Literature DB >> 34659484

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Betty Zhang1, Gavinn Niroopan2, Chetan Gohal2, Bashar Alolabi2, Timothy Leroux3, Moin Khan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion.
RESULTS: Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; bone deficiency; bone grafting; total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 34659484      PMCID: PMC8512982          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220917653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  29 in total

1.  Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Karem Slim; Emile Nini; Damien Forestier; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use.

Authors:  Christopher R Constant; Christian Gerber; Roger J H Emery; Jens Ole Søjbjerg; Frank Gohlke; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Peter Habermeyer; Sven Lichtenberg; Mark Tauber; Petra Magosch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Long-term survival of the glenoid components in total shoulder replacement for arthritis.

Authors:  Dominique F Gazielly; Marius M Scarlat; Olivier Verborgt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Long-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty following bone-grafting of the glenoid.

Authors:  J M Hill; T R Norris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  W P Barrett; J L Franklin; S E Jackins; C R Wyss; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Posterior glenoid bone grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe posterior glenoid wear.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Allison J Rao; Patrick O'Donnell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Marilee P Horan; Karen K Briggs; Tyler R Richardson; James O'Holleran; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  [Constant Score and Neer Score. A comparison of score results and subjective patient satisfaction].

Authors:  M Tingart; H Bäthis; R Lefering; B Bouillon; T Tiling
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.