Frenk P M L Peeters1, Henricus G Ruhe2, Marieke Wichers3, Latifa Abidi1, Karin Kaub4, H Josephine van der Lande4, Jan Spijker5, Marcus J H Huibers6, Aart H Schene7. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands. 2. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academisch Medisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Mood and Anxiety Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, the Netherlands. 3. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center for the Pathophysiology and Emotion regulation, Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, the Netherlands. 4. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academisch Medisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. ProPersona Mental Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 7. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academisch Medisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is common in daily practice. An empirical, widely accepted and applicable measure to quantify TRD is lacking. Previously, the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM) showed good validity. We aimed to improve the MSM by refining and extending its items resulting in the Dutch Measure for quantification of TRD (DM-TRD). METHODS: In addition to duration, severity and failed treatments in the current depressive episode, we added items for functional impairment, comorbid anxiety, personality disorders and psychosocial stressors. We extended the augmentation section and added items for failed psychotherapy and intensified treatment. We examined psychometric properties of the DM-TRD and tested prediction of future depressive symptoms and remission after 16 weeks in 274 (DSM-IV) depressed in- and outpatients entering naturalistic treatment. RESULTS: The DM-TRD showed excellent inter-/intra-rater reliability. Higher scores were associated with more symptoms and less remission during follow-up. The DM-TRD outperformed the MSM in prediction of future depressive symptomatology. Remission was predicted equally well by both measures. Longer duration of the current episode, larger functional impairment and larger baseline symptom severity were the strongest predictors of symptomatology at follow-up. Longer duration and larger functional impairment were negatively associated with remission. LIMITATIONS: Longer follow-up could have increased predictive power. Addition of items for somatic co-morbidity, childhood adversity and psychotic features must be investigated further. CONCLUSION: The DM-TRD has excellent psychometric properties and better predictive validity for clinical outcome than other sophisticated measure published to date. Its use in clinical practice and research will improve treatment planning in TRD-patients.
BACKGROUND: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is common in daily practice. An empirical, widely accepted and applicable measure to quantify TRD is lacking. Previously, the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM) showed good validity. We aimed to improve the MSM by refining and extending its items resulting in the Dutch Measure for quantification of TRD (DM-TRD). METHODS: In addition to duration, severity and failed treatments in the current depressive episode, we added items for functional impairment, comorbid anxiety, personality disorders and psychosocial stressors. We extended the augmentation section and added items for failed psychotherapy and intensified treatment. We examined psychometric properties of the DM-TRD and tested prediction of future depressive symptoms and remission after 16 weeks in 274 (DSM-IV) depressed in- and outpatients entering naturalistic treatment. RESULTS: The DM-TRD showed excellent inter-/intra-rater reliability. Higher scores were associated with more symptoms and less remission during follow-up. The DM-TRD outperformed the MSM in prediction of future depressive symptomatology. Remission was predicted equally well by both measures. Longer duration of the current episode, larger functional impairment and larger baseline symptom severity were the strongest predictors of symptomatology at follow-up. Longer duration and larger functional impairment were negatively associated with remission. LIMITATIONS: Longer follow-up could have increased predictive power. Addition of items for somatic co-morbidity, childhood adversity and psychotic features must be investigated further. CONCLUSION: The DM-TRD has excellent psychometric properties and better predictive validity for clinical outcome than other sophisticated measure published to date. Its use in clinical practice and research will improve treatment planning in TRD-patients.
Authors: D A van Dijk; M L Deen; Th M van den Boogaard; H G Ruhé; J Spijker; F P M L Peeters Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 5.760
Authors: Wicher A Bokma; Guido A A M Wetzer; Jurriaan B Gehrels; Brenda W J H Penninx; Neeltje M Batelaan; Anton L J M van Balkom Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2019-06-23 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Dominique S Scheepens; Jeroen A van Waarde; Freek Ten Doesschate; Mirjam Westra; Marijn C W Kroes; Aart H Schene; Claudi L H Bockting; Robert A Schoevers; Damiaan A J P Denys; Henricus G Ruhé; Guido A van Wingen Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-08-03
Authors: Mira B Cladder-Micus; Anne E M Speckens; Janna N Vrijsen; A Rogier T Donders; Eni S Becker; Jan Spijker Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: A Kautzky; M Dold; L Bartova; M Spies; G S Kranz; D Souery; S Montgomery; J Mendlewicz; J Zohar; C Fabbri; A Serretti; R Lanzenberger; D Dikeos; D Rujescu; S Kasper Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 6.392