| Literature DB >> 27573440 |
Hui Sun1,2, Minna Santalahti2, Jukka Pumpanen3, Kajar Köster4,5, Frank Berninger4, Tommaso Raffaello4, Fred O Asiegbu4, Jussi Heinonsalo2.
Abstract
Soil microbial responses to fire are likely to change over the course of forest recovery. Investigations on long-term changes in bacterial dynamics following fire are rare. We characterized the soil bacterial communities across three different times post fire in a 2 to 152-year fire chronosequence by Illumina MiSeq sequencing, coupled with a functional gene array (GeoChip). The results showed that the bacterial diversity did not differ between the recently and older burned areas, suggesting a concomitant recovery in the bacterial diversity after fire. The differences in bacterial communities over time were mainly driven by the rare operational taxonomic units (OTUs < 0.1%). Proteobacteria (39%), Acidobacteria (34%) and Actinobacteria (17%) were the most abundant phyla across all sites. Genes involved in C and N cycling pathways were present in all sites showing high redundancy in the gene profiles. However, hierarchical cluster analysis using gene signal intensity revealed that the sites with different fire histories formed separate clusters, suggesting potential differences in maintaining essential biogeochemical soil processes. Soil temperature, pH and water contents were the most important factors in shaping the bacterial community structures and function. This study provides functional insight on the impact of fire disturbance on soil bacterial community.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27573440 PMCID: PMC5004109 DOI: 10.1038/srep32411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Bacterial richness and diversity index for 16S region libraries in the soil from each site after fire.
| Years after fire | No. of Sequences | OTUs coverage (%) | Normalization | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed OTUs | Estimated OTUs | Shannon | Shannon evenness | |||
| 2 | 39762 ± 3799 | 0.98 | 1641 ± 34c | 2369 ± 54c | 5.2 ± 0.2c | 0.69 ± 0.03c |
| 60 | 32269 ± 1974 | 0.98 | 1524 ± 124d | 2027 ± 138d | 5.3 ± 0.1c | 0.72 ± 0.01c |
| 152 | 32069 ± 4704 | 0.99 | 1195 ± 112e | 1728 ± 153e | 4.8 ± 0.2c | 0.67 ± 0.01c |
aAverage number of sequence obtained from the three replicates in each site with standard deviation.
bData were calculated at 3% genetic distance level with standard deviation based on the same number of sequences from each replicate (27699/sample) in Mothur. OTUs containing singleton sequence were discarded.
Different letters (c, d and e) in each column represent significant difference level at 0.05 between each site.
Figure 1Venn diagram showing the unique and shared OTUs from MiSeq sequencing (a), and presence/absence of functional genes identified by GeoChip (b) between the three burned sites. A total of 3 692 OTUs and 748 genes were detected across the three sites, respectively. Abbreviation: 2y: 2-year after fire; 60y: 60-year after fire; 152y: 152-year after fire.
Figure 2Principle Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot (environmental variables as vectors) showing differences in bacterial community structure (a) and gene structure (b) with time since fire.
Figure 3Bar chart showing the phylum-level assignment for operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from three sites differing in fire histories as the relative proportions of OTUs and sequence reads.
The description of fire age characteristics and soil properties of the study sitesa.
