Literature DB >> 27585470

The effect of a performance-based intra-procedural checklist on a simulated emergency laparoscopic task in novice surgeons.

Michael El Boghdady1, Benjie Tang2, Afshin Alijani2.   

Abstract

Surgical checklists are in use as means to reduce errors. Checklists are infrequently applied during emergency situations in surgery. We aimed to study the effect of a simple self-administered performance-based checklist on the laparoscopic task when applied during an emergency-simulated scenario. The aviation checklist for unexpected situations is commonly used for simulated training of pilots to handle emergency during flights. This checklist was adopted for use as a standardised-performance-based checklist during emergency surgical tasks. Thirty consented laparoscopic novices were exposed unexpectedly to a bleeding vessel in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator as an emergency scenario. The task consisted of using laparoscopic clips to achieve haemostasis. Subjects were randomly allocated into two equal groups; those using the checklist that was applied once every 20 s (checklist group) and those without (control group). The checklist group performed significantly better in 5 out of 7 technical factors when compared to the control group: right instrument path length (m), median (IQR) 1.44 [1.22] versus 2.06 [1.70] (p = 0.029), right instrument angular path (degree) 312.10 (269.44 versus 541.80 [455.16] (p = 0.014), left instrument path length (m) 1.20 [0.60] versus 2.08 [2.02] (p = 0.004), and left instrument angular path (degree) 277.62 [132.11] versus 385.88 [428.42] (p = 0.017). The checklist group committed significantly fewer number of errors in the application of haemostatic clips, 3 versus 28 (p = 0.006). Although statistically not significant, total blood loss (lit) decreased in the checklist group from 0.83 [1.23] to 0.78 [0.28] (p = 0.724) and total time (sec) from 186.51 [145.69] to 125.14 [101.46] (p = 0.165). The performance-based intra-procedural checklist significantly enhanced the surgical task performance of novices in an emergency-simulated scenario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklist; Emergency; Laparoscopic; Simulation; Surgery; Task performance; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585470     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5223-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A 10-step intraoperative surgical checklist (ISC) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-can it really reduce conversion rates to open cholecystectomy?

Authors:  William B Robb; Gavin A Falk; John O Larkin; Ronan Waldron; Ronan P Waldron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.

Authors:  Alex B Haynes; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Abdel-Hadi S Breizat; E Patchen Dellinger; Teodoro Herbosa; Sudhir Joseph; Pascience L Kibatala; Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Alan F Merry; Krishna Moorthy; Richard K Reznick; Bryce Taylor; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The design, development, and implementation of a checklist for intraoperative neuromonitoring changes.

Authors:  John E Ziewacz; Sigurd H Berven; Valli P Mummaneni; Tsung-Hsi Tu; Olaolu C Akinbo; Russ Lyon; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  The effect of divided attention on novices and experts in laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  Mudassar Ali Ghazanfar; Malcolm Cook; Benjie Tang; Iain Tait; Afshin Alijani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; J E Smith; C E Wright
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.

Authors:  John E Ziewacz; Alexander F Arriaga; Angela M Bader; William R Berry; Lizabeth Edmondson; Judith M Wong; Stuart R Lipsitz; David L Hepner; Sarah Peyre; Steven Nelson; Daniel J Boorman; Douglas S Smink; Stanley W Ashley; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists.

Authors:  Alexander F Arriaga; Angela M Bader; Judith M Wong; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; John E Ziewacz; David L Hepner; Daniel J Boorman; Charles N Pozner; Douglas S Smink; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.