| Literature DB >> 27570566 |
Katherine A Sanders1, Miles C Benton2, Rod A Lea3, Vicki E Maltby4, Susan Agland5, Nathan Griffin4, Rodney J Scott6, Lotti Tajouri7, Jeannette Lechner-Scott8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunoactivation is less evident in secondary progressive MS (SPMS) compared to relapsing-remitting disease. MicroRNA (miRNA) expression is integral to the regulation of gene expression; determining their impact on immune-related cell functions, especially CD4+ T cells, during disease progression will advance our understanding of MS pathophysiology. This study aimed to compare miRNA profiles of CD4+ T cells from SPMS patients to healthy controls (HC) using whole miRNA transcriptome next-generation sequencing (NGS). Total RNA was extracted from CD4+ T cells and miRNA expression patterns analyzed using Illumina-based small-RNA NGS in 12 SPMS and 12 HC samples. Results were validated in a further cohort of 12 SPMS and 10 HC by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ T cells; Immunology; MicroRNAs; Multiple sclerosis; Next-generation sequencing; Secondary progressive
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27570566 PMCID: PMC5002332 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0253-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Details of SPMS and healthy control individuals
| Next generation sequencing | Replication cohort | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMS | HC | SPMS | HC | |
| Number | 12 | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| Female | 9 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| Age in years (mean ± SD) | 60.2 ± 8.3 | 61.3 ± 9.5 | 61.4.0 ± 6.5 | 60.1 ± 5.9 |
| EDSS (mean ± SD) | 6.9 ± 0.9 | NA | 5.9 ± 1.0 | NA |
| Active SPMS | 3 | NA | 4 | NA |
| Disease duration in years (mean ± SD) | 25.6 ± 11.1 | NA | 18.3 ± 6.5 | NA |
| Progression duration (mean ± SD) | 10.8 ± 8.1 | NA | 8.9 ± 6.2 | NA |
EDSS expanded disability status scale, SD standard deviation, NA not applicable
Fig. 1Tukey boxplot demonstrating the ten most significantly dysregulated microRNAs identified using NGS. Data is presented as log10 of the read count and clearly exhibits the down-regulation of miRNAs in SPMS (purple) compared to HC (gray). Whiskers represent data within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the upper and lower quartile. Data points outside of the 1.5 IQR are represented by black dots. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 2Tukey boxplot of top ten miRNAs expression (relative to RNU44) using RT-qPCR. Significant down-regulation of miR-21-5p, miR-26b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-142-3p, and miR-155-5p in SPMS was confirmed. Whiskers represent data within 1.5 interquartile range (IQR) of the upper and lower quartile. Data points outside of the 1.5 IQR are represented by black dots. p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Comparison of miRNA fold-change between NGS and RT-qPCR. Magnitude of change is consistent between NGS and RT-qPCR methods
Correlation coefficients calculated from RT-qPCR data against patient characteristics
| miR-21-5p | miR-26b-5p | miR-29b-3p | miR-142-3p | miR-155-5p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDSS | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| Age (HC) | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.21 | −0.08 |
| Age (SPMS) | −0.07 | −0.17 | −0.17 | −0.30 | −0.01 |
| Disease duration | 0.49 | 0.15 | 0.23 | −0.08 | 0.49 |
| Progression duration | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | −0.07 | 0.17 |
Genes identified by miRSystem targeted by eight of the ten microRNAs
| miR-21-5p | miR-23a-3p | miR-26b-5p | miR-27a-3p | miR-27b-3p | miR-29b-3p | miR-30e-5p | miR-142-3p | miR-155-5p | miR-221-3p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V | ||
|
| V | V | V | V | V | V | V | V |
Verified targeting miRNAs are identified with a “V”
Fig. 4Expression of SOCS6 relative to GAPDH. Up-regulation of SOCS6 in SPMS is significant though widely distributed (*p = 0.042)