| Literature DB >> 27583407 |
Meng-Tzu Hu1,2, Ar-Tyan Hsu3,4, Fong-Chin Su1,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Thumb problems are common in some health professionals such as physical therapists. The purpose of this case-control study is to investigate the influence of clinical experience and different mobilization techniques on the kinematics of the thumb.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27583407 PMCID: PMC5008622 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The local coordinate systems of the right thumb segments were shown.
X axis = dorsal/ volar axis; Y axis = distal/proximal axis; Z axis = ulnar/radial axis
Fig 2Three PA glide techniques were performed on the load cell.
(A) T1, unsupported PA glide; (B) T2, digits supported PA glide; (C) T3, PA glide with IP joint supported by the index finger.
Demographic Description of the participants.
| Basic data | Novice Group (N = 23) | Experienced Group (N = 15) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 21.1 (2.2) | 28.0 (2.1) |
| Gender (male / female) | 12 / 11 | 5 / 10 |
| Height (cm) | 168.2 (7.3) | 162.9 (8.0) |
| Weight (kg) | 61.5 (17.0) | 56.9 (12.1) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.5 (4.3) | 21.3 (3.3) |
| Clinical experience (years) | 0.0 (0.0) | 4.3 (1.4) |
| Beighton score | ||
| Normal | 6 (26.1%) | 8 (53.3%) |
| Lax | 7 (30.4%) | 3 (20.0%) |
| Hyperlax | 10 (43.5%) | 4 (26.7%) |
NOTE. Values are mean (SD) or as otherwise indicated. Normal: with a Beighton score of 0 or 1; Lax: with a Beighton score of 2 or 3; Hyperlax: with a Beighton score of 4 or more. No significant difference between two groups in Beighton score with χ2 = 2.902; p = 0.234
* p<0.01
Descriptive statistics of thumb flexion/extension joint angles (degrees) while performing three techniques at maximal force.
| Novice Group (N = 23) | Experienced Group (N = 15) | Technique effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | ||||
| T1 | -6.073 (28.313) | -19.800 (29.306) | F = 2.175 p = 0.122 | |
| T2 | 0.817 (28.834) | -16.441 (33.256) | ||
| T3 | -10.453 (21.931) | -25.239 (21.310) | ||
| Group effect | F = 2.753 p = 0.107 | |||
| MCP | ||||
| T1 | -10.186 (26.470) | -18.679 (24.014) | F = 15.806 p < 0.001 | |
| T2 | -21.830 (20.002) | -14.302 (21.937) | ||
| T3 | 7.904 (20.648) | 11.979 (18.183) | ||
| Group effect | F = 0.040 p = 0.844 | |||
| CMC | ||||
| T1 | -1.112 (13.647) | 10.121 (11.416) | F = 0.089 p = 0.915 | |
| T2 | -0.089 (13.330) | 5.978 (15.604) | ||
| T3 | 0.723 (10.457) | 8.133 (13.156) | ||
| Group effect | F = 7.593 p = 0.010 | |||
NOTE. The values of each kinematic variable are expressed as means (SD). A positive angle indicates flexion, and a negative angle indicates extension. Differences are listed (1) between Experienced Group and Novice Group, (2) among the three mobilization techniques.
Abbreviations: T1, unsupported PA glide; T2, PA glide with digital supported; T3, PA glide with IP joint supported by the index.
* p<0.05
† p<0.01
Fig 3Correlations of the thumb IP and MCP joints as well as the MCP and CMC joints while performing three PA glide techniques with maximum effort in both groups.
The positive angle indicates flexion, and the negative angle indicates extension.
Number of thumbs (n) of the thumb alignments which were categorized according to the positions of the IP, MCP and CMC joints (IP-MCP-CMC) during maximal performance of PA glide mobilization in both groups.
| IP-MCP-CMC | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novice (N = 23) | Experienced (N = 14) | Novice (N = 23) | Experienced (N = 15) | Novice (N = 23) | Experienced (N = 15) | |
| E-E-F | 4 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| E-E-E | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | ||
| E-F-F | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| E-F-E | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| F-E-F | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | |
| F-E-E | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | ||
| F-F-F | 1 | 1 | ||||
| F-F-E | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
NOTE. The values of each thumb alignment are the numbers of each group.
Abbreviations: T1, unsupported PA glide; T2, PA glide with digital supported; T3, PA glide with IP joint supported by the index; E, extension; F, flexion.