| Literature DB >> 27572919 |
Tawfik A Saleh1, Mutasem M Al-Shalalfeh1, Abdulaziz A Al-Saadi1.
Abstract
Graphene functionalized with polyamidoamine dendrimer, decorated with silver nanoparticles (G-D-Ag), was synthesized and evaluated as a substrate with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) for methimazole (MTZ) detection. Sodium borohydride was used as a reducing agent to cultivate silver nanoparticles on the dendrimer. The obtained G-D-Ag was characterized by using UV-vis spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM), Fourier-transformed infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopy. The SEM image indicated the successful formation of the G-D-Ag. The behavior of MTZ on the G-D-Ag as a reliable and robust substrate was investigated by SERS, which indicated mostly a chemical interaction between G-D-Ag and MTZ. The bands of the MTZ normal spectra at 1538, 1463, 1342, 1278, 1156, 1092, 1016, 600, 525 and 410 cm(-1) were enhanced due to the SERS effect. Correlations between the logarithmical scale of MTZ concentrations and SERS signal intensities were established, and a low detection limit of 1.43 × 10(-12) M was successfully obtained. The density functional theory (DFT) approach was utilized to provide reliable assignment of the key Raman bands.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27572919 PMCID: PMC5004140 DOI: 10.1038/srep32185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Illustration explaining the synthesis steps of the graphene- polyamidoamine dendrimer-silver G-D-Ag.
Figure 2Mechanism of the stabilization of the AgNPs on the graphene through the dendrimer for the preparation of graphene- polyamidoamine dendrimer-silver (G-D-Ag).
Figure 3The optimized structure of MTZ.
Infrared, Raman, SERS and calculated DFT vibrational frequencies (cm−1) of MTZ.
| Observed | Calculated | Assignments with Corresponding potential energy distributions (PEDs) (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | Raman (Solid) | Raman (Solution) | SERS | MTZ | MTZ-Ag | |
| 3159 w | 3161 w | 3166 m | 3162 | 3166 | 97% ν (C7-H) | |
| 3104 w | 3105 w | 3106 vw | 3142 | 3147 | 98% ν (C6-H) | |
| 3012 w | 3022 | 3021 | 96% ν (C5-H11) | |||
| 2999 | 2995 | 100% ν (C5-H12) | ||||
| 2949 vw | 2950 m | 2960 m | 2945 m | 2936 | 2932 | 96% ν (C5-H13) |
| 1578 vs | 1579 s | 1580 m | 1567 w | 1588 | 1581 | 63% ν (C6 = C7), 10% δ (N3-H) bend |
| 1538 vw | 1522 vs | 1509 | 1496 | 24% ν (N2-C4), 15% ν (C-C), 38% δ (H11-C-H12) bend | ||
| 1473 | 1467 | 23% ν (S-C4), 14% ν (C4-N) bend, 10% δ (N3-H) bend, | ||||
| 1479 vw | 1480 vs | 1466 | 1457 | 72% δ CHMe scissoring | ||
| 1462 s | 1463 vs | 1460 vw | 1452 s | 1459 | 1452 | 23% ν (S-C4), 14% ν (N3-C4), 12% δ (C-H) bend, |
| 1403 m | 1410 m | 1410 vw | 1408 w | 1415 | 1411 | 14% ν (N2-C4), 14% ν (N3-C6), 13% ν (S-C4), 30%δ (C -H) bend |
| 1339 vs | 1342 s | 1345 s | 1359 vs | 1315 | 1328 | 32% ν (N2-C4), 11% δ ring bend, 19% δ C6-N3-H bend |
| 1274 s | 1278 m | 1281 m | 1320 s | 1285 | 1309 | 15% ν (N2-C5), 19% δ N3-H (C6-H) bend, 14% δ ring breathing |
| 1248 m | 1252 vs | 1255 vw | 1277 vw | 1212 | 1237 | 51% ν (N3-C4), 18% δ N3-H (C6-H) bend, 13% δ (C7-H) bend |
| 1152 vs | 1156 vw | 1153 m | 1141 m | 1159 | 1150 | 16% ν (N3-C6), 16% ν (S-C4), 15% δ (H11-C-H12) rock, |
| 1086 vw | 1092 m | 1088 vw | 1090 m | 1089 | 1091 | 46% ν (N3-C6), 14%δ (N3-H) bend, 21% δ (C7-H) bend |
| 1014 s | 1016 m | 1017 vw | 1037 m | 1013 | 1022 | 15% ring CH bend, 13% δ CHMe bend, 41% δ ring bend |
| 913 m | 915 vs | 916 s | 937 w | 913 | 923 | 12% ν (N2-C4), 12% δ N3-H (C6-H) bend, 62% δ ring bend |
| 818 w | 810 vw | 830 vw | 806 | 818 | 89% γ (H-C6-C7-H) twist | |
| 673 vs | 679 vw | 684 vs | 687 w | 685 | 699 | 25% δ (C7-N2-C5) bend, 15% δ (C4-N2-C5) bend |
| 643 vw | 670 vw | 650 | 667 | 47% ring CH bend, 39% γ (N3-C4-N2) | ||
| 599 vw | 600 vw | 602 vw | 619 m | 603 | 623 | 78% γ CN ring bend. |
| 527 vs | 525 m | 522 w | 498 s | 534 | 520 | 53% δ (S-C4-N3) bend, 25% δ (S-C4-N2), |
| 493 vw | 503 | 569 | 84% γ (N3- C6-C7) | |||
| 411 s | 410 s | 410 m | 427 m | 411 | 421 | 71% δ (S-C4-N2) |
| 264 m | 260 m | 279 w | 238 | 251 | 85% γ (C4-S) wag | |
| 208 vw | 209 vw | 207 | 220 | 76% γ ring | ||
Values are in cm−1; ν, stretch; γ, bend; δ, symmetric. vs. very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak.
