Literature DB >> 25569434

Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany.

Franziska Severin1, Björn Stollenwerk1, Elke Holinski-Feder2, Elisabeth Meyer1, Volker Heinemann3, Clemens Giessen-Jung3, Wolf Rogowski1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lynch syndrome (LS) screening among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer can decrease mortality in their affected first-degree relatives. In Germany, it is not yet clinical practice and the cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies is unknown.
METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance system. A total of 22 testing strategies considering family-history assessment, analysis of tumor samples (i.e., immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability, and BRAF mutation testing) and genetic sequencing were analyzed. Life-years gained in relatives by closed-meshed colonoscopy and aspirin prophylaxis were estimated by Markov models. Uncertainty was assessed deterministically and probabilistically.
RESULTS: On average, detected mutation carriers gained 0.52 life-years (undiscounted: 1.34) by increased prevention. Most strategies were dominated, with three exceptions: family assessment by the Bethesda criteria followed by IHC and BRAF testing and genetic sequencing; IHC and BRAF testing and genetic sequencing; and direct sequencing of all index patients. Their incremental cost-effectiveness was [euro ]77,268, [euro ]253,258, and [euro ]4,188,036 per life-year gained, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results were less favorable than those of previous models. Chemoprevention appears to provide comparably low additional benefit and improves cost-effectiveness only slightly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25569434     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  33 in total

1.  Clinical impact of molecular genetic diagnosis, genetic counseling, and management of hereditary cancer. Part II: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma as a model.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P Watson; T G Shaw; J F Lynch; A E Harty; B A Franklin; C R Kapler; S T Tinley; B Liu; C Lerman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Recurrence and variability of germline EPCAM deletions in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Roland P Kuiper; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Ramprasath Venkatachalam; Danielle Bodmer; Eveline Hoenselaar; Monique Goossens; Aline Haufe; Eveline Kamping; Renée C Niessen; Frans B L Hogervorst; Johan J P Gille; Bert Redeker; Carli M J Tops; Marielle E van Gijn; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Nils Rahner; Verena Steinke; Philip Kahl; Elke Holinski-Feder; Monika Morak; Matthias Kloor; Susanne Stemmler; Beate Betz; Pierre Hutter; David J Bunyan; Sapna Syngal; Julie O Culver; Tracy Graham; Tsun L Chan; Iris D Nagtegaal; J Han J M van Krieken; Hans K Schackert; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Germany: Health system review.

Authors:  Reinhard Busse; Miriam Blümel
Journal:  Health Syst Transit       Date:  2014

4.  New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; H T Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of primary genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in the general population.

Authors:  Tuan A Dinh; Benjamin I Rosner; James C Atwood; C Richard Boland; Sapna Syngal; Hans F A Vasen; Stephen B Gruber; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-11-18

6.  Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore.

Authors:  Vivian Wei Wang; Poh Koon Koh; Wai Leng Chow; Jeremy Fung Yen Lim
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Improving identification of lynch syndrome patients: a comparison of research data with clinical records.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Julie McGaughran; Kaltin Ferguson; Michael D Walsh; Daniel D Buchanan; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Andreas Obermair; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Aspirin for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas: meta-analysis of the randomized trials.

Authors:  Bernard F Cole; Richard F Logan; Susan Halabi; Robert Benamouzig; Robert S Sandler; Matthew J Grainge; Stanislas Chaussade; John A Baron
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Cancer risk in a cohort of subjects carrying a single mismatch repair gene mutation.

Authors:  D A Stupart; P A Goldberg; U Algar; R Ramesar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  John Burn; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Finlay Macrae; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Gabriela Moeslein; Sylviane Olschwang; Diane Eccles; D Gareth Evans; Eamonn R Maher; Lucio Bertario; Marie-Luise Bisgaard; Malcolm G Dunlop; Judy W C Ho; Shirley V Hodgson; Annika Lindblom; Jan Lubinski; Patrick J Morrison; Victoria Murday; Raj Ramesar; Lucy Side; Rodney J Scott; Huw J W Thomas; Hans F Vasen; Gail Barker; Gillian Crawford; Faye Elliott; Mohammad Movahedi; Kirsi Pylvanainen; Juul T Wijnen; Riccardo Fodde; Henry T Lynch; John C Mathers; D Timothy Bishop
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  17 in total

1.  Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression.

Authors:  Verónica Cabreira; Carla Pinto; Manuela Pinheiro; Paula Lopes; Ana Peixoto; Catarina Santos; Isabel Veiga; Patrícia Rocha; Pedro Pinto; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders.

Authors:  Karl Johnson; Katherine W Saylor; Isabella Guynn; Karen Hicklin; Jonathan S Berg; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Cost-effectiveness of Active Identification and Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome Cases.

Authors:  Elisabeth F P Peterse; Steffie K Naber; Corinne Daly; Aaron Pollett; Lawrence F Paszat; Manon C W Spaander; Melyssa Aronson; Robert Gryfe; Linda Rabeneck; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  The cost-effectiveness of routine testing for Lynch syndrome in newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer in the United States: corrected estimates.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Glenn E Palomaki; Mercy Mvundura; Heather Hampel
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-24

6.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Erh Chen; Sung-Shuo Kao; Ren-Hua Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Clinical penetrance in hereditary hemochromatosis: estimates of the cumulative incidence of severe liver disease among HFE C282Y homozygotes.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Lyle C Gurrin; Nadine A Bertalli; Katrina J Allen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Anne Goverde; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Anja Wagner; Margot G F van Lier; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Carli M Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Winand N M Dinjens; Monique E van Leerdam; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Epidemiology matters: peering inside the "black box" in economic evaluations of genetic testing.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Genomic sequencing in clinical practice: applications, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  Joel B Krier; Sarah S Kalia; Robert C Green
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.