Literature DB >> 27578690

A Simulation Platform for Quantifying Survival Bias: An Application to Research on Determinants of Cognitive Decline.

Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, Melinda C Power, Jennifer Weuve, Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda, Jessica R Marden, Eric Vittinghoff, Niels Keiding, M Maria Glymour.   

Abstract

Bias due to selective mortality is a potential concern in many studies and is especially relevant in cognitive aging research because cognitive impairment strongly predicts subsequent mortality. Biased estimation of the effect of an exposure on rate of cognitive decline can occur when mortality is a common effect of exposure and an unmeasured determinant of cognitive decline and in similar settings. This potential is often represented as collider-stratification bias in directed acyclic graphs, but it is difficult to anticipate the magnitude of bias. In this paper, we present a flexible simulation platform with which to quantify the expected bias in longitudinal studies of determinants of cognitive decline. We evaluated potential survival bias in naive analyses under several selective survival scenarios, assuming that exposure had no effect on cognitive decline for anyone in the population. Compared with the situation with no collider bias, the magnitude of bias was higher when exposure and an unmeasured determinant of cognitive decline interacted on the hazard ratio scale to influence mortality or when both exposure and rate of cognitive decline influenced mortality. Bias was, as expected, larger in high-mortality situations. This simulation platform provides a flexible tool for evaluating biases in studies with high mortality, as is common in cognitive aging research.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive decline; collider-stratification bias; dementia; selection bias; selective survival; simulation; survival bias; truncation by death

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578690      PMCID: PMC5013884          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  23 in total

1.  Commentary: Weighing up the dead and missing: reflections on inverse-probability weighting and principal stratification to address truncation by death.

Authors:  Basile Chaix; David Evans; Juan Merlo; Etsuji Suzuki
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Longitudinal Data with Follow-up Truncated by Death: Match the Analysis Method to Research Aims.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Laura L Johnson; Brian L Egleston; Paula H Diehr
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.901

Review 3.  Systematic review: factors associated with risk for and possible prevention of cognitive decline in later life.

Authors:  Brenda L Plassman; John W Williams; James R Burke; Tracey Holsinger; Sophiya Benjamin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Commentary: selection bias as an explanation for the obesity paradox: just because it's possible doesn't mean it's plausible.

Authors:  M Maria Glymour; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Wei Liu; M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Xiaojuan Mi; Soko Setoguchi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Statins, cognition, and dementia—systematic review and methodological commentary.

Authors:  Melinda C Power; Jennifer Weuve; A Richey Sharrett; Deborah Blacker; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  The effect of maintaining cognition on risk of disability and death.

Authors:  Kristine Yaffe; Karla Lindquist; Eric Vittinghoff; Deborah Barnes; Eleanor M Simonsick; Anne Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Caterina Rosano; Susan M Rubin; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Tamara Harris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Semicompeting risks in aging research: methods, issues and needs.

Authors:  Ravi Varadhan; Qian-Li Xue; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Cécile Proust-Lima; Melinda C Power; Alden L Gross; Scott M Hofer; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Geneviève Chêne; M Maria Glymour; Carole Dufouil
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  Type 2 diabetes and 10-year risk of dementia and cognitive impairment among older Mexican Americans.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Mayeda; Mary N Haan; Alka M Kanaya; Kristine Yaffe; John Neuhaus
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  31 in total

1.  Can Survival Bias Explain the Age Attenuation of Racial Inequalities in Stroke Incidence?: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Hailey R Banack; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; Jessica R Marden; Rachel A Whitmer; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Does selective survival before study enrolment attenuate estimated effects of education on rate of cognitive decline in older adults? A simulation approach for quantifying survival bias in life course epidemiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; Teresa J Filshtein; Yorghos Tripodis; M Maria Glymour; Alden L Gross
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  The Obesity Paradox in Survival after Cancer Diagnosis: Tools for Evaluation of Potential Bias.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Education and Cognitive Aging: Accounting for Selection and Confounding in Linkage of Data From the Danish Registry and Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.

Authors:  Else Foverskov; M Maria Glymour; Erik L Mortensen; Anders Holm; Theis Lange; Rikke Lund
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Association of midlife lipids with 20-year cognitive change: A cohort study.

Authors:  Melinda C Power; Andreea Rawlings; A Richey Sharrett; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Josef Coresh; Christie M Ballantyne; Yashashwi Pokharel; Erin D Michos; Alan Penman; Alvaro Alonso; David Knopman; Thomas H Mosley; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Vitamin D status, cognitive decline and incident dementia: the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

Authors:  Caroline S Duchaine; Denis Talbot; Mohamed Nafti; Yves Giguère; Sylvie Dodin; André Tourigny; Pierre-Hugues Carmichael; Danielle Laurin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-03

8.  Causal inference in studies of preterm babies: a simulation study.

Authors:  J M Snowden; O Basso
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Vascular cognitive impairment and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Lucette A Cysique; Bruce J Brew
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.643

10.  An Investigation of Selection Bias in Estimating Racial Disparity in Stroke Risk Factors.

Authors:  D Leann Long; George Howard; Dustin M Long; Suzanne Judd; Jennifer J Manly; Leslie A McClure; Virginia G Wadley; Monika M Safford; Ronit Katz; M Maria Glymour
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.