Denise C Jarrin1,2, Ivy Y Chen1,2, Hans Ivers1,2, Christopher L Drake3, Charles M Morin1,2. 1. École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada. 2. Centre d'étude des Troubles du Sommeil, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec City, Québec, Canada. 3. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST) is a self-report tool that measures sleep reactivity (i.e., vulnerability to experience situational insomnia under stressful conditions). Sleep reactivity has been termed a "trait-like" vulnerability; however, evidence of its long-term stability is lacking. The main objective of the current psychometric study was to investigate the temporal stability of the FIRST over two 6-mo intervals in a population-based sample of adults with and without insomnia. The temporal stability of the FIRST was also compared with the temporal stability of other scales associated with insomnia (trait-anxiety, arousability). METHODS: Participants included 1,122 adults (mean age = 49.9 y, standard deviation = 14.8; 38.8% male) presenting with an insomnia syndrome (n = 159), insomnia symptoms (n = 152), or good sleep (n = 811). Participants completed the FIRST, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (trait-anxiety), and the Arousal Predisposition Scale (arousability) on three different occasions: baseline and at 6- and 12-mo follow-up. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for all scales (baseline to 6 mo and 6 to 12 mo). RESULTS: The FIRST yielded strong temporal stability from baseline to 6 mo among those with insomnia syndrome (ICC = 0.81), symptoms (ICC = 0.78), and good sleep (ICC = 0.81). Similar results were observed for 6 to 12 mo among those with insomnia syndrome (ICC = 0.74), insomnia symptoms (ICC = 0.82), and good sleep (ICC = 0.84). The stability of the FIRST was not comparable with the stability of trait-anxiety, but was somewhat comparable with the stability of arousability. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the FIRST is a temporally reliable stable scale over 6-mo intervals. Future research is needed to corroborate the stability and trait-like measures of sleep reactivity with physiological, behavioural and personality measures.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test (FIRST) is a self-report tool that measures sleep reactivity (i.e., vulnerability to experience situational insomnia under stressful conditions). Sleep reactivity has been termed a "trait-like" vulnerability; however, evidence of its long-term stability is lacking. The main objective of the current psychometric study was to investigate the temporal stability of the FIRST over two 6-mo intervals in a population-based sample of adults with and without insomnia. The temporal stability of the FIRST was also compared with the temporal stability of other scales associated with insomnia (trait-anxiety, arousability). METHODS:Participants included 1,122 adults (mean age = 49.9 y, standard deviation = 14.8; 38.8% male) presenting with an insomnia syndrome (n = 159), insomnia symptoms (n = 152), or good sleep (n = 811). Participants completed the FIRST, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (trait-anxiety), and the Arousal Predisposition Scale (arousability) on three different occasions: baseline and at 6- and 12-mo follow-up. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for all scales (baseline to 6 mo and 6 to 12 mo). RESULTS: The FIRST yielded strong temporal stability from baseline to 6 mo among those with insomnia syndrome (ICC = 0.81), symptoms (ICC = 0.78), and good sleep (ICC = 0.81). Similar results were observed for 6 to 12 mo among those with insomnia syndrome (ICC = 0.74), insomnia symptoms (ICC = 0.82), and good sleep (ICC = 0.84). The stability of the FIRST was not comparable with the stability of trait-anxiety, but was somewhat comparable with the stability of arousability. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the FIRST is a temporally reliable stable scale over 6-mo intervals. Future research is needed to corroborate the stability and trait-like measures of sleep reactivity with physiological, behavioural and personality measures.
Authors: Ravi Singareddy; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Julio Fernandez-Mendoza; Duanping Liao; Susan Calhoun; Michele L Shaffer; Edward O Bixler Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Allison G Harvey; Lynda Bélanger; Lisa Talbot; Polina Eidelman; Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau; Émilie Fortier-Brochu; Hans Ivers; Manon Lamy; Kerrie Hein; Adriane M Soehner; Chantal Mérette; Charles M Morin Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-05-26
Authors: Philip Cheng; David A Kalmbach; Hsing-Fang Hsieh; Andrea Cuamatzi Castelan; Chaewon Sagong; Christopher L Drake Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 10.592
Authors: Thomas C Neylan; Ronald C Kessler; Kerry J Ressler; Gari Clifford; Francesca L Beaudoin; Xinming An; Jennifer S Stevens; Donglin Zeng; Sarah D Linnstaedt; Laura T Germine; Sophia Sheikh; Alan B Storrow; Brittany E Punches; Kamran Mohiuddin; Nina T Gentile; Meghan E McGrath; Sanne J H van Rooij; John P Haran; David A Peak; Robert M Domeier; Claire Pearson; Leon D Sanchez; Niels K Rathlev; William F Peacock; Steven E Bruce; Jutta Joormann; Deanna M Barch; Diego A Pizzagalli; John F Sheridan; Steven E Harte; James M Elliott; Irving Hwang; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Karestan C Koenen; Samuel A McLean Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Kathleen Patricia O'Hora; Raquel A Osorno; Dena Sadeghi-Bahmani; Mateo Lopez; Allison Morehouse; Jane P Kim; Rachel Manber; Andrea N Goldstein-Piekarski Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-03-14
Authors: Anthony N Reffi; Christopher L Drake; David A Kalmbach; Tanja Jovanovic; Seth D Norrholm; Thomas Roth; Melynda D Casement; Philip Cheng Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 5.296
Authors: David A Kalmbach; Andrea S Cuamatzi-Castelan; Christine V Tonnu; Kieulinh Michelle Tran; Jason R Anderson; Thomas Roth; Christopher L Drake Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2018-07-17