Literature DB >> 23789678

Hematoma formation during breast core needle biopsy in women taking antithrombotic therapy.

Alison L Chetlen1, Claudia Kasales, Julie Mack, Susann Schetter, Junjia Zhu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare hematoma formation after breast core needle biopsy performed on patients undergoing and those not undergoing concurrent antithrombotic therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective assessment of core needle biopsies (stereotactic, ultrasound guided, or MRI guided) performed on patients enrolled between September 2011 and July 2012 formed the basis of this study. Postprocedure mediolateral and craniocaudal mammograms were evaluated for the presence and size of hematomas. Patients were clinically evaluated for complications 24-48 hours after the procedure through telephone call or face-to-face consultation. Needle size, type of biopsy, and presence of hematoma and documented complications were correlated with use of antithrombotic agents (including aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, and daily nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications).
RESULTS: No clinically significant hematomas or bleeding complications were found. Eighty-nine of 617 (14.4%) non-clinically significant hematomas were detected on postprocedure mammograms. The probability of development of a non-clinically significant hematoma was 21.6% for patients taking antithrombotics and 13.0% for those not taking antithrombotics. Concurrent antithrombotic therapy and larger needle gauge were significant factors contributing to the probability of hematoma formation. The volume of the hematoma was not related to needle gauge or presence of antithrombotic therapy.
CONCLUSION: No clinically significant hematomas were found. Because there are potential life-threatening risks to stopping antithrombotic therapy before breast biopsy, withholding antithrombotic therapy for core needle breast biopsy is not recommended because the incidence of non-clinically significant hematoma is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23789678     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Growing concern following compression mammography.

Authors:  Johannes Pieter van Netten; Stephen Hoption Cann; Ian Thornton; Rory Finegan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 2.  Risk of bleeding associated with interventional musculoskeletal radiology procedures. A comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Gregory B Foremny; Juan Pretell-Mazzini; Jean Jose; Ty K Subhawong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Costly coagulation profile tests prior to performing breast biopsies. Do we really need it?

Authors:  Laila K Ashkar; Rawan M Hafiz
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Is breast cancer surgery safely performed in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy?

Authors:  Norio Emoto; Takahisa Fujikawa; Yasunori Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Kawamoto; Akira Tanaka
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Preprocedural Hypertension Is Not a Risk Factor for Postoperative Bleeding following Image-Guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Ninad Salastekar; Alexis Saunders; Kushal Patel; Katherine Willer
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 6.  Postoperative Fluid Collections in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dylan Smith; Galen Berdis; Vishavpreet Singh; Alexander Caughran; Matthew Bullock
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.