Literature DB >> 27585473

Calculation of distribution coefficients in the SAMPL5 challenge from atomic solvation parameters and surface areas.

Diogo Santos-Martins1, Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes2, Maria João Ramos2.   

Abstract

In the context of SAMPL5, we submitted blind predictions of the cyclohexane/water distribution coefficient (D) for a series of 53 drug-like molecules. Our method is purely empirical and based on the additive contribution of each solute atom to the free energy of solvation in water and in cyclohexane. The contribution of each atom depends on the atom type and on the exposed surface area. Comparatively to similar methods in the literature, we used a very small set of atomic parameters: only 10 for solvation in water and 1 for solvation in cyclohexane. As a result, the method is protected from overfitting and the error in the blind predictions could be reasonably estimated. Moreover, this approach is fast: it takes only 0.5 s to predict the distribution coefficient for all 53 SAMPL5 compounds, allowing its application in virtual screening campaigns. The performance of our approach (submission 49) is modest but satisfactory in view of its efficiency: the root mean square error (RMSE) was 3.3 log D units for the 53 compounds, while the RMSE of the best performing method (using COSMO-RS) was 2.1 (submission 16). Our method is implemented as a Python script available at https://github.com/diogomart/SAMPL5-DC-surface-empirical .

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R; Distribution coefficient; Drug design data resource; Free energy of solvation; SAMPL5; Solvent accessible area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585473     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9951-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  17 in total

1.  Calculation of the free energy of solvation for neutral analogs of amino acid side chains.

Authors:  Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Fast estimation of solvation free energies for diverse chemical species.

Authors:  Robert D Boyer; Richard L Bryan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Marenich; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.

Authors:  Jianfeng Pei; Qi Wang; Jiaju Zhou; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

5.  A novel method for high throughput lipophilicity determination by microscale shake flask and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Baiwei Lin; Joseph H Pease
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  Development of reliable aqueous solubility models and their application in druglike analysis.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; George Krudy; Tingjun Hou; Wei Zhang; George Holland; Xiaojie Xu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides.

Authors:  T Ooi; M Oobatake; G Némethy; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding.

Authors:  D Eisenberg; A D McLachlan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jan 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  1 in total

1.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.