| Literature DB >> 27581163 |
Yury Oliveira Chaves1, Allyson Guimarães da Costa2,3,4, Marcelo Luís Monteiro Pereira5, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães de Lacerda1,2,3, Jordana Grazziela Coelho-Dos-Reis6, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho6, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho6, Adriana Malheiro4,7, Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro2,3, Patrícia Puccinelli Orlandi1, Claudio Romero Farias Marinho5, Paulo Afonso Nogueira8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax is the causative agent of human malaria of large geographic distribution, with 35 million cases annually. In Brazil, it is the most prevalent species, being responsible by around 70 % of the malaria cases.Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ T-cells; CD8+ T-cells; Interleukin-10; Malaria; Plasmodium vivax; Recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27581163 PMCID: PMC5007810 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1501-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Compendium of the study population. The study enrolled malaria patients seeking for healthcare at the Ambulatory of the Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado (FMT-HVD), Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil. The patient selection was performed by convenience. From the 68 patients participating in the initial inquiry, fifty-five were selected and included in the study, as patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (parasitaemia was above 500 parasites/mm3). The selected patients were grouped as: primary malaria (n = 36) and recurrent malaria (n = 19) as described in “Methods” section. Twenty healthy individuals living in the same endemic area and with no history of malaria were invited to participate as endemic controls
Demographic and haematological parameters of the study population
| Endemic control (n = 20) | Primary malaria (n = 36) | Recurrent malaria (n = 19) | p value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 27.1 (7.4) | 35.4 (14.3) | 39.5 (12.0) |
|
| Man/woman (%) | 45/55 | 64/36 | 85/15 | – |
| Malaria episodesa | – | – | 3.0 (1.5–4.0) | – |
| Last malaria attackb | – | – | 4.0 (3.0–6.0) | – |
| Haematological parametersc | ||||
| RBC × 103/mm3 | 4.8 (4.5–5.4) | 4.7 (4.2–5.3) | 5.0 (4.4–5.2) | 0.839 |
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.2 (12.5–14.1) | 13.4 (11.5–14.4) | 13.1 (12.2–14.1) | 0.592 |
| Haematocrit (%) | 43.9 (40.5–46.8) | 41.9 (36.5–45.7) | 42.0 (39–46.5) | 0.461 |
| Platelets × 103/mm3 | 289.0 (212.5–325.2) | 69.0 (37.8–100.5)d | 112.0 (53–120)d |
|
| WBC × 103/mm3 | 6.7 (6.1–7.8) | 5.7 (4.0–7.3) | 5.6 (4.7–6.8) |
|
| Lymphocytes × 103/mm3 | 2.0 (1.6–2.6) | 1.3 (0.7–1.8)d | 1.0 (0.5–1.3)d |
|
| Monocytes × 103/mm3 | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) | 0.3 (0.2–0.5)d | 0.5 (0.3–0.9) |
|
| Neutrophils × 103/mm3 | 3.8 (3.5–5.1) | 3.3 (2.1–5.1) | 4.0 (3.0–4.7) | 0.436 |
Patients were grouped according to their malaria diagnosis based on microscopy data
aThe patients were tested at one time point and recurrent malaria episodes recorded
bTime in months
cData expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR25–IQR75)
dSignificant differences as compared to endemic controls
* Kruskal–Wallis analyses followed by Dunn’s post-test
Fig. 2Biomarker profiles of primary malaria vs recurrent malaria. The biomarker profiles were performed by converting the original data (leukocyte subsets and plasmatic cytokine profile), obtained as continuous variables, into categorical parameters. The results were reported as the proportion of subjects with high biomarker levels above the cut-offs calculated for the study population, as described in “Methods” section. The data were arranged as descendent biomarker profile for endemic controls (white bars), and used as reference curve (dotted line) for comparative analyses with malaria patients (primary malaria = light-gray bars and the recurrent malaria = dark-gray bars). The χ2 test was used to identify significant differences at p < 0.05. Asterisks represents the significance levels (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 and ***p < 0.0005). Significant differences between primary and recurrent malaria were represented by hash
Fig. 3Ex vivo phenotypic features of circulating T-cell subsets. The levels and activation status of T-cell subsets were assessed in patients with primary malaria, recurrent malaria as well as endemic controls, including: a CD4+ T-cells; b CD4+CD69+ T-cells; c %CD4+CD69+ T-cells, d CD8+ T-cells; e CD8+CD69+ T-cells; f %CD8+CD69+ T-cells. Data are displayed in boxplot format (min to max, IQR25-IQR75 and median) of absolute counts (a, b, d and e) and percentage (c and f) of T-cell subsets. Multiple comparisons amongst groups were performed by Kruskal–Wallis, followed by Dunn’s post-test. Significance differences are represented by *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 and ***p < 0.0005
Fig. 4Plasmatic cytokine profiles in primary malaria vs recurrent malaria. The plasmatic cytokine levels were quantified in patients with primary malaria, recurrent malaria as well as endemic controls, using cytometric bead array as described in “Methods” section. The analysis included: a IL-10; b IL-6; c IL-4; d IFN-γ; e TNF-α and f IL-2. Data are expressed in pg/mL. Multiple comparisons amongst clinical groups were performed by Kruskal–Wallis, followed by Dunn’s post-test. Significance differences are represented by *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 and ***p < 0.0005
Fig. 5Association between T-lymphocyte subsets, plasmatic IL-10 levels and number of recurrent malaria episodes. Spearman correlation analysis was applied to identify the association between the CD4+/CD8+ T-cells (ratio) and the plasmatic IL-10 levels (pg/mL) for a endemic controls, b primary malaria and c recurrent malaria. Assessment of the IL-10 levels related to the previous exposition to the malaria. Additional analysis of IL-10 levels (pg/mL) in malaria patients categorized according to the number of malaria episodes (primary, 2–3 recurrent and >4 recurrent episodes) as compared to endemic controls were also carried out (d). Data are displayed in boxplot format (min to max, IQR25-IQR75 and median). Multiple comparisons amongst clinical groups were performed by Kruskal–Wallis, followed by Dunn’s post-test. Significance differences are represented by *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 and ***p < 0.0005