Marie Y Davis1, Catherine O Johnson2, James B Leverenz3, Daniel Weintraub4, John Q Trojanowski5, Alice Chen-Plotkin6, Vivianna M Van Deerlin5, Joseph F Quinn7, Kathryn A Chung7, Amie L Peterson-Hiller7, Liana S Rosenthal8, Ted M Dawson9, Marilyn S Albert10, Jennifer G Goldman11, Glenn T Stebbins11, Bryan Bernard11, Zbigniew K Wszolek12, Owen A Ross13, Dennis W Dickson13, David Eidelberg14, Paul J Mattis14, Martin Niethammer15, Dora Yearout1, Shu-Ching Hu1, Brenna A Cholerton16, Megan Smith17, Ignacio F Mata1, Thomas J Montine18, Karen L Edwards17, Cyrus P Zabetian1. 1. Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington2Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. 3. Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 6. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon8Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland. 8. Neurodegeneration and Stem Cell Programs, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland10Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 9. Neurodegeneration and Stem Cell Programs, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland10Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland11Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland12Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 10. Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 11. Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 12. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. 13. Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. 14. Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York17Department of Neurology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York. 15. Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York. 16. Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington18Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. 17. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine. 18. Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Parkinson disease (PD) is heterogeneous in symptom manifestation and rate of progression. Identifying factors that influence disease progression could provide mechanistic insight, improve prognostic accuracy, and elucidate novel therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether GBA mutations and the E326K polymorphism modify PD symptom progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The entire GBA coding region was screened for mutations and E326K in 740 patients with PD enrolled at 7 sites from the PD Cognitive Genetics Consortium. Detailed longitudinal motor and cognitive assessments were performed with patients in the on state. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Linear regression was used to test for an association between GBA genotype and motor progression, with the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) score at the last assessment as the outcome and GBA genotype as the independent variable, with adjustment for levodopa equivalent dose, sex, age, disease duration, MDS-UPDRS III score at the first assessment, duration of follow-up, and site. Similar methods were used to examine the association between genotype and tremor and postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) scores. To examine the effect of GBA genotype on cognitive progression, patients were classified into those with conversion to mild cognitive impairment or dementia during the study (progression) and those without progression. The association between GBA genotype and progression status was then tested using logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, disease duration, duration of follow-up, years of education, and site. RESULTS: Of the total sample of 733 patients who underwent successful genotyping, 226 (30.8%) were women and 507 (69.2%) were men (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [8.8] years). The mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 3.0 (1.7) years. GBA mutations (β = 4.65; 95% CI, 1.72-7.58; P = .002), E326K (β = 3.42; 95% CI, 0.66-6.17; P = .02), and GBA variants combined as a single group (β = 4.01; 95% CI, 1.95-6.07; P = 1.5 × 10-4) were associated with a more rapid decline in MDS-UPDRS III score. Combined GBA variants (β = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.53; P = .01) and E326K (β = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86; P = .002) were associated with faster progression in PIGD scores, but not in tremor scores. A significantly higher proportion of E326K carriers (10 of 21 [47.6%]; P = .01) and GBA variant carriers (15 of 39 [38.5%]; P = .04) progressed to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: GBA variants predict a more rapid progression of cognitive dysfunction and motor symptoms in patients with PD, with a greater effect on PIGD than tremor. Thus, GBA variants influence the heterogeneity in symptom progression observed in PD.
IMPORTANCE: Parkinson disease (PD) is heterogeneous in symptom manifestation and rate of progression. Identifying factors that influence disease progression could provide mechanistic insight, improve prognostic accuracy, and elucidate novel therapeutic targets. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether GBA mutations and the E326K polymorphism modify PD symptom progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The entire GBA coding region was screened for mutations and E326K in 740 patients with PD enrolled at 7 sites from the PD Cognitive Genetics Consortium. Detailed longitudinal motor and cognitive assessments were performed with patients in the on state. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Linear regression was used to test for an association between GBA genotype and motor progression, with the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) score at the last assessment as the outcome and GBA genotype as the independent variable, with adjustment for levodopa equivalent dose, sex, age, disease duration, MDS-UPDRS III score at the first assessment, duration of follow-up, and site. Similar methods were used to examine the association between genotype and tremor and postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) scores. To examine the effect of GBA genotype on cognitive progression, patients were classified into those with conversion to mild cognitive impairment or dementia during the study (progression) and those without progression. The association between GBA genotype and progression status was then tested using logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, disease duration, duration of follow-up, years of education, and site. RESULTS: Of the total sample of 733 patients who underwent successful genotyping, 226 (30.8%) were women and 507 (69.2%) were men (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [8.8] years). The mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 3.0 (1.7) years. GBA mutations (β = 4.65; 95% CI, 1.72-7.58; P = .002), E326K (β = 3.42; 95% CI, 0.66-6.17; P = .02), and GBA variants combined as a single group (β = 4.01; 95% CI, 1.95-6.07; P = 1.5 × 10-4) were associated with a more rapid decline in MDS-UPDRS III score. Combined GBA variants (β = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.53; P = .01) and E326K (β = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86; P = .002) were associated with faster progression in PIGD scores, but not in tremor scores. A significantly higher proportion of E326K carriers (10 of 21 [47.6%]; P = .01) and GBA variant carriers (15 of 39 [38.5%]; P = .04) progressed to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: GBA variants predict a more rapid progression of cognitive dysfunction and motor symptoms in patients with PD, with a greater effect on PIGD than tremor. Thus, GBA variants influence the heterogeneity in symptom progression observed in PD.
