Literature DB >> 15129074

Weight-bearing radiographs in thoracolumbar fractures: do they influence management?

J S Mehta1, M R Reed, J L McVie, P L Sanderson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare supine and erect (weight-bearing) radiographs in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without a neurologic deficit and to determine whether the erect radiographs alter the deformity and the management plan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar fracture without a neurologic deficit is safe and effective. There are some guidelines in the literature that provide objective standards to identify the patients that are suitable for nonoperative treatment. These guidelines are based on measurements on supine radiographs. The role of weight-bearing radiographs in influencing the management plan of these injuries has not been explored.
METHODS: Fractures between T11 and L2 in 28 patients were considered suitable for nonoperative treatment initially. Radiographic measurements included anterior and posterior vertebral body heights, interpedicular distance, and the Cobb angle on the supine and erect radiographs. A change in the treatment from the initial nonoperative management plan, based on the radiographic findings, was recorded.
RESULTS: Mean supine Cobb angle of 11 degrees increased to 18 degrees on weight-bearing films. The mean anterior vertebral compression increased from 34% to 46%. No change was noted between the posterior vertebral heights and the interpedicular distance. Seven of the 28 patients were subjected to surgical stabilization based on these findings.
CONCLUSION: Performing erect radiographs in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without a neurologic deficit provides additional information and did alter the management plan in a significant proportion (25%) of our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129074     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113873.07484.5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Efficacy of the dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Niimi; T Kono; A Nishihara; M Hasegawa; A Matsumine; T Kono; A Sudo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by "in situ contouring".

Authors:  Jean-Paul Steib; Mourad Aoui; Anca Mitulescu; Ioan Bogorin; Xavier Chiffolot; Jean-Michel Cognet; Patrick Simon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Conservative Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Ulrich J Spiegl; Klaus Fischer; Jörg Schmidt; Jörg Schnoor; Stefan Delank; Christoph Josten; Tobias Schulte; Christoph-Eckhardt Heyde
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Urinary Pentosidine levels negatively associates with trabecular bone scores in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Y J Choi; S Y Ock; Y Jin; J S Lee; S H Kim; Y -S Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Acute traumatic intraosseous fluid sign predisposes to dynamic fracture mobility.

Authors:  Troy A Hutchins; Richard H Wiggins; Jill M Stein; Lubdha M Shah
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-11-10

6.  The importance of morphometric radiographic vertebral assessment for the detection of patients who need pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal diabetic Korean women.

Authors:  Y J Choi; S-O Yang; C S Shin; Y-S Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  U J Spiegl; C Josten; B M Devitt; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Difference in the Cobb Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  In-Suk Bae; Byung Gwan Moon; Hee In Kang; Jae Hoon Kim; Cheolsu Jwa; Deok Ryeong Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-17

9.  Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Takahashi; M Hoshino; K Takayama; K Iseki; R Sasaoka; T Tsujio; H Yasuda; T Sasaki; F Kanematsu; H Kono; H Toyoda; H Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Reliability of the evaluation of posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar spine trauma with the use of computed tomography scan.

Authors:  Alecio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos; Andrei Fernandes Joaquim; Ricardo Vieira Botelho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.