Literature DB >> 35041070

Distinct Phyllosphere Microbiome of Wild Tomato Species in Central Peru upon Dysbiosis.

Paul Runge1,2, Eric Kemen1, Freddy Ventura3, Remco Stam4.   

Abstract

Plants are colonized by myriads of microbes across kingdoms, which affect host development, fitness, and reproduction. Hence, plant microbiomes have been explored across a broad range of host species, including model organisms, crops, and trees under controlled and natural conditions. Tomato is one of the world's most important vegetable crops; however, little is known about the microbiota of wild tomato species. To obtain insights into the tomato microbiota occurring in natural environments, we sampled epiphytic microbes from leaves of four tomato species, Solanum habrochaites, S. corneliomulleri, S. peruvianum, and S. pimpinellifolium, from two geographical locations within the Lima region of Peru over 2 consecutive years. Here, a high-throughput sequencing approach was applied to investigate microbial compositions including bacteria, fungi, and eukaryotes across tomato species and geographical locations. The phyllosphere microbiome composition varies between hosts and location. Yet, we identified persistent microbes across tomato species that form the tomato microbial core community. In addition, we phenotypically defined healthy and dysbiotic samples and performed a downstream analysis to reveal the impact on microbial community structures. To do so, we compared microbial diversities, unique OTUs, relative abundances of core taxa, and microbial hub taxa, as well as co-occurrence network characteristics in healthy and dysbiotic tomato leaves and found that dysbiosis affects the phyllosphere microbial composition in a host species-dependent manner. Yet, overall, the present data suggests an enrichment of plant-promoting microbial taxa in healthy leaves, whereas numerous microbial taxa containing plant pathogens occurred in dysbiotic leaves.Concluding, we identify the core phyllosphere microbiome of wild tomato species, and show that the overall phyllosphere microbiome can be impacted by sampling time point, geographical location, host genotype, and plant health. Future studies in these components will help understand the microbial contribution to plant health in natural systems and can be of use in cultivated tomatoes.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysbiosis; Microbial colonization; Microbiome; Phyllosphere; Tomatoes

Year:  2022        PMID: 35041070     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01947-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  50 in total

1.  Plant defense stimulation by natural isolates of bacillus depends on efficient surfactin production.

Authors:  Hélène Cawoy; Martin Mariutto; Guillaume Henry; Christophe Fisher; Natallia Vasilyeva; Philippe Thonart; Jacques Dommes; Marc Ongena
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Interspecific reproductive barriers between sympatric populations of wild tomato species (Solanum section Lycopersicon).

Authors:  You Soon Baek; Suzanne M Royer; Amanda K Broz; Paul A Covey; Gloria López-Casado; Reynaldo Nuñez; Philip J Kear; Merideth Bonierbale; Matilde Orillo; Esther van der Knaap; Stephen M Stack; Bruce McClure; Roger T Chetelat; Patricia A Bedinger
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) hosts robust phyllosphere and rhizosphere bacterial communities when grown in soil amended with various organic and synthetic fertilizers.

Authors:  Sarah M Allard; Christopher S Walsh; Anna E Wallis; Andrea R Ottesen; Eric W Brown; Shirley A Micallef
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Environmental Factors and Host Microbiomes Shape Host-Pathogen Dynamics.

Authors:  Adriana P Bernardo-Cravo; Dirk S Schmeller; Antonis Chatzinotas; Vance T Vredenburg; Adeline Loyau
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2020-05-10

5.  [Modifications of systemic fibrinolytic potential during hemodialysis].

Authors:  C Canavese; P Stratta; M Dogliani; A Pacitti; M Racca; R Oneglio; A Vercellone
Journal:  Minerva Nefrol       Date:  1980 Jul-Sep

6.  Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity.

Authors:  Gabriel Castrillo; Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira; Sur Herrera Paredes; Theresa F Law; Laura de Lorenzo; Meghan E Feltcher; Omri M Finkel; Natalie W Breakfield; Piotr Mieczkowski; Corbin D Jones; Javier Paz-Ares; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk.

Authors:  Matthias L Berens; Katarzyna W Wolinska; Stijn Spaepen; Jörg Ziegler; Tatsuya Nobori; Aswin Nair; Verena Krüler; Thomas M Winkelmüller; Yiming Wang; Akira Mine; Dieter Becker; Ruben Garrido-Oter; Paul Schulze-Lefert; Kenichi Tsuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterizing both bacteria and fungi improves understanding of the Arabidopsis root microbiome.

Authors:  Joy Bergelson; Jana Mittelstrass; Matthew W Horton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere.

Authors:  Charlotte I Carlström; Christopher M Field; Miriam Bortfeld-Miller; Barbara Müller; Shinichi Sunagawa; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots.

Authors:  Samiran Banerjee; Florian Walder; Lucie Büchi; Marcel Meyer; Alain Y Held; Andreas Gattinger; Thomas Keller; Raphael Charles; Marcel G A van der Heijden
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  1 in total

1.  Host Plant Species Influences the Composition of Milkweed and Monarch Microbiomes.

Authors:  Thorsten E Hansen; Laramy S Enders
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.