Literature DB >> 2758172

Motor responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and body to intraluminal acid.

N A Andreollo1, D G Thompson, G P Kendall, A S McIntyre, R J Earlam.   

Abstract

1. It is known that contraction of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and secondary peristalsis protect the airway and clear the esophagus of refluxed gastric contents. However, the exact nature of the stimulus and the role of acid remain controversial. 2. Secondary peristalsis and UES responses were measured following the intraluminal infusion of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and equiosmolar NaCl solutions in seven normal volunteers. The protocol consisted of three phases: infusion of increasing volumes (1, 3, 5 and 7 ml per min), infusion of a given volume (7 ml per min) at different stimulation sites and balloon distension. 3. At the proximal esophagus the UES response to both solutions was similar, rising from a basal resting pressure of 30 mmHg to 70 mmHg for both HCl (range 60-85 mmHg) and NaCl (55-85 mmHg). The magnitude of the response decreased as the distance from the UES increased. The level of response decreased to 40 mmHg for both NaCl and HCl (range 30-60 mmHg) at the distal esophagus. These responses were also volume dependent. When the solutions were infused at 7 ml/min into either the proximal or distal esophagus, the sphincter pressure increased with increased volume to 65 mmHg for HCl (range 50-85 mmHg) and 60 mmHg for NaCl (range 50-80 mmHg). Secondary peristalsis was also induced by the two solutions. The level of response again decreased as the distance from the UES increased. This response was also volume dependent. Esophageal distension by a balloon positioned 10 cm below the sphincter induced secondary peristalsis and sphincter response identical to those induced by the infusion of fluid. 4. These results indicate that the principal stimulus for recruitment of the esophageal motor clearance mechanism is intraluminal distension and not necessarily the pressure of intraluminal acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2758172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  6 in total

1.  Modulation of activity in swallowing motor cortex following esophageal acidification: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Peter A Paine; Shaheen Hamdy; Xavier Chitnis; Lloyd J Gregory; Vincent Giampietro; Mick Brammer; Steve Williams; Qasim Aziz
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Upper esophageal sphincter during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation: effects of reflux content and posture.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Valmik Bhargava; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Older Age Reduces Upper Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Body Responses to Simulated Slow and Ultraslow Reflux Events and Post-Reflux Residue.

Authors:  Ling Mei; Arshish Dua; Mark Kern; Siyuan Gao; Francis Edeani; Kulwinder Dua; Amy Wilson; Shaina Lynch; Patrick Sanvanson; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Response of the upper esophageal sphincter to esophageal distension is affected by posture, velocity, volume, and composition of the infusate.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Kulwinder Dua; Sohrab Rahimi Naini; Justin Lee; Omar Katib; Ke Yan; Raymond Hoffmann; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Effects of esophageal acidification on esophageal reflexes controlling the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang; Bidyut K Medda; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.052

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.