| Literature DB >> 27582873 |
N Salmanikhas1, M Tizghadam1, A Rashidi Mehrabadi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, a hybrid treatment system (Fluidized Bed positioned in a biological reactor of an Activated Sludge process) was used to treat saline domestic wastewater. The performance of the mentioned hybrid system was compared with the conventional activated sludge. A pilot study was conducted, and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and pH were measured to investigate treatment efficiency. Three saline wastewater samples with salt concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 % and detention times of 2, 4 and 6 h were loaded into both rectors of hybrid system and activated sludge.Entities:
Keywords: Activated sludge; Hybrid growth; Saline municipal wastewater
Year: 2016 PMID: 27582873 PMCID: PMC5006585 DOI: 10.1186/s13036-016-0030-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Eng ISSN: 1754-1611 Impact factor: 4.355
Operational conditions for hybrid and conventional systems in saline wastewater treatment
| Days | TDS (mg/l) | HRT (h) | % Qin | COD (mg/l) | BOD5 (mg/l) | NH+ 4 (mg/l) | TP (mg/l) | pH | EC (μs/cm) | Cl−(mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–20 | 0.5 | 2 | 25 | 414 ± 40 | 242.6 ± 3.7 | 27.3 ± 5 | 11.8 ± 1.7 | 8 ± 0.5 | 9030 ± 121.2 | 2438.3 ± 131.7 |
| 21–40 | 0.5 | 4 | 50 | 413 ± 11.1 | 240 ± 11.7 | 25.6 ± 6.1 | 11.1 ± 2.4 | 7.9 ± 0.3 | 8966.6 ± 152.7 | 2422.3 ± 133.6 |
| 41–60 | 0.5 | 6 | 75 | 383.3 ± 7.6 | 253.3 ± 17.5 | 16.1 ± 1 | 10 ± 2 | 8 ± 0.3 | 9073.3 ± 125 | 2463.3 ± 62.5 |
| 61–80 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 396 ± 37.3 | 262.3 ± 37.6 | 20 ± 2 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | 18083.3 ± 104.08 | 5197.3 ± 92.6 |
| 81–100 | 1 | 4 | 75 | 439.3 ± 27.6 | 244 ± 13.8 | 26 ± 3.6 | 8.5 ± 0.6 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 18,000 ± 100 | 5257.3 ± 161.1 |
| 101–120 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 418.3 ± 55.3 | 230.3 ± 17.7 | 25 ± 5.2 | 13.9 ± 0.4 | 8.4 ± 0.3 | 18,350 ± 132.2 | 5017.3 ± 275.8 |
| 121–140 | 1.5 | 2 | 75 | 380.6 ± 17.7 | 247.3 ± 34.4 | 27.3 ± 6.0 | 13.2 ± 1.1 | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 27383.3 ± 104 | 8110 ± 252.8 |
| 141–160 | 1.5 | 4 | 25 | 408.3 ± 16.5 | 286.3 ± 9.8 | 28.8 ± 5.6 | 11.9 ± 0.6 | 8.6 ± 0.2 | 27233.3 ± 251.6 | 8289.6 ± 264 |
| 161–180 | 1.5 | 6 | 50 | 393.3 ± 25.9 | 249 ± 33 | 21 ± 4.3 | 11.4 ± 0.9 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 27516.6 ± 104 | 8420.6 ± 91.8 |
Fig. 1schematic pilot plant
Fig. 2Variations of COD concentration during the operation of hybrid and conventional reactors
Fig. 3The diagram of variations in MLSS concentration during the operation
Fig. 4Variations of BOD5 concentration during the operation of hybrid and conventional reactors
Fig. 5Variations in NH4 + concentration during the operation of the hybrid and conventional reactors
Fig. 6Variations of phosphorus concentration during the operation of the hybrid and conventional reactors