Literature DB >> 14988049

Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice.

W G Darling1, J D Cooke.   

Abstract

We studied variability in movement phase plane trajectories (velocity-position relation) during movement. Human subjects performed 10 degrees and 30 degrees elbow flexion and extension movements in a visual step tracking paradigm. The area of ellipses with radii equal to one standard deviation in position and velocity was taken as a measure of trajectory variability. Trajectory variability was determined at 10-ms intervals throughout movements. Trajectory variability in both the acceleration and deceleration phases of movement decreased with practice. The average trajectory variability during deceleration was greater than that during acceleration even after extended practice (1000 trials). During practice, subjects usually increased movement speed while maintaining end-position accuracy. Trajectory variability was also related to movement speed when equal amounts of practice were given. Short duration (fast) movements had greater trajectory variability than long duration movements. Thus there is a tradeoff between movement speed and trajectory variability similar to the classical speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trajectory variability increased rapidly during the acceleratory phase of movement. The rate of increase was positively related to both movement amplitude and speed. Thus, the forces producing limb acceleration were variable and this variability was more marked in faster and larger movements. In contrast, trajectory variability increased more slowly or actually decreased during the deceleratory phase of movements. Forces involved in limb deceleration thus appeared to compensate to a greater or lesser degree for the variability in accelerative forces. The experiments indicate that the entire trajectory of simple limb movements is controlled by the central nervous system. Variations in accelerative forces may be compensated for by associated variations in decelerative forces. The linkage between accelerative and decelerative forces is progressively refined with practice resulting in decreased variability of the movement trajectory.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 14988049     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  26 in total

1.  Basic functions of variability of simple pre-planned movements.

Authors:  S R Gutman; G L Gottlieb
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Learning a throwing task is associated with differential changes in the use of motor abundance.

Authors:  J-F Yang; J P Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Endpoint accuracy for a small and a large hand muscle in young and old adults during rapid, goal-directed isometric contractions.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Joel A Enoka; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematic analysis of the formation of precise instrumental movements in cats.

Authors:  B M Sidorov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1991 May-Jun

5.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

6.  The variability of the serve toss in tennis under the influence of artificial crosswind.

Authors:  Pedro C Mendes; Juan P Fuentes; Rui Mendes; Fernando M L Martins; Filipe M Clemente; Micael S Couceiro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Emergent flexibility in motor learning.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Patterns of coordinated multi-joint movement.

Authors:  P Haggard; K Hutchinson; J Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differential control of task and null space variability in response to changes in task difficulty when learning a bimanual steering task.

Authors:  Rakshith Lokesh; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Muscle force and movement variability before and after total knee arthroplasty: A review.

Authors:  Jessica W Smith; Jesse C Christensen; Robin L Marcus; Paul C LaStayo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.