Authors: Ignacio F Mata; James B Leverenz; Daniel Weintraub; John Q Trojanowski; Alice Chen-Plotkin; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Beate Ritz; Rebecca Rausch; Stewart A Factor; Cathy Wood-Siverio; Joseph F Quinn; Kathryn A Chung; Amie L Peterson-Hiller; Jennifer G Goldman; Glenn T Stebbins; Bryan Bernard; Alberto J Espay; Fredy J Revilla; Johnna Devoto; Liana S Rosenthal; Ted M Dawson; Marilyn S Albert; Debby Tsuang; Haley Huston; Dora Yearout; Shu-Ching Hu; Brenna A Cholerton; Thomas J Montine; Karen L Edwards; Cyrus P Zabetian Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: V E Kelly; C O Johnson; E L McGough; A Shumway-Cook; F B Horak; K A Chung; A J Espay; F J Revilla; J Devoto; C Wood-Siverio; S A Factor; B Cholerton; K L Edwards; A L Peterson; J F Quinn; T J Montine; C P Zabetian; J B Leverenz Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: M A Torralba; J I Pérez-Calvo; G M Pastores; A Cenarro; P Giraldo; M Pocoví Journal: Blood Cells Mol Dis Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Glenn T Stebbins; Christopher G Goetz; David J Burn; Joseph Jankovic; Tien K Khoo; Barbara C Tilley Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Albert A Davis; Kristin M Andruska; Bruno A Benitez; Brad A Racette; Joel S Perlmutter; Carlos Cruchaga Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Nathan Pankratz; Gary W Beecham; Anita L DeStefano; Ted M Dawson; Kimberly F Doheny; Stewart A Factor; Taye H Hamza; Albert Y Hung; Bradley T Hyman; Adrian J Ivinson; Dmitri Krainc; Jeanne C Latourelle; Lorraine N Clark; Karen Marder; Eden R Martin; Richard Mayeux; Owen A Ross; Clemens R Scherzer; David K Simon; Caroline Tanner; Jeffery M Vance; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Cyrus P Zabetian; Richard H Myers; Haydeh Payami; William K Scott; Tatiana Foroud Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Nicole Licking; Charles Murchison; Brenna Cholerton; Cyrus P Zabetian; Shu-Ching Hu; Thomas J Montine; Amie L Peterson-Hiller; Kathryn A Chung; Karen Edwards; James B Leverenz; Joseph F Quinn Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Laurie A Robak; Iris E Jansen; Jeroen van Rooij; André G Uitterlinden; Robert Kraaij; Joseph Jankovic; Peter Heutink; Joshua M Shulman Journal: Brain Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Koji Kasanuki; Michael G Heckman; Nancy N Diehl; Melissa E Murray; Shunsuke Koga; Alexandra Soto; Owen A Ross; Dennis W Dickson Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Thomas F Tropea; Sharon X Xie; Jacqueline Rick; Lana M Chahine; Nabila Dahodwala; Jimit Doshi; Christos Davatzikos; Leslie M Shaw; Vivianna Van Deerlin; John Q Trojanowski; Daniel Weintraub; Alice S Chen-Plotkin Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Jennifer A Ruskey; Lior Greenbaum; Léanne Roncière; Armaghan Alam; Dan Spiegelman; Christopher Liong; Oren A Levy; Cheryl Waters; Stanley Fahn; Karen S Marder; Wendy Chung; Gilad Yahalom; Simon Israeli-Korn; Vered Livneh; Tsvia Fay-Karmon; Roy N Alcalay; Sharon Hassin-Baer; Ziv Gan-Or Journal: Eur J Med Genet Date: 2018-05-26 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Katharina A Schindlbeck; An Vo; Nha Nguyen; Chris C Tang; Martin Niethammer; Vijay Dhawan; Vicky Brandt; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Susan B Bressman; David Eidelberg Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357