Literature DB >> 27586125

Surgical treatment of acromegaly according to the 2010 remission criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniele Starnoni1, Roy Thomas Daniel1, Laura Marino2, Nelly Pitteloud2, Marc Levivier1, Mahmoud Messerer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Acromegaly Consensus Group revised the criteria for cure of acromegaly and thus rates of surgical remission need to be revised in light of these new thresholds. Two subgroups consisted of patients with discordant GH and IGF-1 levels and patients in remission according to the 2000 criteria, but not to the 2010 criteria, have been reported after adenomectomy and for these subgroups the precise incidence and management has not been established. The objective of the study was to update rates of surgical remission and complications and to evaluate the incidence, management, and long-term outcome of the two previously described subgroups of patients.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical series that defined remission according to the 2010 biochemical criteria.
RESULTS: We included 13 studies (1105 patients). The pooled rate of overall surgical remission was 54.8 % (95 % CI 44.4-65.2 %), and 72.2 % with previous criteria. Remission was achieved in 77.9 % (95 % CI 68.1-87.6 %) of microadenomas; 52.7 % (95 % CI 41-64.4 %) of macroadenomas; 29 % (95 % CI 20.1-37.8 %) of invasive and 68.8 % (95 % CI 60-77.6 %) of non-invasive adenomas. Complication rates were 1.2 % (95 % CI 0.6-1.9 %) for CSF leak, 1.3 % (95 % CI 0.6-2.1 %) for permanent diabetes insipidus, 8.7 % (95 % CI 4.8-12.5 %) for new anterior pituitary dysfunction and 0.6 % (95 % CI 0.1-1.1 %) for severe intraoperative hemorrhage. We identified an intermediate group of patients, defined as: (1) Remission according to one, but not the other biochemical criteria (GH or IGF-1) or 2010 criteria (14.3 % and 47.1 % cases), (2) Remission according to 2000, but not 2010 criteria (13.2-58.8 % cases). Two studies reported a remission rate of 56.5 % and 100 %, in the two subgroups respectively, in a long-term outcome without adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall remission with transsphenoidal surgery is achieved in ∼55 % of patients. For the intermediate group of patients, future prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to determine the long-term biochemical remission rates and clinical implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromegaly; Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma; Remission; Transsphenoidal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586125     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-2903-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Mahmoud Messerer; Giulia Cossu; Mercy George; Roy Thomas Daniel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Predictors of postoperative biochemical remission in lower Knosp grade growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: a large single center study.

Authors:  S Zhang; J Chen; Y Zhu; H Wang; Z Mao; S Yao; F Akter; Z Wang; B Hu; D Zhu; C Duan; W Chen
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.467

3.  Predictors for Remission after Transsphenoidal Surgery in Acromegaly: A Dutch Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Eva C Coopmans; Mark R Postma; Thalijn L C Wolters; Sebastiaan W F van Meyel; Romana Netea-Maier; André P van Beek; Sebastian J C M M Neggers
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Endoscopic, Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Tumors of the Sellar and Suprasellar Region: A Monocentric Historical Cohort Study of 369 Patients.

Authors:  Laura Van Gerven; Zhen Qian; Anastasiya Starovoyt; Mark Jorissen; Jeroen Meulemans; Johannes van Loon; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Julie Lambert; Marie Bex; Vincent Vander Poorten
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prospective intraoperative and histologic evaluation of cavernous sinus medial wall invasion by pituitary adenomas and its implications for acromegaly remission outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohyeldin; Laurence J Katznelson; Andrew R Hoffman; Karam Asmaro; Saman S Ahmadian; Mostafa M Eltobgy; Jayakar V Nayak; Zara M Patel; Peter H Hwang; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Surgery for acromegaly: Indications and goals.

Authors:  David P Bray; Sai Mannam; Rima S Rindler; Joseph W Quillin; Nelson M Oyesiku
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.055

7.  Surgical management of giant pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: Meta-analysis and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Giulia Cossu; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Luigi M Cavallo; Sebastien Froelich; Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Ethan Harel; Diego Mazzatenta; Micheal Bruneau; Torstein R Meling; Moncef Berhouma; Ari G Chacko; Jan F Cornelius; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Henry W S Schroeder; Idoya Zazpe; Romain Manet; Paul A Gardner; Henry Dufour; Paolo Cappabianca; Roy T Daniel; Mahmoud Messerer
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-03-28

8.  Predictors of Postoperative Diabetes Insipidus Following Endoscopic Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Pratima Nayak; Alaa S Montaser; Jie Hu; Daniel M Prevedello; Lawrence S Kirschner; Luma Ghalib
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-07-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.