| Literature DB >> 27579012 |
Ana Rita Gaia Machado1, Maria Francisca Simas Teixeira2, Larissa de Souza Kirsch2, Maria da Conceição Loureiro Campelo3, Ila Maria de Aguiar Oliveira1.
Abstract
This paper examined the growth and yield performance of Lentinus citrinus on cupuaçu exocarp (Theobroma grandiflorum) mixed with litter (CE + LI) or rice bran (Oryza sativa) (CE + RB) in the ratio of 2:1 (800 g:200 g) to investigate the nutritional composition and proteolytic potential of the fruiting body produced. Significance values of yield were determined on substrate combinations. In CE + LI the biological efficiency of the mushrooms was 93.5% and the content of fat (4.5%), fiber (11.0%), protein (27.0%) and amino acids were higher when compared with CE + RB. Among the amino acids, the amount of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, alanine, arginine and leucine was high. The biological efficiency on CE + RB reduced to 84.2% and based on the nutritional value, carbohydrates (53.59%), energy (324.33 kcal) and minerals such as zinc, iron, copper, potassium and phosphorus were higher in this substrate combination. Protease activity from fruiting body was significant in CE + LI (463.55 U/mL). This protease showed an optimal activity at 50 °C in neutral and alkaline pH with maximum stability at 30 °C at alkaline pH. This is the first report of L. citrinus fruiting body nutritional composition with potential for human food and application in industrial processes.Entities:
Keywords: Basidiomata; Edible mushroom; Nutritional value; Proteases; Solid state fermentation
Year: 2015 PMID: 27579012 PMCID: PMC4992099 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Characteristics and total yield of Lentinus citrinus.
| Variables | Substrates | |
|---|---|---|
| CE + RB | CE + Li | |
| (95 ± 2.5)a | (120 ± 2.8)a | |
| weight/g | (98 ± 38)a | (116 ± 54)a |
| Biological efficiency/% | (84.2 ± 2.2)a | (93.5 ± 3.1)a |
| Productivity/% | (20.52 ± 1.9)a | (24.17 ± 2.1)a |
| Production rate/% | (20.32 ± 8)b | (34.15 ± 14)a |
| Pileus thickness/cm | (3.7 ± 0.8)ª | (2.4 ± 0.8)b |
| Pileus width/cm | (3.8 ± 0.4)ª | (2.5 ± 0.6)b |
| Stipe length/cm | (3.50 ± 0.3)a | (2.8 ± 0.4)b |
Means followed by the same letters did not differ from one another by the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Centesimal composition of L. citrinus (g/100 g of substrate in dry basis).
| Variables | Substrates | |
|---|---|---|
| CE + RB | CE + Li | |
| Humidity | (11.88 ± 0.4)ª | (10.94 ± 0.1)b |
| Ash | (4.90 ± 0.7)ª | (4.95 ± 0.4)ª |
| Fat | (3.33 ± 0.3)b | (4.50 ± 0.1)ª |
| Nitrogen | (4.67 ± 0.1)b | (6.30 ± 0.2)ª |
| Protein/Nx 4,38 | (20.00 ± 0.2)b | (27.00 ± 0.3)ª |
| Total fiber | (6.30 ± 0.4)b | (11.20 ± 0.2)ª |
| Total carbohydrates | (53.59 ± 0.1)ª | (41.41 ± 0.1)b |
| E/kcal | (324.33 ± 0.1)ª | (314.14 ± 0.1)b |
Means followed by the same letters did not differ from one another by the Tukey test (p < 0.05).
Biomass minerals of L. citrinus cultivated in different substrates.
| Nutrients | Substrates | |
|---|---|---|
| CE + RB | CE + Li | |
| P (g kg−1) | (10.94 ± 0.01)a | (0.01 ± 0.01)b |
| K (g kg−1) | (22.25 ± 0.02)a | (0.96 ± 0.03)b |
| Ca (g kg−1) | (0.09 ± 0.01)b | (40.00 ± 0.02)a |
| Mg (g kg−1) | (1.26 ± 0.04)a | (0.58 ± 0.01)b |
| Fe (mg kg−1) | (53.34 ± 0.02)a | (0.57 ± 0.03)b |
| Na (mg kg−1) | (174.42 ± 0.02)b | (446.0 ± 0.52)a |
| Cu (mg kg−1) | (34.84 ± 0.01)a | (0.27 ± 0.02)b |
| Mn (mg kg−1) | (9.05 ± 0.02)a | ND |
| Zn (mg kg−1) | (66.21 ± 0.02)a | (0.10 ± 0.01)b |
Means followed by the same letters did not differ from one another by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). ND: no determined.
Amino acids presented in the biomass of Lentinus citrinus cultivated in different substrates (mg/100/g protein).
| Amino acids | CE + RB | CE + Li |
|---|---|---|
| Aspartic acid | (2.49 ± 0.01)b | (2.57 ± 0.02)a |
| Glutamic acid | (4.00 ± 0.01)b | (4.41 ± 0.03)a |
| Serine | (1.83 ± 0.03)a | (1.52 ± 0.01)b |
| Glycine | (1.24 ± 0.01)b | (1.45 ± 0.02)a |
| Histidine | (0.49 ± 0.03)b | (0.70 ± 0.03)a |
| Arginine | (1.47 ± 0.02)b | (2.28 ± 0.02)a |
| Threonine | (0.96 ± 0.01)b | (1.30 ± 0.01)a |
| Alanine | (1.11 ± 0.02)b | (1.78 ± 0.01)a |
| Proline | (0.49 ± 0.01)b | (1.24 ± 0.03)a |
| Tyrosine | (0.46 ± 0.03)b | (1.10 ± 0.02)a |
| Valine | (1.25 ± 0.01)b | (1.55 ± 0.01)a |
| Methionine | (0.18 ± 0.03)b | (0.48 ± 0.03)a |
| Cysteine | (0.04 ± 0.02)b | (0.15 ± 0.01)a |
| Isoleucine | (0.65 ± 0.01)b | (1.27 ± 0.02)a |
| Leucine | (0.93 ± 0.01)b | (2.07 ± 0.02)a |
| Phenylalanine | (0.77 ± 0.01)b | (1.28 ± 0.01)a |
| Lysine | (1.33 ± 0.02)b | (1.85 ± 0.01)a |
| Tryptophan | (0.41 ± 0.03)b | (0.37 ± 0.01)a |
| Total | 2010 | 2700 |
Means followed by the same letters did not differ from one another by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Effect of pH (A) and temperature (B) on proteolytic activity of Lentinus citrinus proteases.
Figure 2Effect of pH (A) and temperature (B) on stability of Lentinus citrinus proteases.