Literature DB >> 27577726

Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

S Takahashi1, M Hoshino2, K Takayama3, K Iseki4, R Sasaoka5, T Tsujio6, H Yasuda7, T Sasaki8, F Kanematsu9, H Kono10, H Toyoda2, H Nakamura2.   

Abstract

This study revealed the time course of osteoporotic vertebral fracture by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification. Signal changes were associated with the compression degree and mobility of the fractured vertebral body. This classification showed sufficient reliability in categorizing magnetic resonance imaging findings of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). This study investigated the time course of OVFs by MRI using a simple classification.
METHODS: This multicenter cohort study was performed from 2012 to 2015. Consecutive patients with ≤2-week-old OVFs were enrolled in 11 institutions. MRI was performed at enrollment and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Signal changes on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI, and short τ inversion recovery (STIR) were classified according to signal intensity. Height and angular motion of vertebral bodies were also measured.
RESULTS: The 6-month follow-up was completed by 153 patients. At enrollment, fractured vertebrae signal changes were 43 % diffuse and 57 % confined low on T1WI; on T2WI, 56, 24, and 5 % were confined low, high, and diffuse low, respectively; on STIR, 100 % were high. On T1WI, diffuse low remained most common (90 % at 1 month and 60 % at 3 months) until 6 and 12 months, when most were confined low (54 and 52 %, respectively). On T2WI, confined low remained most common (decreasing to 41 % at 12 months). On STIR, high signal change was shown in 98, 87, and 64 % at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 3, 6, and 12 months, diffuse low signal change was associated with significantly lower vertebral height, and high signal change was associated with significantly greater angular motion.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI signal changes were associated with the compression degree and angular motion of fractured vertebrae. This classification showed sufficient reliability in categorizing MRI findings of OVFs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoporotic vertebral fractures; Simple classification; Time course

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27577726     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3737-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Lee F Rogers; Pierre D Delmas; Harry K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Occult intraosseous fracture: detection with MR imaging.

Authors:  L Yao; J K Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Bone marrow imaging.

Authors:  J B Vogler; W A Murphy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Tomoaki Toyone; Tomoaki Toyone; Tadashi Tanaka; Yuichi Wada; Koya Kamikawa; Masaaki Ito; Kenji Kimura; Takeshi Yamasita; Satoshi Matsushita; Ryutaro Shiboi; Daisuke Kato; Ryutaku Kaneyama; Makoto Otsuka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Kado; W S Browner; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-06-14

6.  MRI findings of thoracolumbar spine fractures: a categorisation based on MRI examinations of 100 fractures.

Authors:  F C Oner; A P van Gils; W J Dhert; A J Verbout
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.

Authors:  Mohammed F Shamji; Darren M Roffey; Darryl K Young; Rudy Reindl; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-10

8.  Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI.

Authors:  F C Oner; L M P Ramos; R K J Simmermacher; P T D Kingma; C H Diekerhof; W J A Dhert; A J Verbout
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Weight-bearing radiographs in thoracolumbar fractures: do they influence management?

Authors:  J S Mehta; M R Reed; J L McVie; P L Sanderson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  A Slavici; M Rauschmann; C Fleege
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Vertebral bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging correlates with bone healing histomorphometry in (sub)acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Haoran Qi; Yefeng Zhang; Junning Wang; Jingcai Xue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Traumatic vertebra and endplate fractures promote adjacent disc degeneration: evidence from a clinical MR follow-up study.

Authors:  Xuan Lu; Zhiwei Zhu; Jianjiang Pan; Zhiyun Feng; Xiaoqiang Lv; Michele C Battié; Yue Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Machine-learning-based approach for nonunion prediction following osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Shinji Takahashi; Hidetomi Terai; Masatoshi Hoshino; Tadao Tsujio; Minori Kato; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Akinobu Suzuki; Koji Tamai; Akito Yabu; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  Percutaneous cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Maroun Rizkallah; Falah Bachour; Firas Atallah; Pierre Emmanuel Moreau; Ghassan Maalouf
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

6.  Classification of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Thomas R Blattert; Patrick Hahn; Alexander Franck; Frank Hartmann; Bernhard Ullrich; Akhil Verheyden; Sven Mörk; Volker Zimmermann; Oliver Gonschorek; Michael Müller; Sebastian Katscher; Andre El Saman; Gholam Pajenda; Robert Morrison; Christian Schinkel; Stefan Piltz; Axel Partenheimer; Christian W Müller; Erol Gercek; Michael Scherer; Nabila Bouzraki; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07

7.  Impact of paravertebral muscle in thoracolumbar and lower lumbar regions on outcomes following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Hasibullah Habibi; Shinji Takahashi; Masatoshi Hoshino; Kazushi Takayama; Ryuichi Sasaoka; Tadao Tsujio; Hiroyuki Yasuda; Fumiaki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Shoichiro Ohyama; Yusuke Hori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Five-year follow up results of posterior decompression and fixation surgery for delayed neural disorder associated with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Taketoshi Yasuda; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Kayo Suzuki; Masato Nakano; Shoji Seki; Kenta Watabnabe; Masahiko Kanamori; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Vertebral mobility is a valuable indicator for predicting and determining bone union in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a conventional observation study.

Authors:  Kozo Sato; Yuichiro Yamada; Masakazu Kogawa; Takuya Sekiguchi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.