Literature DB >> 27581236

Growing concern following compression mammography.

Johannes Pieter van Netten1, Stephen Hoption Cann2, Ian Thornton1, Rory Finegan1.   

Abstract

A patient without clinical symptoms had a mammogram in October 2008. The procedure caused intense persistent pain, swelling and development of a haematoma following mediolateral left breast compression. Three months later, a 9×11 cm mass developed within the same region. Core biopsies showed a necrotizing high-grade ductal carcinoma, with a high mitotic index. Owing to its extensive size, the patient began chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab and later radiotherapy to obtain clear margins for a subsequent mastectomy. The mastectomy in October 2009 revealed an inflammatory carcinoma, with 2 of 3 nodes infiltrated by the tumour. The stage IIIC tumour, oestrogen and progesterone receptor negative, was highly HER2 positive. A recurrence led to further chemotherapy in February 2011. In July 2011, another recurrence was removed from the mastectomy scar. She died of progressive disease in 2012. In this article, we discuss the potential influence of compression on the natural history of the tumour. 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581236      PMCID: PMC5015182          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  17 in total

1.  Does mammography hurt?

Authors:  Rama Sapir; Michael Patlas; Shalom David Strano; Irit Hadas-Halpern; Nathan I Cherny
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  False-positive breast screening due to fat necrosis following mammography.

Authors:  Jennifer N Cawson; Frank A Malara
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2004-06

3.  Comparison of clinical-pathologic characteristics and outcomes of true interval and screen-detected invasive breast cancer among participants of a Canadian breast screening program: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Daniel Rayson; Jennifer Isabelle Payne; Mohamed Abdolell; Penny J Barnes; Rebecca F MacIntosh; Theresa Foley; Tallal Younis; Ariel Burns; Judy Caines
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Rupture of a cyst during compression at mammography. Report of a case.

Authors:  R Novak
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Disappearing breast masses caused by compression during mammography.

Authors:  D R Pennes; M J Homer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme.

Authors:  W K Cowan; B Angus; J C Gray; L G Lunt; S R al-Tamimi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Stimulation of tumour angiogenesis by proximal wounds: spatial and temporal analysis by MRI.

Authors:  R Abramovitch; M Marikovsky; G Meir; M Neeman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and interval breast cancer in a population-based cancer registry study.

Authors:  Antonino Musolino; Maria Michiara; Giovanni Maria Conti; Daniela Boggiani; Marella Zatelli; Dario Palleschi; Maria Angela Bella; Paolo Sgargi; Beatrice Di Blasio; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Hematoma formation during breast core needle biopsy in women taking antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  Alison L Chetlen; Claudia Kasales; Julie Mack; Susann Schetter; Junjia Zhu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  SDF-1α mediates wound-promoted tumor growth in a syngeneic orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina H Stuelten; Frances N Cervoni-Curet; Johanna I Busch; Emily Sutton; Joshua D Webster; Sandra L Kavalukas; Lalage M Wakefield; Adrian Barbul; John E Niederhuber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.