| Age | Replicate | Soil textural classification | Tree species composition (%) | Age of the trees | Year of last fire | Trees/ha | Soil pH (humus layer) | Soil temperature (growing season) (°C) | Soil gravimetric water content (%) | SoilN (g m−2) | SoilC (C g m−2) | TRootBiom (kg m−2) | Ergosterol (μg g−1SOM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2y | 1 | Loamy sand | 92 Pi, 8 Bi | 35/ | 2009 | 1550 | 4.0 (±0.08) | 11.3 (±0.0) | 34 (±3.2) | 53.988 (±14.87) | 1364.730 (±377.59) | 0.340 (±0.00) | 219.821 (±13.78) |
| 2 | Loamy sand | 95 Pi, 5 Bi | 21/ | 2009 | 900 | 4.1 (±0.10) | 11.6 (±0.0) | 37 (±2.2) | 38.791 (±3.56) | 1596.566 (±93.29) | 0.301 (±0.007) | 217.972 (±7.24) | |
| 3 | Loamy sand | 96 Pi, 5 Bi | 25/4 | 2009 | 950 | 4.1 ( (±0.10) | 11.3 (±0.0) | 34 (±2.0) | 40.857 (±11.98) | 1531.788 (±104.87) | 0.223 (±0.00) | 222.433 (±2.36) | |
| 60y | 1 | Loamy sand | 95 Pi, 5 Bi | 43/ | 1951 | 625 | 3.8 (±0.21) | 10.8 (±0.0) | 49 (±4.9) | 61.635 (±20.05) | 2227.050 (±286.91) | 0.236 (±0.00) | 279.935 (±28.88) |
| 2 | Loamy sand | 99 Pi, 1 Bi | 43/ | 1951 | 1150 | 3.8 (±0.13) | 10.6 (±0.0) | 50 (±6.4) | 70.751 (±27.83) | 2518.135 (±99.71) | 0.260 (±0.04) | 265.077 (±31.20) | |
| 3 | Loamy sand | 97 Pi, 2 Bi | 43/ | 1951 | 710 | 3.8 (±0.15) | 10.8 (±0.0) | 51 (±5.4) | 78.475 (±9.82) | 2092.943 (±294.64) | 0.307 (±0.00) | 255.367 (±6.55) | |
| 152y | 1 | Loamy sand | 96 Pi, 4 Bi | 104/ | 1859 | 200 | 3.7 (±0.17) | 10.4 (±0.0) | 57 (±4.2) | 53.299 (±4.31) | 2252.368 (±42.69) | 0.292 (±0.00) | 268.976 (±18.47) |
| 2 | Loamy sand | 98Pi, 2 Bi | 84/ | 1859 | 225 | 3.8 (±0.11) | 10.5 (±0.0) | 56 (±4.9) | 63.466 (±8.57) | 2670.151 (±66.80) | 0.318 (±0.05) | 276.662 (±13.86) | |
| 3 | Loamy sand | 98Pi, 2 Bi | 90/145/310 | 1859 | 211 | 3.7 (±0.14) | 10.4 (±0.0) | 57 (±4.5) | 62.396 (±3.57) | 2590.029 (±28.43) | 0.371 (±0.00) | 304.662 (±25.49) |
aAll the data were derived from Köster et al.33.
bRepresenting the age of youngest living tree/average age of the stand/oldest living tree on the study site. Pi — Scots pine, Bi — Birch.
Standard errors of the means are in parentheses (n = 3).
Number of gene probes detected in each gene category from the sites with different fire histories.
| Gene category | No. of gene probe detected (mean ± SD) | No. of gene probe in each category | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-year after fire | 60-year after frie | 152-year after fire | ||
| Carbon Cycling | 7710 ± 53b | 6986 ± 346c | 7439 ± 90bc | 9443 |
| Electron transfer | 302 ± 6b | 267 ± 12c | 289 ± 4bc | 382 |
| Metal Homeostasis | 14093 ± 125b | 12653 ± 771c | 13385 ± 147bc | 17208 |
| Nitrogen | 2109 ± 9b | 1895 ± 99c | 2039 ± 26bc | 2592 |
| Organic Remediation | 4601 ± 42b | 4200 ± 199c | 4467 ± 21bc | 5571 |
| Phosphorus | 1168 ± 7b | 1085 ± 58c | 1121 ± 8bc | 1430 |
| Secondary metabolism | 1262 ± 11b | 1170 ± 52c | 1224 ± 15bc | 1479 |
| Stress | 8515 ± 72b | 7703 ± 415c | 8183 ± 119bc | 10439 |
| Sulfur | 1395 ± 13b | 1261 ± 81c | 1348 ± 12bc | 1748 |
| virulence | 7939 ± 95b | 7339 ± 319c | 7627 ± 73bc | 9415 |
| Other | 2488 ± 18b | 2239 ± 141c | 2343 ± 44bc | 3153 |
| Total | 51582 ± 432b | 46800 ± 2487c | 49465 ± 539bc | 62860 |
aThe values represent the mean and standard deviation of three replicates from each age after fire.
Different letters in each gene category represent Tukey’s significant difference at a P value of 0.05 between the sites after fire.
Figure 4Hierarchical cluster analysis of functional gene probes in the three sites differing in fire histories based on the signal intensity of detected probes.
The numbers after the site name represent replicates 1 to 3 at each site.
Figure 5Normalized average signal intensity of genes involved in carbon cycling (a,b), nitrogen cycling (c) and phosphorus cycling (d) showing significant difference between sites. Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The bars represent the standard deviations, and different letters in each panel represent Tukey’s significance at a P value of 0.05.