Literature DB >> 27568394

CT of suspected thoracic acute aortic injury in the emergency department: is routine abdominopelvic imaging worth the additional collective radiation dose?

Shawn Haji-Momenian1, Jonathan Rischall2, Neil Okey2, Myles Taffel3, Nadia Khati3, Robert Zeman3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the incidence of non-traumatic acute aortic injury (AAI) extending from the chest into the abdomen or pelvis in emergency department (ED) patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS), to estimate the effective dose of the abdominopelvic portion of these CT exams, and to compare the number needed to screen (NNS) with the collective population radiation dose of imaging those stations. All patients (n = 238) presenting to the ED with AAS between March 2014 and June 2015 who were imaged per CT AAI protocol (noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were retrospectively identified in this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study. The Stanford classification for positive cases of AAI was further subclassified based on chest, abdominal, or pelvic involvement. The dose length product (DLP) of each exam was used to estimate the dose of the abdominal and pelvic stations and the collective effective dose for the population. There were five cases of aortic dissection (AD) and two of intramural hematoma (IMH), with an AAI incidence of 2.9/100. Three cases of AAI were confined to the chest. Two cases of AAI were confined to the chest and abdomen, and two cases involved the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. There was only one case of AAI involving the ascending aorta that extended into the abdomen or pelvis. The number needed to screen to identify (a) AAI extending from the chest into the abdomen or pelvis was 59.5 and (b) Stanford A AAI extending into the abdomen or pelvis was 238. The estimated mean effective dose for the abdominopelvic stations were unenhanced abdomen 2.3 mSv, unenhanced pelvis 3.3 mSv, abdominal CTA 2.5 mSv, and pelvic CTA 3.6 mSv. The collective effective doses to the abdomen and pelvis with unenhanced CT and CTA in 59.5 patients and 238 patients were 761.6 and 3046.4 mSv, respectively. While the estimated mean effective dose for imaging of the abdominopelvic stations are low, the collective effective dose should also be considered. It may be beneficial to modify or omit routine unenhanced CT and/or CTA of the abdomen/pelvis in this patient population in the absence of abdominal symptoms, and image the abdomen and pelvis in positive thoracic cases only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute aortic injury; Acute aortic syndrome; Aortic dissection; CT angiography; Collective dose; Effective dose; Field of view; Intramural hematoma; Stanford classification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27568394     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-016-1435-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  35 in total

1.  Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values.

Authors:  Michael Toepker; Thomas Moritz; Bernhard Krauss; Michael Weber; Gordon Euller; Thomas Mang; Florian Wolf; Christian J Herold; Helmut Ringl
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta.

Authors:  Ioannis Vlahos; Myrna C B Godoy; David P Naidich
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Endovascular management of thoracic dissections.

Authors:  Warren Swee; Michael D Dake
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

Authors:  P G Hagan; C A Nienaber; E M Isselbacher; D Bruckman; D J Karavite; P L Russman; A Evangelista; R Fattori; T Suzuki; J K Oh; A G Moore; J F Malouf; L A Pape; C Gaca; U Sechtem; S Lenferink; H J Deutsch; H Diedrichs; J Marcos y Robles; A Llovet; D Gilon; S K Das; W F Armstrong; G M Deeb; K A Eagle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Robert G Hayter; James T Rhea; Andrew Small; Faranak S Tafazoli; Robert A Novelline
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Jonathan H Chung; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Carlos A Rojas; Bhavika R Dave; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Acceptability of virtual unenhanced CT of the aorta as a replacement for the conventional unenhanced phase.

Authors:  N Shaida; D J Bowden; T Barrett; E M Godfrey; A Taylor; A P Winterbottom; T C See; D J Lomas; A S Shaw
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Acute aortic syndromes: a second look at dual-phase CT.

Authors:  Andrew J Lovy; Jessica K Rosenblum; Jeffrey M Levsky; Alla Godelman; Benjamin Zalta; Vineet R Jain; Linda B Haramati
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending thoracic aorta and arch.

Authors:  Kwang Ree Cho; Anthony W Stanson; D Donald Potter; Kenneth J Cherry; Hartzell V Schaff; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  C A Nienaber; Y von Kodolitsch; B Petersen; R Loose; U Helmchen; A Haverich; R P Spielmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.