Literature DB >> 27581064

Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004-2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry.

Salih Samo1, Dustin A Carlson1, Dyanna L Gregory1, Susan H Gawel2, John E Pandolfino1, Peter J Kahrilas3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reported global incidence and prevalence values for achalasia vary widely, from 0.03 to 1.63 per 100,000 persons per year and from 1.8 to 12.6 per 100,000 persons per year, respectively. This study aimed to reconcile these low values with findings from a major referral center, in central Chicago (which began using high-resolution manometry in 2004 and used it in all clinical studies since 2005), and has determined the incidence and prevalence of achalasia to be much greater.
METHODS: We collected data from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse database (tertiary care setting) of adults residing in Chicago with an encounter diagnosis of achalasia from 2004 through 2014. Patient files were reviewed to confirm diagnosis and residential address. US Census Bureau population data were used as the population denominator. We assumed that we encountered every incident case in the city to calculate incidence and prevalence estimates. Data were analyzed for the city at large and for the 13 zip codes surrounding the Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), the NMH neighborhood.
RESULTS: We identified 379 cases (50.9% female) that met the full inclusion criteria; of these, 246 were incident cases. Among these, 132 patients resided in the NMH neighborhood, 89 of which were incident cases. Estimated yearly incidences were stable over the study period, ranging from 0.77 to 1.35 per 100,000 citywide (average, 1.07 per 100,000) and from 1.41 to 4.60 per 100,000 in the NMH neighborhood (average, 2.92 per 100,000). The corresponding prevalence values increased progressively, from 4.68 to 14.42 per 100,000 citywide and from 15.64 to 32.58 per 100,000 in the NMH neighborhood.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of achalasia in central Chicago diagnosed using state-of-the-art technology and diagnostic criteria are at least 2- to 3-fold greater than previous estimates. Additional studies are needed to determine the generalizability of these data to other regions.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Epidemiology; Incidence; Prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581064      PMCID: PMC5316341          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  20 in total

1.  Achalasia of the esophagus in a small urban community.

Authors:  R J Earlam; F H Ellis; F T Nobrega
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Achalasia: incidence and treatment in Virginia.

Authors:  E A Galen; D M Switz; A M Zfass
Journal:  Va Med       Date:  1982-03

3.  A prospective study of the clinical features, manometric findings, incidence and prevalence of achalasia in Singapore.

Authors:  K Y Ho; H H Tay; J Y Kang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Life expectancy, complications, and causes of death in patients with achalasia: results of a 33-year follow-up investigation.

Authors:  Volker F Eckardt; Tom Hoischen; Gudrun Bernhard
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; E W Cameron; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Variations in the prevalence of achalasia in Great Britain and Ireland: an epidemiological study based on hospital admissions.

Authors:  J F Mayberry; M Atkinson
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1987-01

8.  Achalasia in Zimbabwean blacks.

Authors:  C M Stein; M Gelfand; H G Taylor
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1985-02-16

9.  High-Resolution Manometry Improves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Laure Huot; Frank Zerbib; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Guillaume Gourcerol; Benoit Coffin; Alain Ropert; Adeline Roux; François Mion
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Achalasia in Korea: an epidemiologic study using a national healthcare database.

Authors:  Eunkyung Kim; Hongsub Lee; Hye-Kyung Jung; Kwang Jae Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  26 in total

1.  Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign".

Authors:  Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Tomohide Tanabe; Yuriko Hanada; Nana Takenouchi; Osamu Goto; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 2.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; André J P M Smout; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  POEM vs Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Fundoplication: Which Is Now the Gold Standard for Treatment of Achalasia?

Authors:  Marco G Patti; Ciro Andolfi; Steven P Bowers; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Editorial: Assessing Esophageal Function in Achalasia: The Old and the New.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  How I Approach Dysphagia.

Authors:  Jooho P Kim; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-08-20

7.  The treatment of achalasia patients with esophageal varices: an international study.

Authors:  M Pesce; C Magee; R H Holloway; C P Gyawali; S Roman; M Pioche; E Savarino; F Quader; G Sarnelli; S Sanagapalli; A J Bredenoord; R Sweis
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Epidemiological analysis of achalasia in Japan using a large-scale claims database.

Authors:  Hiroki Sato; Hiroshi Yokomichi; Kazuya Takahashi; Kentaro Tominaga; Takeshi Mizusawa; Naruhiro Kimura; Yuzo Kawata; Shuji Terai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Tailoring Therapy for Achalasia.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-05

10.  Epidemiologic and Economic Burden of Achalasia in the United States.

Authors:  Charles E Gaber; Swathi Eluri; Cary C Cotton; Paula D Strassle; Timothy M Farrell; Jennifer L Lund; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.