Literature DB >> 27574803

Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent.

Sherri A Mason1, Danielle Garneau2, Rebecca Sutton3, Yvonne Chu2, Karyn Ehmann2, Jason Barnes2, Parker Fink4, Daniel Papazissimos4, Darrin L Rogers5.   

Abstract

Municipal wastewater effluent has been proposed as one pathway for microplastics to enter the aquatic environment. Here we present a broad study of municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent as a pathway for microplastic pollution to enter receiving waters. A total of 90 samples were analyzed from 17 different facilities across the United States. Averaging all facilities and sampling dates, 0.05 ± 0.024 microparticles were found per liter of effluent. Though a small value on a per liter basis, even minor municipal wastewater treatment facilities process millions of liters of wastewater each day, yielding daily discharges that ranged from ∼50,000 up to nearly 15 million particles. Averaging across the 17 facilities tested, our results indicate that wastewater treatment facilities are releasing over 4 million microparticles per facility per day. Fibers and fragments were found to be the most common type of particle within the effluent; however, some fibers may be derived from non-plastic sources. Considerable inter- and intra-facility variation in discharge concentrations, as well as the relative proportions of particle types, was observed. Statistical analysis suggested facilities serving larger populations discharged more particles. Results did not suggest tertiary filtration treatments were an effective means of reducing discharge. Assuming that fragments and pellets found in the effluent arise from the 'microbeads' found in many cosmetics and personal care products, it is estimated that between 3 and 23 billion (with an average of 13 billion) of these microplastic particles are being released into US waterways every day via municipal wastewater. This estimate can be used to evaluate the contribution of microbeads to microplastic pollution relative to other sources (e.g., plastic litter and debris) and pathways (e.g., stormwater) of discharge. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Microbeads; Microfibers; Personal care products; Plastic pollution; Synthetic materials; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27574803     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  33 in total

1.  The occurrence of microplastic contamination in littoral sediments of the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Abolfazl Naji; Zinat Esmaili; Sherri A Mason; A Dick Vethaak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Occurrence, sources, human health impacts and mitigation of microplastic pollution.

Authors:  Samaneh Karbalaei; Parichehr Hanachi; Tony R Walker; Matthew Cole
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Up and away: ontogenic transference as a pathway for aerial dispersal of microplastics.

Authors:  Rana Al-Jaibachi; Ross N Cuthbert; Amanda Callaghan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  Variation in the presence and abundance of anthropogenic microfibers in the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN, USA.

Authors:  Lina Said; Matthew J Heard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Nile red staining in microplastic analysis-proposal for a reliable and fast identification approach for large microplastics.

Authors:  Elena Hengstmann; Elke Kerstin Fischer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 7.  Plastics in municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment plant effluents: challenges and opportunities for South Africa-a review.

Authors:  Austine O C Iroegbu; Rotimi E Sadiku; Suprakas S Ray; Yskandar Hamam
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Assessing the sorption of pharmaceuticals to microplastics through in-situ experiments in New York City waterways.

Authors:  Debra L Magadini; Joaquim I Goes; Sarah Ortiz; John Lipscomb; Masha Pitiranggon; Beizhan Yan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Turkey: a comparison of the influent and secondary effluent concentrations.

Authors:  Sedat Gündoğdu; Cem Çevik; Evşen Güzel; Serdar Kilercioğlu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Anderson Abel de Souza Machado; Werner Kloas; Christiane Zarfl; Stefan Hempel; Matthias C Rillig
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.