Figure 4UV-Vis absorption spectra of (a) the G-D and (b) the G-D-Ag.
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of (a) G-D and (b) G-D-Ag.
Figure 6(a) Typical SEM image (inset: TEM image) of G-D; (b) SEM image (inset: TEM image) of G-D-Ag; (c) EDX spectra of G-D; (d) EDX spectra of G-D-Ag; (e) Mapping image of G-D; (f) Mapping image of G-D-Ag; (g) TEM image of G-D-Ag.
Figure 7Raman spectra of (a) G-D and (b) G-D-Ag.
Figure 8Raman spectrum of (a) pure solid MTZ and (b) SERS spectrum of 1 × 10−5 M MTZ with G-D-Ag as a substrate, Laser ʎ = 633 nm, acquisition time; 20 sec, and objective; 50x.; with the assignments of Raman bands.
SERS enhancement factor of MTZ on G-D-Ag substarte.
| SERS spectra (cm−1) | Enhancement Factor (EF) |
|---|---|
| 1522 | 8.3 × 104 |
| 1452 | 1.1 × 104 |
| 1359 | 1.5 × 105 |
| 1320 | 2.5 × 104 |
| 1141 | 1.0 × 104 |
| 1090 | 2.3 × 104 |
| 1037 | 3.8 × 104 |
| 619 | 1.4 × 104 |
| 498 | 2.0 × 104 |
| 427 | 2.4 × 104 |
Figure 9(a) SERS spectra of MTZ with different concentration using G-D-Ag, (b) calibration curve of the band at 1359 cm−1. Laser ʎ = 633 nm, acquisition time; 20 sec, and objective; 50x.
Regression equation between Raman intensities and concentrations of MTZ and their coefficient of determination (R2).
| Raman Peaks | Regression Equation | R2 | Dynamic linear range (M) | LOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1359 cm−1 | y = 292.43x + 3409.8 | 0.9976 | 10−6–10−11 | 1.43 × 10−12 |
| 1320 cm−1 | y = 144.97x + 1651.9 | 0.9921 | 10−6–10−11 | 2.67 × 10−12 |
| 498 cm−1 | y = 124.14x + 1479 | 0.9744 | 10−6–10−11 | 3.71 × 10−12 |
| 427 cm−1 | y = 63.771x + 739.39 | 0.9651 | 10−6–10−11 | 0.91 × 10−11 |
*LOD: limit of detection.
Comparison of dynamic linear range, detection limits between and coefficient of determination (R2) this method and other methods for the determination of MTZ.
| Method | Dynamic linear range (M) | Limit of detection (M) | R2 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERS | 10−6–10−11 | See | See | Present work |
| SERS | 5.0 × 10−8–5.5 × 10−7 | 7.4 × 10−5 | 0.998 | |
| SERS | 1.8 × 10−9–1.3 × 10−6 | 8.8 × 10−10 | 0.9992 | |
| Flow-Injection | 1.75 × 10−5–8.75 × 10−4 | 8.75 × 10−6 | 0.999 | |
| Capillary Electrophoresis | 1.0 × 10−7–2.0 × 10−4 | 5.0 × 10−8 | 0.9995 | |
| DPV | 1.0 × 10−7–2.0 × 10−5 | 2.0 × 10−8 | 0.998 | |
| HPLC | 0.2 × 10−6–2.0 × 10−6 | 0.18 × 10−6 | 0.9975 | |
| SWV | 6.0 × 10−6–240 × 10−6 | 1.98 × 10−6 | 0.9996 |
Determination of MTZ in pharmaceutical tablet samples (n = 3); Recovered concentrations obtained for MTZ using a SERS method with G-D-Ag and calibration curve at 1359 cm−1 (n = 3).
| Sample | Expected | Found | Recovery % | Confidence interval | Bias (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tablet 1 | 5 mg/g | 4.93 mg/g | 98.6 | 0.31 × 10−6 M | −1.4 |
| Tablet 2 | 5 mg/g | 4.88 mg/g | 97.6 | 0.31 × 10−6 M | −2.4 |
| Spiked 1 | 2.5 × 10−6 M | 2.61 × 10−6 M | 104.4 | 0.48 × 10−6 M | +4.4 |
| Spiked 2 | 5.0 × 10−6 M | 5.13 × 10−6 M | 102.6 | 0.72 × 10−6 M | +2.6 |