Literature DB >> 27580466

Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) hosts robust phyllosphere and rhizosphere bacterial communities when grown in soil amended with various organic and synthetic fertilizers.

Sarah M Allard1, Christopher S Walsh2, Anna E Wallis2, Andrea R Ottesen3, Eric W Brown3, Shirley A Micallef4.   

Abstract

Due to the intimate association between plants and their microbial symbionts, an examination of the influence of agricultural practices on phytobiome structure and diversity could foster a more comprehensive understanding of plant health and produce safety. Indeed, the impact of upstream crop producti006Fn practices cannot be overstated in their role in assuring an abundant and safe food supply. To assess whether fertilizer type impacted rhizosphere and phyllosphere bacterial communities associating with tomato plants, the bacterial microbiome of tomato cv. 'BHN602' grown in soils amended with fresh poultry litter, commercially available sterilized poultry litter pellets, vermicompost or synthetic fertilizer was described. Culture independent DNA was extracted from bulk and rhizosphere soils, and washes of tomato blossoms and ripe fruit. PCR amplicons of hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced and profiled using the QIIME pipeline. Bulk and rhizosphere soil, and blossom and fruit surfaces all supported distinct bacterial communities according to principal coordinate analysis and ANOSIM (R=0.87, p=0.001 in year 1; R=0.93, p=0.001 in year 2). Use of microbiologically diverse organic fertilizers generally did not influence bacterial diversity, community structure or relative abundance of specific taxa on any plant organ surface. However, statistically significant differences in sand and silt contents of soil (p<0.05) across the field and corresponding shifts in water activity were positively (R2=0.52, p=0.005) and negatively (R2=0.48, p=0.009) correlated with changes in bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere, respectively. Over two harvest seasons, this study demonstrated that the application of raw poultry manure, poultry litter pellets and vermicompost had little effect on the tomato microbiome in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere, when compared to synthetically fertilized plants. Plant anatomy, and other factors related to field location, possibly associated with edaphic and air characteristics, were more influential drivers of different tomato organ microbiomes than were diverse soil amendment applications. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flower microbiome; Fruit microbiome; Organic fertilization; Poultry manure; Soil characteristics; Vermicompost

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580466     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Barks from avocado trees of different geographic locations have consistent microbial communities.

Authors:  Eneas Aguirre-von-Wobeser; Alexandro Alonso-Sánchez; Alfonso Méndez-Bravo; Luis Alberto Villanueva Espino; Frédérique Reverchon
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Distinct Phyllosphere Microbiome of Wild Tomato Species in Central Peru upon Dysbiosis.

Authors:  Paul Runge; Eric Kemen; Freddy Ventura; Remco Stam
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Effects of Dairy Manure-Based Amendments and Soil Texture on Lettuce- and Radish-Associated Microbiota and Resistomes.

Authors:  Giselle K P Guron; Gustavo Arango-Argoty; Liqing Zhang; Amy Pruden; Monica A Ponder
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.389

4.  A preliminary examination of bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities inhabiting different rhizocompartments of tomato plants under real-world environments.

Authors:  Shin Ae Lee; Yiseul Kim; Jeong Myeong Kim; Bora Chu; Jae-Ho Joa; Mee Kyung Sang; Jaekyeong Song; Hang-Yeon Weon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Revealing the Variation and Stability of Bacterial Communities in Tomato Rhizosphere Microbiota.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Cheng; Shaonan Lei; Ye Li; Wei Huang; Rongqin Ma; Juan Xiong; Ting Zhang; Lingyue Jin; Hafeez Ul Haq; Xiaohong Xu; Baoyu Tian
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-25

6.  Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere of tomato plants.

Authors:  Chun-Juan Dong; Ling-Ling Wang; Qian Li; Qing-Mao Shang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exploring the Microbiota of East African Indigenous Leafy Greens for Plant Growth, Health, and Resilience.

Authors:  Julian Taffner; Olivia Laggner; Adrian Wolfgang; Danny Coyne; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Soil and Soilless Tomato Cultivation Promote Different Microbial Communities That Provide New Models for Future Crop Interventions.

Authors:  Alice Anzalone; Alexandros Mosca; Giulio Dimaria; Daniele Nicotra; Matilde Tessitori; Grete Francesca Privitera; Alfredo Pulvirenti; Cherubino Leonardi; Vittoria Catara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Response of Horticultural Soil Microbiota to Different Fertilization Practices.

Authors:  Iratxe Zarraonaindia; Xabier Simón Martínez-Goñi; Olaia Liñero; Marta Muñoz-Colmenero; Mikel Aguirre; David Abad; Igor Baroja-Careaga; Alberto de Diego; Jack A Gilbert; Andone Estonba
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.