Literature DB >> 27566654

EPHA7 and EPHA10 Physically Interact and Differentially Co-localize in Normal Breast and Breast Carcinoma Cell Lines, and the Co-localization Pattern Is Altered in EPHB6-expressing MDA-MB-231 Cells.

Candace Johnson1, Briana Segovia1, Raj P Kandpal2.   

Abstract

Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma cell (EPH) receptors comprise the most abundant receptor tyrosine kinase family characterized to date in mammals including humans. These proteins are involved in axon guidance, tissue organization, vascular development and the intricate process of various diseases including cancer. These diverse functions of EPH receptors are attributed, in part, to their abilities for heterodimerization. While the interacting partners of kinase-deficient EPHB6 receptor have been characterized, the interaction of the kinase-dead EPHA10 with any other receptor has not been identified. By using co-immunoprecipitation, we demonstrated physical interaction between kinase-deficient EPHA10 with kinase-sufficient EPHA7 receptor. Immunocytochemical analyses have revealed that these two receptors co-localize on the cell surface, and soluble portions of the receptors exist as a complex in the cytoplasm as well as the nuclei. While EPHA7 and EPHA10 co-localize similarly on the membrane in MCF10A and MCF7 cells, they were differentially co-localized in MDA-MB-231 cells stably transfected with empty pcDNA vector (MDA-MB-231-PC) or an expression construct of EPHB6 (MDA-MB-231-B6). The full-length isoforms of these receptors were co-localized on the cell surface, and the soluble forms were present as a complex in the cytoplasm as well as the nucleus in MDA-MB-231-PC cells. MDA-MB-231-B6 cells, on the other hand, were distinguished by the absence of any signal in the nuclei. Our results represent the first demonstration of physical interaction between EPHA10 and EPHA7 and their cellular co-localization. Furthermore, these observations also suggest gene-regulatory functions of the complex of the soluble forms of these receptors in breast carcinoma cells of differential invasiveness. Copyright
© 2016, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; EPH receptors; EPHA10; EPHA7; breast carcinoma cells; cellular co-localization; co-immunoprecipitation; protein-protein interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566654      PMCID: PMC5070625     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics        ISSN: 1109-6535            Impact factor:   4.069


  51 in total

1.  Discovery of a secreted tumor suppressor provides a promising therapeutic strategy for follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Marc R Mansour; A Thomas Look
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  EphrinA5-EphA7 complex induces apoptotic cell death via TNFR1.

Authors:  Haeryung Lee; Eunjeong Park; Yujin Kim; Soochul Park
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.034

3.  The EPHB6 receptor tyrosine kinase is a metastasis suppressor that is frequently silenced by promoter DNA hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yu; Etmar Bulk; Ping Ji; Antje Hascher; Moying Tang; Ralf Metzger; Alessandro Marra; Hubert Serve; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rainer Wiewroth; Steffen Koschmieder; Carsten Müller-Tidow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Effect of EphA7 Silencing on Proliferation, Invasion and Apoptosis in Human Laryngeal Cancer Cell Lines Hep-2 and AMC-HN-8.

Authors:  Cheng Xiang; Yuanjing Lv; Yanjie Wei; Jing Wei; Susheng Miao; Xionghui Mao; Xin Gu; Kaibin Song; Shenshan Jia
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-05-11

Review 5.  RTK SLAP down: the emerging role of Src-like adaptor protein as a key player in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.

Authors:  Leanne E Wybenga-Groot; C Jane McGlade
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.315

6.  EphB6 receptor significantly alters invasiveness and other phenotypic characteristics of human breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  B P Fox; R P Kandpal
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Eph receptor tyrosine kinases in tumor and tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Dana Brantley-Sieders; Sonja Schmidt; Monica Parker; Jin Chen
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Low EphA7 Expression Correlated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Qin Bai; Jun-Yi Zhang; Chun-Ying Bai; Xiu-E Xu; Jian-Yi Wu; Bo Chen; Zhi-Yong Wu; Shao-Hong Wang; Jian Shen; Jin-Hui Shen; Xiao-Dong Yao; Lian-Zhu Gao; Bao Wu; Hong-Li Gu; Xiao-Hui Liu; Xin Li; En-Min Li; Li-Yan Xu
Journal:  Acta Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The junction-associated protein AF-6 interacts and clusters with specific Eph receptor tyrosine kinases at specialized sites of cell-cell contact in the brain.

Authors:  M Buchert; S Schneider; V Meskenaite; M T Adams; E Canaani; T Baechi; K Moelling; C M Hovens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-01-25       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Effects of altered ephrin-A5 and EphA4/EphA7 expression on tumor growth in a medulloblastoma mouse model.

Authors:  Shilpa Bhatia; Kellen Hirsch; Nimrah A Baig; Olga Rodriguez; Olga Timofeeva; Kevin Kavanagh; Yi Chien Lee; Xiao-Jing Wang; Christopher Albanese; Sana D Karam
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  7 in total

1.  Stem-like Cells from Invasive Breast Carcinoma Cell Line MDA-MB-231 Express a Distinct Set of Eph Receptors and Ephrin Ligands.

Authors:  Mariana Lucero; Jaspreet Thind; Jacqueline Sandoval; Shayan Senaati; Belinda Jimenez; Raj P Kandpal
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Artesunate-induced Cellular Effects Are Mediated by Specific EPH Receptors and Ephrin Ligands in Breast Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Tanin Zadeh; Mariana Lucero; Raj P Kandpal
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 3.  Differential Expression Patterns of Eph Receptors and Ephrin Ligands in Human Cancers.

Authors:  Chung-Ting Jimmy Kou; Raj P Kandpal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The landscape of DNA methylation-mediated regulation of long non-coding RNAs in breast cancer.

Authors:  Chunlong Zhang; Xinyu Wang; Xuecang Li; Ning Zhao; Yihan Wang; Xiaole Han; Ce Ci; Jian Zhang; Meng Li; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-08

5.  The Evolutionary History of Ephs and Ephrins: Toward Multicellular Organisms.

Authors:  Aida Arcas; David G Wilkinson; M Ángela Nieto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Activation of EPHA2-ROBO1 Heterodimer by SLIT2 Attenuates Non-canonical Signaling and Proliferation in Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Saumya Srivastava; Ka Ming Pang; Mari Iida; Michael S Nelson; Jiayi Liu; Arin Nam; Jiale Wang; Isa Mambetsariev; Raju Pillai; Atish Mohanty; Nellie McDaniel; Amita Behal; Prakash Kulkarni; Deric L Wheeler; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 7.  Cataloguing the dead: breathing new life into pseudokinase research.

Authors:  Safal Shrestha; Dominic P Byrne; John A Harris; Natarajan Kannan; Patrick A Eyers
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.542

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.