A R Mothes1, T Lehmann2, A Kwetkat3, M P Radosa1, I B Runnebaum1. 1. Universitätsfrauenklinik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena. 2. Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Dokumentation, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena. 3. Klinik für Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare very elderly female patients with a younger control group after prolapse surgery with regard to co-morbidity and complications. METHOD: In a case-control design, the consecutive data of patients after prolapse surgery at the age of over 80 years and those of a control group were analysed by means of the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale Geriatrics (CIRS-G). Statistics: Student's t, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The analysis comprised n = 57 vs. n = 60 operations. In the very elderly patients there was often a grade IV prolapse (p < 0.001), apical fixations were more frequent (p < 0.001), but the operating times were not different. In the very elderly patients 21 % CD II+III complications were observed, in the control group 6.6 % (p = 0.031). No CD IV and V complications occurred in either group, the duration of inpatient stay amounted to 5 (± 1) vs. 4.1 (± 0.8; p < 0.001) days, the very elderly patients needed an inpatient follow-up more frequently (p < 0.001). The co-morbidities of the very elderly patients differed from those of the control group in number (median 2.0 vs. 1.5; p < 0.001), in CIRS-G (4.1 ± 2.2 vs. 2.4 ± 1.7; p < 0.01) and in Charlson Index (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A prolapse in very elderly women can be safely managed by surgery. In no case did the complications require intensive care treatment nor were they life-threatening, but they did lead to a longer duration of hospital stay and more frequently to further treatment geriatric or inpatient internal medicine facilities.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare very elderly female patients with a younger control group after prolapse surgery with regard to co-morbidity and complications. METHOD: In a case-control design, the consecutive data of patients after prolapse surgery at the age of over 80 years and those of a control group were analysed by means of the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale Geriatrics (CIRS-G). Statistics: Student's t, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The analysis comprised n = 57 vs. n = 60 operations. In the very elderly patients there was often a grade IV prolapse (p < 0.001), apical fixations were more frequent (p < 0.001), but the operating times were not different. In the very elderly patients 21 % CD II+III complications were observed, in the control group 6.6 % (p = 0.031). No CD IV and V complications occurred in either group, the duration of inpatient stay amounted to 5 (± 1) vs. 4.1 (± 0.8; p < 0.001) days, the very elderly patients needed an inpatient follow-up more frequently (p < 0.001). The co-morbidities of the very elderly patients differed from those of the control group in number (median 2.0 vs. 1.5; p < 0.001), in CIRS-G (4.1 ± 2.2 vs. 2.4 ± 1.7; p < 0.01) and in Charlson Index (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A prolapse in very elderly women can be safely managed by surgery. In no case did the complications require intensive care treatment nor were they life-threatening, but they did lead to a longer duration of hospital stay and more frequently to further treatment geriatric or inpatient internal medicine facilities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clavien-Dindo classification system; co-morbidity; prolapse surgery; surgical complications; very elderly people
Authors: M D Miller; C F Paradis; P R Houck; S Mazumdar; J A Stack; A H Rifai; B Mulsant; C F Reynolds Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Vivian W Sung; Sherry Weitzen; Eric R Sokol; Charles R Rardin; Deborah L Myers Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kevin J Stepp; Matthew D Barber; Eun-Hee Yoo; James L Whiteside; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Mark D Walters Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 8.661