Literature DB >> 27576182

Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.

Elisabeth Waldmann1, Irina Gessl1, Daniela Sallinger1, Philip Jeschek1, Martha Britto-Arias1, Georg Heinze2, Elisabeth Fasching3, Werner Weiss4, Michael Gschwantler4, Michael Trauner1, Monika Ferlitsch1.   

Abstract

Background and study aim: Screening colonoscopy only effectively prevents colorectal cancer if performed with high quality. The aim of this study was to analyze the detection rates of premalignant colorectal lesions in screening colonoscopies performed within a nationwide quality control program for screening colonoscopy in Austria.
Methods: Data from electronic records of the screening program from its implementation in 2007 until December 2014 were analyzed in order to calculate detection rates for adenomas, advanced adenomas, polyps, and proximal lesions, and rates of cecal intubation, sedation, complications, and adequate bowel preparation. Results were evaluated to identify trends and changes in quality parameters over the 8-year study period.
Results: During the study period, 301 endoscopists provided data from 159 246 screening colonoscopies. Mean age of screened individuals was 61.1 years, and 49.1 % were women. Significant increases over time were found for age- and sex-adjusted adenoma detection rates (ADRs), which increased from a mean of 22.2 % (SD 10.7 %) in 2007/2008 to 24.2 % (SD 11.6 %) in 2013/2014. On average, each endoscopist increased their individual ADR by + 1.5 percentage points per 2-year period (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.9 - 2.2 percentage points; P < 0.01). Similarly, detection rates for proximal lesions rose from 15.8 % (SD 9.8 %) to 21.7 % (SD 13.3 %  + 2.5 percentage points per 2-year period, 95 %CI 1.9 - 3.1 percentage points; P < 0.01). ADR in men increased from 27.6 % in 2007/2008 (SD 11.1 %) to 29.2 % in 2013/2014 (SD 12.7 %; P < 0.01); ADR in women increased from 14.2 % (SD 7.1 %) in 2007/2008 to 19.0 % (SD 10.5 %) in 2013/2014 (P < 0.01). Advanced adenoma detection rates decreased during the study period, from 11.4 % (SD 9.0 %) in 2007/2008 to 7.6 % (SD 5.4 %) in 2013/2014 (P = 0.06) in men, and from 5.5 % (SD 5.3 %) in 2007/2008 to 4.0 % (SD 4.1 %) in 2013/2014 in women (P = 0.21). Conclusions: This study showed an improvement in the quality of screening colonoscopies performed within a quality assurance program in Austria between 2007 and 2014. Although, overall ADR increased significantly during the study period, there was a decrease in the rate of advanced adenoma detection. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576182     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  4 in total

1.  Impact of high-volume, intermediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonoscopy quality and patient satisfaction: An observational study.

Authors:  E Waldmann; D Penz; B Majcher; J Zagata; H Šinkovec; G Heinze; A Dokladanska; A Szymanska; M Trauner; A Ferlitsch; M Ferlitsch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Roel M M Bogie; Chantal M C le Clercq; Quirinus J M Voorham; Martijn Cordes; Daoud Sie; Christian Rausch; Evert van den Broek; Sara D J de Vries; Nicole C T van Grieken; Robert G Riedl; Prapto Sastrowijoto; Ernst-Jan Speel; Rein Vos; Bjorn Winkens; Manon van Engeland; Bauke Ylstra; Gerrit A Meijer; Ad A M Masclee; Beatriz Carvalho
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter; Miguel Areia; Dirk Domagk; Michel F Kaminski; Andrew Veitch; Wafaa Khanoussi; Ian M Gralnek; Cesare Hassan; Helmut Messmann; Thierry Ponchon; Paul Fockens; Axel Dignass; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  New risk stratification after colorectal polypectomy reduces burden of surveillance without increasing mortality.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Andreas Kammerlander; Irina Gessl; Daniela Penz; Barbara Majcher; Anna Hinterberger; Michael Trauner; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.