention was focused on the use of topical timolol maleate combined with oral propranolol for the treatment of parotid IHs. Good results were achieved using this combined treatment, which resulted in clear curative effects, with reduced complications. On the whole, as a quicker, safe and effective treatment, combined treatment with topical timolol maleate and oral propranolol for the treatment of parotid IHs should become the preferred therapeutic option.